FY 2000 proposal 198902900
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Hood River Production Program-Pelton Ladder-Hatchery |
| Proposal ID | 198902900 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Tony Nigro |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 |
| Phone / email | 5038725252 / Tony.Nigro@state.or.us |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Gorge / Hood |
| Short description | Incubate and rear Hood River destined spring chinook at Round Butte Hatchery and Pelton Ladder. This is a project to re-establish a self-sustaining spring chinook salmon population in the Hood River subbasin. Broodstock is collected at the Powerdale Fish |
| Target species | Spring chinook |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
| 1996 |
Converted a portion of Pelton Ladder into rearing cells for Hood River spring chinook. |
| 1993 |
Initiated releases of Deschutes stock spring chinook in the Hood River subbasin. |
| 1997 |
Hood River Production Program EIS completed. |
| 1997 |
Spring chinook brood collected from adults and jacks returning to Powerdale Dam. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 20513 |
Hood River / Fifteenmile Creek Umbrella Proposal |
|
| 9301900 |
Powerdale, Parkdale, and Oak Springs O&M |
|
| 9500700 |
Pelton Ladder Hood River Production/PGE O&M |
|
| 8805303 |
Hood River Production Program/CTWS M&E |
|
| 8805304 |
Hood River Production Program/ODFW M&E |
|
| 9802100 |
Hood River Fish Habitat/Implement habitat improvement actions |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
Salaries |
$42,059 |
| Fringe |
OPE @ 40% |
$17,996 |
| Supplies |
Including fish feed |
$19,606 |
| Indirect |
35.5% |
$21,550 |
| Other |
Fin-clipping and coded wire tagging |
$13,818 |
| $115,029 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $115,029 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $115,029 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
| BPA |
Spring chinook smolt rearing |
$148,645 |
unknown |
| Long View Fibre Company |
Use of West Fork Hood River acclimation site and site preparation |
$2,500 |
unknown |
| CTWSRO Salmon Corps and AmeriCorp |
Acclimation pond and water supply and discharge line assembly |
$5,000 |
unknown |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None anticipated
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Fund (high priority).
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Fund (high priority). OK for multi-year funding; review on an annual basis for progress toward meeting objectives.
Comments:
This is integrally linked to a number of the other key ongoing projects. The fish production herein is critical to the HRPP as it stands defined. The original concerns of using non-native fish have been addressed - unless there are some difficulties that are not apparent from the narrative. Objectives are well delineated, although the technical details of methodology is not always so detailed. If procedures are not changing, the details may not be all that necessary. The methods could better line up with the objectives. According to the proposal, the average smolt-to-adult return since 1993 has been ~0.2% (240 adults divided by 125,000 smolts). This is far below the 0.68% SAR target, which suggests that there may be opportunities to improve survival of hatchery smolts. Perhaps taking 50% of the returning adults for broodstock is a bit risky until the performance of hatchery releases can be demonstrably improved. There doesn't seem to be a mechanism in the set of proposals to say we are making a mistake here. The completion date is not mentioned. The budget is unclear (section 5). The requested budget from BPA is $115,029, but under cost-sharing this is listed as $148,645?
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? yes -
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
#1 Obj1 &3&4, #2rearing SpCh to re-establish in Hood; #3 in kid 94%BPA #5 Alts reviewed in NEPA.#7 critical to reestablishing SpCh in Hood.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000
Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]