FY 2000 proposal 198712700
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 198712700 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Smolt Monitoring by Federal and Non-Federal Agencies |
| Proposal ID | 198712700 |
| Organization | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Pam Kahut/Michele Dehart |
| Mailing address | 45 SE 82nd Dr., Suite 100 Gladstone, OR 97027-2522 |
| Phone / email | 5036505400 / Pam_Kahut@psmfc.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Mainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Daily passage data through the mainstem, Snake, Columbia and mid-Columbia rivers to facilitate fish passage management decisions, including Biological Opinion implementation, is collected daily. Sampling and marking occur at 8 sites of the larger region. |
| Target species | yearling chinook, sub-yearling chinook, coho, steelhead, sockeye |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1998 | Completed all tasks & objectives |
| 1997 | Completed all tasks & objectives |
| 1996 | Completed all tasks & objectives |
| 1995 | Completed all tasks & objectives |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9008000 | PITAGIS | Critical Component |
| 9602100 | Gas Bubble Disease Research & Monitoring | Critical, one task only |
| 8712703 | Imnaha River SMP | |
| 8401400 | SMP Marking | |
| 8332300 | Smolt Condition & Arrival Timing | |
| 940330 | Fish Passage Center | |
| 8332300 | Monitor Smolts at the Head of Lower Granite Reservoir and Lower Granite Dam | |
| 8712702 | Comparative Survival Study | |
| 20552 | SMOLT MONITORING PROGRAM | |
| 8712700 | Smolt Monitoring (Federal and Non-Federal) |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | Includes Fringe Benefits | $1,255,201 |
| Fringe | $0 | |
| Supplies | $0 | |
| Operating | Includes supplies, materials, etc. | $161,459 |
| Capital | $27,604 | |
| PIT tags | $72,500 | |
| Travel | $29,761 | |
| Indirect | $323,924 | |
| $1,870,449 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $1,870,449 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $1,870,449 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| COE | Funding Transportation LGR | $66,690 | unknown |
| (reimbursable) | Sampling LGS | $68,036 | unknown |
| LMN | $56,135 | unknown | |
| MCN | $73,130 | unknown |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Recommendation: Fund for one year. Subsequent funding contingent on programmatic review. This entire set of smolt monitoring projects needs to receive a programmatic review with one of the goals to develop and justify a program-wide design that really is capable of delivering enough data, of high enough precision, to answer the management questions.Comments: The proposal justifies the need for the work to benefit fish. A clear relationship to Biological Opinion implementation is demonstrated. This work is related to other funded work and the linkages are well described. The objectives are clearly stated and related to the project activities. More details relating to the monitoring and evaluation of the results, scheduling of specific tasks and details of sampling design would strengthen the proposal. The smolt monitoring programs in the Umbrella Proposals: 20552, 20542 have been designed to work together to provide temporal and spatial information on juvenile salmon migrations. The projects employ state-of-the-art capture and tagging methods that are periodically reviewed for efficacy. Information from these programs routinely forms the basis for peer reviewed scientific publications that guide policy and research. There is little justification or description of design. It is good that they identify the location of sampling sites. The monitoring needs to be coordinated with analysis and research. Can we really measure the things we are hoping to measure?
Comment:
Comment:
Part of SMP.Comment:
Criteria all: Met? Yes -Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $2,239,743 | $2,239,743 | $2,239,743 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website