FY 2000 proposal 20088

Additional documents

TitleType
20088 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleAssess Mckenzie Watershed Habitat and Prioritize Projects
Proposal ID20088
OrganizationMcKenzie Watershed Council (MWC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJohn Runyon, Watershed Coordinator
Mailing addressP.O. Box 53 Springfield, OR 97477
Phone / email5417415235 / runyon@proaxis.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 2000
Province / SubbasinLower Columbia / Willamette
Short descriptionAssess McKenzie Watershed habitat by synthesizing recent watershed analyses and gathering data to address information gaps. The project will provide a basin-wide context for fish & wildlife habitat protection, restoration and monitoring strategies.
Target speciesNative anadromous fish: spring chinook salmon Native resident fish: bull trout, Oregon chub, cutthroat trout, rainbow trout, and others Wildlife: Peregrine falcon, Northern spotted owl, Western pond turtle, wolverine, Townsend's big-eared, spotted frog
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9206800 Implementation of Willamette Basin Mitigation Program--Wildlife Targets acquisition of critical wildlife habitat in the Upper Willamette Basin. The project identifies and prioritizes land acquisitions in the McKenzie/Willamette confluence and lower McKenzie Watershed areas.
9405300 Bull Trout Assessment - Willamette/McKenzie Monitors the distribution, population trends, and habitat use of bull trout populations in the Upper Willamette Basin, and develops and implements reintroduction plan. The project identifies high-quality bull trout habitat for protection and restoration.
9607000 McKenzie Watershed Council Coordination Coordinates McKenzie Watershed Council administration, project planning, implementation and monitoring among multiple stakeholders/landowners. The proposed project would be guided by the ongoing McKenzie Watershed Council framework.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2000 cost
Personnel $0
Fringe $0
Supplies $0
Operating Contract management by McKenzie Watershed Council $14,000
Indirect Administrative charge for fiscal management by Cascade Pacific RC&D $14,000
Subcontractor Sub-contract assessment; contractor determined by RFP $155,000
$183,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost$183,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2000 budget request$183,000
FY 2000 forecast from 1999$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
U.S. Forest Service In-kind technical assistance $10,000 unknown
Bureau of Land Management In-kind technical assistance $10,000 unknown
Weyerhaeuser Company In-kind technical assistance $10,000 unknown
Eugene Water & Electric Board In-kind technical assistance $10,000 unknown
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Permits may be required before undertaking species and habitat surveys needed to fill information gaps identified when synthesizing existing data. The McKenzie Watershed Council will consult with ODFW, NMFS, and USFWS to obtain all necessary permits.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fund for one year
Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Fund for one year. Subsequent funding contingent on the authors addressing the concerns in the ISRP's comments.

Comments: The proposal is well described, although references to various contractors and other generic entities identified should be spelled out to indicate who shall be responsible for each of eight objectives. Reviewers are uncomfortable with the present anonymity of contractors and subcontractors whose qualifications and competency are not known. What criteria are to be used in selecting them? The proposal contains conflicting wording on the identification of limiting factors (see Page 12 of Project No. 960700 and Page 14 of Project No. 20088). What difference is there in the analyses reported in Project No. 960700 and the work to be done in this proposal?


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:


Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

A comprehensive definition of "Watershed Assessment" has not yet been developed by CBFWA, ISRP and NPPC. Lack an overall assessment of need in the basin. This is the kind of WSA that we are looking for. Wont overlap with coordination grant. #2-Will develop the assessment: Linked to other planning efforts. #5-Some shown but slight. #12-Has to consider other activities.
Recommendation:
Technically Sound? Yes
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Well written proposal.

Proposal does demonstrate the need for a comprehensive watershed assessment but to create the assessment from existing data should not cost $155,000.

$14,000 to manage the subcontractor should be covered on the previous proposal 9607000.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]