FY 2000 proposal 20145
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Evaluate Little Walla Walla Screening Facility |
| Proposal ID | 20145 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Richard W. Carmichael |
| Mailing address | 211 Inlow Hall, EOU, 1410 “L” Avenue LaGrande, OR 97850 |
| Phone / email | 5419623777 / odfw2@eosc.osshe.edu |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Walla Walla |
| Short description | Evaluate juvenile salmonid passage and migration at the newly constructed Little Walla Walla Bypass and Trapping Screening Facility. Investigate fish injury, delay, and entrainment, and measure water velocities at facility structures. |
| Target species | Summer steelhead, spring chinook salmon, bull trout |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 8805302 |
Design and Construct NEOH Hatchery for WW |
Source of fish for testing |
| 9000501 |
Walla Walla Natural Production M&E |
Monitor natural production at screening facility |
| 20524 |
Multi-Year Plan Walla Walla Anadromous Fish Plan |
|
| 20145 |
Evaluate Little Walla Walla Screening Facility |
|
| 8802200 |
Walla Walla Fish Passage Operations |
|
| 9601100 |
Juvenile Fish Passage Improvement - WW River |
|
| 9601200 |
Adult Fish Passage Improvement - WW River |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$109,795 |
| Fringe |
|
$43,072 |
| Supplies |
|
$6,000 |
| Operating |
|
$10,000 |
| Capital |
Computer, bypass trap |
$4,500 |
| Travel |
|
$6,910 |
| Indirect |
35.5% |
$62,400 |
| $242,677 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $242,677 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $242,677 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Facility construction may not be completed as scheduled, delaying start of evaluation
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Fund in part
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Fund in part for one year at reduced level.
Comments:
The project seems like more than is necessary to evaluate performance of the screen. It should be possible to obtain the necessary information within part of one year. It is not clear that a full-time person would be required for the tasks involved.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Technical Criteria 1: Met? NA - Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? yes -
Milestone Criteria 3: Met? yes -
Resource Criteria 4: Met? yes -
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000
Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting];