FY 1999 proposal 199800702

Additional documents

TitleType
199800702 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleGrande Ronde Supplementation - O&M/M&E - Nez Perce Tribe Lostine
Proposal ID199800702
OrganizationNez Perce Tribe (NPT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameBecky Ashe
Mailing addressP.O. Box 365 Lapwai, ID 83540
Phone / email2088437320 / bashe@clearwater.net
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Grande Ronde
Short descriptionOperate an adult weir/trap facility and a juvenile acclimation/ release facility on the Lostine River to facilitate the Grande Ronde Basin Endemic Spring Chinook Supplementation Program.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $149,960
Fringe $33,715
Supplies $12,550
Operating $26,912
Capital $33,482
Tag $14,500
Travel $27,624
Indirect $79,381
Subcontractor $4,000
$382,124
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$382,124
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$382,124
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Completion of NEPA, NPPC 3-step review process, Section 10 permit from NMFS, success of the captive broodstock element.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Incomplete: Match Objectives (Section 4) to later description of objectives in Section 7. Describe methods specific to this project (Lostine element) and not for entire Grand Ronde Program. Clarify methods. Use other sections of proposal for background and history and program framework, if necessary. Define "Develop" (Section 4, Objective 2). Does it mean plan or build in FY99? Are redd counts part of this or other project?

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete Give some budget details - what does Capital and O&M represent?, Travel 27.6k?, Report 38k?


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Slight reduction from increased efficiencies
Recommendation:
Grande Ronde NEOH - Inadequate as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

The time specified to do pre-project evaluation to establish a baseline appears inadequate. Using six fish from the same brood year bottlenecks the population; thus, the effort is unlikely to achieve the goals and objectives of the project. How long do they need to run this program to reach their intended results? Are they accelerating inbreeding depression? The proposal does not adequately describe a monitoring and evaluation program. This proposal also does not ensure that the activities will not be harmful to the wild stocks. This proposal is not well justified as a research or conservation tool.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$581,215 $581,215 $581,215

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website