FY 1999 proposal 199705908
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199705908 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Securing Wildlife Mitigation Sites-Oregon, Multnomah Channel |
| Proposal ID | 199705908 |
| Organization | Metropolitan Service District of Oregon (Metro) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Jim Morgan |
| Mailing address | 600 NE Grand Ave. Portland, OR 97232 |
| Phone / email | 5037971727 / morganj@metro.dst.or.us |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Willamette |
| Short description | Re-establish the native riparian vegetation on public lands on Multnomah Channel bottomlands; assess vegetation and wildlife habitat on 309 acres of wetland; develop enhancement strategy; develop watershed protection plan. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $2,650 | |
| Fringe | $910 | |
| Supplies | $11,000 | |
| Indirect | $3,420 | |
| Subcontractor | $47,020 | |
| $65,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $65,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $65,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Seasonal flooding of Columbia River in May-June of each year may delay topographic, herpetile, bird and plant surveys.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Technical Issue: Need more detail on future monitoring and evaluation to measure the success of the restoration.Comment:
Fund under 9705900Comment:
The ISRP reviewers comment that wildlife mitigation proposals in this series all employ essentially a narrative template, but this one offers better information about the intended site(s). The discussion here is superior as well in providing detail about specific activities, methods, objectives, and costs.