FY 2000 proposal 20047
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
20047 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Enhancement of salmonid gamete quality by manipulation of intracellular ATP |
Proposal ID | 20047 |
Organization | University of Idaho (UI) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Rolf L. Ingermann |
Mailing address | Department of Biological Sciences Moscow, ID 83844-3051 |
Phone / email | 2088856280 / rolfi@uidaho.edu |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 2000 |
Province / Subbasin | Mainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Develop methods to enhance the short-term storage of unfrozen salmonid gametes and improve the quality of salmonid eggs and nonactivated, activated, and cryopreserved sperm. |
Target species | Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (chinook) and Oncorhynchus mykiss (steelhead/rainbow) |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Genetic Retrieval from Single Sperm (Dr. | Project Participant | |
Endocrine Control of Ovarian Development in Salmonids (Dr. James J. Nagler) | Project Participant | |
Analyzing Genetic and Behavioral Changes During Salmonid Domestication (Dr. | Project Participant | |
Induction of Precocious Sexual Maturity and Enhanced Egg Production in Fish | Project Participant |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | Rolf Ingermann (3.0 mo); Joseph Cloud (1.0 mo), (James Nagler after FY2000), 1 Technician (12.0 mo), | $76,000 |
Fringe | RLI, JGC, Tech: 28.5%, GS: 1%, UGS: 1% during school year, 9% during summer | $16,410 |
Supplies | Supplies (7,000), NMR & Flow Cytometer use (6,000) | $13,000 |
Operating | Graduate Student Tuition & Fees (2,500), Vehicle Rental (1,000), Publication Costs, Xeroxing, Graphi | $8,000 |
Capital | Equipment: Microcentrifuge (2,500), Laboratory Computer (2,500) | $5,000 |
Travel | $3,000 | |
Indirect | 44.7% | $56,505 |
Other | Center for Reproductive Biology Administrative Core (5,000) | $5,000 |
$182,915 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost | $182,915 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2000 budget request | $182,915 |
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Recommendation: Do not fund. The proposal does not justify programmatic need.Comments: From a scientific standpoint this is a well-designed study with specific, measurable objectives. The concept of ATP as a screening tool to predict motility and fertilizing ability of salmonid sperm and eggs is presented in a convincingly manner. The proposal systematically aligns scientific hypotheses, tasks, anticipated results, potential problems and corrective actions and assessment/evaluation approaches Reviewers disagree however whether it would have practical applicability in improving the efficiency of using gamete samples for increased artificial and wild production of fish populations.
Comment:
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? yes - Question the applicability of this research.Comment:
Sounds like pure theoretical research. Unclear what the application is for the recovery of listed species.Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting];