FY 1999 proposal 199800702

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
199800702 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Grande Ronde Supplementation - O&M/M&E - Nez Perce Tribe Lostine
Proposal ID	199800702
Organization	Nez Perce Tribe (NPT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Becky Ashe
Mailing address	P.O. Box 365 Lapwai, ID 83540
Phone / email	2088437320 / bashe@clearwater.net
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Lower Snake / Grande Ronde
Short description	Operate an adult weir/trap facility and a juvenile acclimation/ release facility on the Lostine River to facilitate the Grande Ronde Basin Endemic Spring Chinook Supplementation Program.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel		$149,960
Fringe		$33,715
Supplies		$12,550
Operating		$26,912
Capital		$33,482
Tag		$14,500
Travel		$27,624
Indirect		$79,381
Subcontractor		$4,000
		$382,124

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$382,124
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$382,124
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Completion of NEPA, NPPC 3-step review process, Section 10 permit from NMFS, success of the captive broodstock element.

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Nonwatershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Incomplete: Match Objectives (Section 4) to later description of objectives in Section 7. Describe methods specific to this project (Lostine element) and not for entire Grand Ronde Program. Clarify methods. Use other sections of proposal for background and history and program framework, if necessary. Define "Develop" (Section 4, Objective 2). Does it mean plan or build in FY99? Are redd counts part of this or other project?

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete Give some budget details - what does Capital and O&M represent?, Travel 27.6k?, Report 38k?

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Slight reduction from increased efficiencies

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Grande Ronde NEOH - Inadequate as a set

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

The time specified to do pre-project evaluation to establish a baseline appears inadequate. Using six fish from the same brood year bottlenecks the population; thus, the effort is unlikely to achieve the goals and objectives of the project. How long do they need to run this program to reach their intended results? Are they accelerating inbreeding depression? The proposal does not adequately describe a monitoring and evaluation program. This proposal also does not ensure that the activities will not be harmful to the wild stocks. This proposal is not well justified as a research or conservation tool.

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review

Funding category:
expense

Date:
May 2005

FY05 NPCC start of year:	FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:	FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$581,215	$581,215	$581,215

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website