FY 1999 proposal 199801001

Additional documents

TitleType

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleGrande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Broodstock Program
Proposal ID199801001
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Nez Perce Tribe (ODFW, NPT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameRichard W. Carmichael
Mailing address211 Inlow Hall, EOU, 1410 ā€œLā€ Avenue La Grande, OR 97850
Phone / email5419623777 / odfw2@eou.edu
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Grande Ronde
Short descriptionDevelop and implement captive broodstock programs and associated monitoring, evaluation and fish health for spring chinook salmon populations in Catherine Creek, and the upper Grande Ronde and Lostine rivers.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9202604 Early life history of spring chinook salmon in the Grande Ronde Basin. We utilize migration timing information from this project to determine when to collect juveniles for captive broodstock. Life history information will also be used to access the success of supplementation programs
8805301 NE Oregon Hatcheries - ODFW, CTUIR, and NPT Captive broodstock program will be directly integrated into the NE Oregon Hatcheries program as it will be providing the broodstock and eggs that will be utilized for NEOH.
8905302 NE Oregon Hatcheries - ODFW, CTUIR, and NPT Captive broodstock program will be directly integrated into the NE Oregon Hatcheries program as it will be providing the broodstock and eggs that will be utilized for NEOH.
5520700 Captive Broodstock Artificial Propagation This is the NPT funding for cooperative evaluation of the Grande Ronde Spring Chinook Captive Broodstock Program.
8909600 Genetic Monitoring and Evaluation of Snake River Salmon and Steelhead This project provides samples for the genetics monitoring program.
Fish Passage Center Smolt Monitoring Program - Migration characteristics During the summer we PIT tag parr in Catherine Cr & the Lostine and Grande Ronde Rivers. We collect parr for captive broodstock when parr PIT tagging occurs. This project also provides personnel and information to improve efficiencies.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $196,930
Fringe $74,675
Supplies $36,530
Operating $60,200
Capital $8,835
Tag 1700 $4,930
Travel $29,500
Indirect $91,400
Subcontractor NA $0
$503,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$503,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$503,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: There is risk of not completing construction of facilities in an timely fashion. NEPA is proceeding on schedule. There is a risk that too few fish may be available in some years to meet collection goals.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes: Show budget details, including staffing . Report 25k?


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Slight reduction from increased efficiencies
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

The proposal includes work to provide basic data on broodstock and wild populations that is important to have before the NEOH production and supplementation activities are implemented. These aspects of the project do not rely on the NEOH Grande Ronde hatchery to be implemented. Additionally, a population at critically low levels is targeted for attempted preservation using captive brood techniques.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$723,718 $723,718 $723,718

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website