FY 2000 proposal 198816000
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Willamette Hatchery Oxygen Supplementation |
| Proposal ID | 198816000 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Dr. Harry Lorz |
| Mailing address | ODFW, 7118 NE Vandenberg Ave. Corvallis, OR 97330-9446 |
| Phone / email | 5417574186 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Willamette |
| Short description | Determines survival of chinook salmon reared at various densities under conditions of oxygen supplementation. |
| Target species | Spring chinook salmon |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
| 1989 |
Completion of hatchery modifications |
| 1994 |
Completion of 4 experimental rearing years |
| 1995 |
Through 1998: Analysis of water quality data |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 9000500 |
Umatilla Hatchery Monitoring |
|
| 8903500 |
Umatilla Hatchery Operations and Maintenance |
|
| 881603 |
Juvenile salmon migration |
|
| 20550 |
Willamette Basin Mitigation Program Umbrella |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$0 |
| Fringe |
|
$0 |
| Supplies |
Publication costs |
$2,000 |
| Indirect |
35.5% |
$710 |
| Subcontractor |
Dr. R.D. Ewing (Biotech |
$30,600 |
| $33,310 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $33,310 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $33,310 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Fund with high priority
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Fund with high priority a final year of funding to complete analysis and writing of final reports on this long-term study.
Comments:
The proposal itself is of poor quality, but funding is endorsed to conclude 10 years of work to evaluate the long-term effects of this large hatchery experiment. Resulting data should be of considerable value. The project has produced an impressive number (11) of refereed publications.
Specific comments and questions that should also be addressed are:
Some aspects of the proposal are not well explained (e.g., the specific coded-wire tag analytical technique; qualifications of the sponsors; and the continuing relevance of this work to NPPC goals). Where is support coming from for the Principal Investigator? What are the unique qualifications of the consultant to help complete this project? No vitae were provided. What role has he/she played in the project? Should the consultant's work be submitted for bid?
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? yes -
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Fund, to complete final report only. Proponents implied that FY99 would be the final year of funding. Why is there continuation into FY00? #1-research on this topic is no longer a priority. #4-none shown. Write final report by 6/2000. Finish it.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000
Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003
Comment:
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003
Comment:
