FY 1999 proposal 199705916
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199705916 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge Additions |
| Proposal ID | 199705916 |
| Organization | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) as a member of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife for the Oregon Wildlife Coalition (OWC). Also, TPL, TNC, ONHP, MRT, others (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | John Beck |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 |
| Phone / email | 5038725260 / john.s.beck@state.or.us |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Willamette |
| Short description | This project consists of two components: 1) facilitate coordination and planning between Oregon wildlife managers via funding of wildlife planning and coordination staff for each member of the OWC; 2) implementation projects for future potential mitigatio |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Capital | $1,000,000 | |
| Subcontractor | $0 | |
| $1,000,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $1,000,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,000,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Possible constraints may include delays due to NEPA requirements, slow response times from regulatory agencies regarding issuance of permits for proposed enhancement work, etc.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Fund under 9705900Comment:
Notwithstanding their recommendation, ISRP reviewers suggest that the proposed budget may be excessive. They comment also that greater detail is required on objectives and methods, and the proposal should identify related proposals.