FY 2000 proposal 20531
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Multi-Year Grande Ronde Anadromous Fish Plan |
| Proposal ID | 20531 |
| Organization | Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority (CBFWA) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Tom Giese |
| Mailing address | 2501 SW First Ave., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97201 |
| Phone / email | 5032290191 / tom@cbfwf.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Blue Mountain / Grande Ronde |
| Short description | |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 9801001 |
Captive broodstock protection and supplementation. |
|
| 9801006 |
Captive broodstock protection and supplementation. |
|
| 9800703 |
Build additional supplementation hatcheries. |
|
| 9800702 |
Build additional supplementation hatcheries. |
|
| 9702500 |
Habitat enhancement implementation. |
|
| 9402700 |
Habitat enhancement implementation. |
|
| 8402500 |
Habitat enhancement implementation. |
|
| 9403900 |
Administration, coordination and planning support for habitat enhancement. |
|
| 9202601 |
Administration, coordination and planning support for habitat enhancement. |
|
| 20531 |
MYP Grande Ronde Anadromous Fish Plan |
|
| 9608300 |
Habitat enhancement implementation. |
|
| 8909600 |
M & E of supplementation impacts on genetic characteristics. |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$0 |
| Fringe |
|
$0 |
| Supplies |
|
$0 |
| $0 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $0 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $0 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
NA - Umbrella Proposal
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
NA - Umbrella Proposal
Comments:
This umbrella proposal gives a brief overview of CBFWA activities associated with anadromous fishes in the Grande Ronde basin. The presentation assumed that the reviewer had extensive knowledge of the status of chinook and summer steelhead stocks, neither explaining it in this proposal, nor providing any references for the benefit of the reviewer. The umbrella did mention that coho and sockeye were extirpated, suggesting that, for these two species, there was a need to address the problem. The presentation did not give a clear rationale for the set of studies included under this umbrella, only listing those studies in Section 3. There was nothing more about them and no time sequencing. The proposal acknowledges that habitat degradation is a problem, but does not address solutions for that problem. The hatcheries emphasized here, even when the hatcheries are soundly designed, does not mitigate for lost habitat, and the reliance on captive broodstock assumes and requires solutions to habitat problems to increase adult survival. Overall, only a bare minimum was presented in this umbrella; in the future, more detail on rationale for the overall efforts and on their integration would be particularly helpful.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? N/A -