FY 1999 proposal 199800300
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199800300 Narrative | Narrative |
| 199800300 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | O & M Funding of Wildlife Habitat on STOI Reservation for Grand Coulee Dam |
| Proposal ID | 199800300 |
| Organization | Spokane Tribe of Indians (STOI) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Chris Merker |
| Mailing address | STOI, P.O. Box 100 Wellpinit, WA 99040 |
| Phone / email | 5092587055 / wildlife@ior.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Upper Columbia / Upper Columbia Mainstem |
| Short description | Operate, maintain and continue to enhance benefits of partial wildlife habitat mitigation for losses due to flooding of tribal land (3900 acres) due to Grand Coulee Dam. Currently 1065 acres are protected. By FY99, complete expected goal of 1768ac. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $34,500 | |
| Fringe | $9,315 | |
| Supplies | $16,000 | |
| Travel | $3,660 | |
| Indirect | 21.6% on salaries/benefits | $9,464 |
| Subcontractor | $24,000 | |
| $96,939 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $96,939 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $96,939 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Protection of habitat acreage goal; application of management methods to reach stable, late successional, low maintenance state; correlation of HEP results with population responses.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Was 9129 (changed 4/15 per BPA)Comment:
(Previously 9129) This is a good wildlife habitat proposal, which gives details on project history and methods. The proposal describes how lands will be prioritized for purchase. Strengths of the proposal include emphasis on passive management and the focus on direct measures of at least one population (deer), though consideration of other populations would be of value. The proposal could have better addressed habitat fragmentation and unit size.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $190,563 | $190,563 | $190,563 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website