FY 2000 proposal 198710002

Additional documents

TitleType
198710002 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleProtect and Enhance Anadromous Fish Habitat in the Umatilla River Subbasin
Proposal ID198710002
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameTim Bailey
Mailing address73471 Mytinger Lane Pendleton, OR 97801
Phone / email5412762344 / umatfish@oregontrail.net
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 2000
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Umatilla
Short descriptionProtect and enhance coldwater fish habitat on private lands in the Umatilla River basin in a manner that achieves self-sustaining salmonid populations and their associated habitat by utilizing natural stream functions to the fullest extent.
Target speciesSummer Steelhead
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1998 Protected 11 miles of stream by installing 16 miles of fence and retrofitting existing projects with bioengineering treatments.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2000 cost
Personnel full time bio, Tech 2, Tech 1 and 1-2 seasonals, Prgm Ma., Office specialist, ODFW engineers $128,804
Fringe 38% of personnel $48,946
Supplies New Implementation $54,200
Operating This includes only materials, vehicles, mileage, office supplies, tools & equipment $34,337
Capital Equipment Trailer and Utility Trailer $15,000
Travel Vehicle Mileage and Training Perdiem $9,918
Indirect Admin. Overhead @ 35.5%, excluding capital and subcontracts $98,053
Subcontractor Fence construction, instream construction, weed control $75,900
$465,158
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost$465,158
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2000 budget request$465,158
FY 2000 forecast from 1999$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (seeking) instream materials and construction $150,000 unknown
Governor's Watershed Enhancement Board (seeking) Fencing materials $27,750 unknown
ODFW Restoration & Enhancement Board (seeking) Fence construction $18,750 unknown
Landowner (secured) Fence materials fence construction and fence line surveying $50,000 unknown
ODFW - Wildlife (secured) Fence materials $3,900 unknown
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Catastrophic events such as flooding, wildfire, etc.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Fund. Review next year for reporting of results.

Comments: This proposal is not a stand-alone project. It needs to be evaluated within the Umatilla Subbasin umbrella. The concept is good, but it is noted that only 3 of 13 projects are on schedule. Reviewers wondered how much of the budget goes for lease agreements.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:


Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Reducing implementation. Costs reduced as a result of improved efficiencies. General reduction in the scope of the project.
Recommendation:
Technically Sound? Yes
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Is this program cost effective? How many fish have returned lately? What has been the trend?

Long term projects (programs) need to be evaluated for effectiveness to date.

Is it appropriate for BPA to fund conservation easements/ improvements on a NWPPC Member's property?

Proposal exceeds the page limit.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$300,264 $300,264 $300,264

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website