FY 2000 proposal 20156

Additional documents

TitleType
20156 Narrative Narrative
20156 Sponsor Response to the ISRP Response

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleIdentification Of Redband And Rainbow Trout In The N F Clearwater Basin
Proposal ID20156
OrganizationNez Perce Tribe (NPT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDana Weigel
Mailing address3404 Highway 12 Orofino, ID 83544
Phone / email2084769502 / weigeld@clearwater.net
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 2000
Province / SubbasinMountain Snake / Clearwater
Short descriptionWe are proposing a 12 month genetic study to identify if native wild redband trout exist in the North Fork Clearwater basin, and determine if introgression from hatchery rainbow trout threatens native redband and cutthroat trout in the basin.
Target speciesredband trout, westslope cutthroat trout
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9501600 Genetic Inventory of Westslope Cutthroat Trout in the NF Clearwater basin this proposed project will supplement information that has been acquired in 9501600 testing introgression and species distribution
8740700 Dworshak Rule Curves this proposed project will determine if a native fish, currently not identified, exists in the NF Clearwater basin and should be considered in the evaluation of multipurpose dam operations on resident fish in Dworshak Reservoir
9709900 Dworshak Impacts Assessment this proposed project can ultimately be used toward information supporting a consumptive fishery in Dworshak Reservoir

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2000 cost
Personnel 6 mo Project Leader 2 seasonals 2 mo each $32,000
Fringe $8,500
Supplies office supplies, vials, racks, ethanol, waders, boots $2,000
Operating 4 mo rent, phone, utilities, vehicle $4,500
Travel field per diem, travel to AFS conference to present results $2,000
Indirect 23% $10,925
Subcontractor genetic analyses $51,000
$110,925
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost$110,925
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2000 budget request$110,925
FY 2000 forecast from 1999$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Fund

Comments: This project is intended to show whether redband trout exist in the North Fork Clearwater River basin, and to determine whether rainbow trout have introgressed into redband populations. It is of interest to know whether redband trout exist in the basin; however, if redbands are present, introgression is likely. In any case, knowledge that their gene pool now includes rainbow trout genes is of little utility primarily because there is no reasonable way to regain their original genetic structure. The best to be done now, is to stop stocking exotic rainbow trout. If a decision is made to continue stocking Dworshak Reservoir with trout, the brood stock should be from the native fishes. The project may have some potential benefit to the extent that remnant native populations can be identified, and the project should focus more an tasks related to this objective.


Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:


Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Screening Criteria: no-The measures listed don't address redband.

Technical Criteria: no-There is no evidence that the population is in poor shape. It doesn't meet Criteria 6-8. Projects 20148, 20147, 20156, 9501600, are all doing native fish surveys in the same basin for $650,000. Unnecessary detail on a very small area (over researching the area)

Programmatic Criteria: no-It does not address urgent threat to population

Milestone Criteria: no-It is a survey based proposal.

General Comments: This could have been sub-component of other project.


Recommendation:
Rank 29
Date:
Oct 8, 1999

Comment:

Rank Comments: This important study would identify if native wild redband trout exist in the North Fork Clearwater basin, and determine if whether rainbow trout have introgressed into redband populations.
Recommendation:
Rank 29
Date:
Oct 8, 1999

Comment:

This important study would identify if native wild redband trout exist in the North Fork Clearwater basin, and determine if whether rainbow trout have introgressed into redband populations.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 2-2-00 Council Meeting];