FY 2000 proposal 198906500
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
198906500 Narrative | Narrative |
198906500 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Annual Stock Assessment - CWT (USFWS) |
Proposal ID | 198906500 |
Organization | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Walt Ambrogetti |
Mailing address | 9317 Highway 99, Suite I Vancouver, WA 98665 |
Phone / email | 3606967605 / walter_ambrogetti@fws.gov |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 2000 |
Province / Subbasin | Mainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Apply coded-wire tags to production groups of salmon at federal hatcheries not tagged by other programs (4 hatcheries). Prepare report on survival trends and distribution of anadromous stocks from 11 federal hatcheries for basin-wide stock assessment. |
Target species | Spring chinook and coho salmon |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1989 | Tagged and marked 334,236 salmon |
1990 | Tagged and marked 372,770 salmon |
1991 | Tagged and marked 882,816 salmon |
1992 | Tagged and marked 872,385 salmon |
1993 | Tagged and marked 1,094,511 salmon |
1994 | Tagged and marked 1,042,845 salmon |
1995 | Tagged and marked 1,076,237 salmon |
1996 | Tagged and marked 556,744 salmon |
1997 | Tagged and marked 718,358 salmon |
1998 | Tagged and marked 693,431 salmon |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9306000 | Select Area Fisheries Evaluation | Source of fish, and reared, tagged and marked for program. |
9603302 | Yakima River Coho Restoration | Source of fish, and reared for this program. |
9000500 | Umatilla Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Projects | Source of fish, evaluated against this source program. |
8343500 | Umatilla Hatchery Satellite Facilities O&M | Source of fish, and reared for this program and evaluated against the source program. |
9604000 | Wenatchee/Methow Coho Restoration | Past and potential source of fish, and reared for this program and evaluated against the source program. |
9600800 | PATH- Participation by State & Tribal Agencies | CWT data from 8906500 used in analyses. |
8712702 | Comparative Survival Rate Study (CSS) of Hatchery PIT Tagged Chinook | Fish from 8906500 project hatchery used as control group in this study. CWT data needed for comparative survival analysis to PIT tags. |
8906600 | Annual Stock Assessment - CWT (WDFW) | |
8906900 | Annual Stock Assessment - CWT (ODFW) | |
8906500 | Annual Stock Assessment - CWT (USFWS) | |
8201300 | Coded Wire Tag Recovery Program (PSMFC) | |
20543 | Coded Wire Tag Program |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $28,157 | |
Fringe | $9,855 | |
Supplies | $18,625 | |
Operating | $17,857 | |
Travel | $1,660 | |
Indirect | $28,182 | |
Subcontractor | $6,250 | |
$110,586 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost | $110,586 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2000 budget request | $110,586 |
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Recommendation: Fund for one year. Subsequent funding contingent on a programmatic review. This entire set of smolt monitoring projects needs to receive a programmatic review with one of the goals to develop and justify a program-wide design that really is capable of delivering enough data, of high enough precision, to answer the management questions. In the future, this should be a candidate for a multi-year review cycle with review required only if major changes are made to CWT tagging, recovery or catch estimation procedures.Comments: The major decrease in funding requested (from $399,460 in 1999 to $110,586 in 2000) is due to work transferred to other projects or funding sources. However, one concern is the forecasted 10% increase in costs each year, compared to lower projected increases (e.g. 0% to 3%) in most other similar projects. It is not possible to comment on the other proposed costs without more detailed information of the CWT requirements and specific costs for applying and recovering them in this project. More information is required on the past success of this project. For example, is this project recovering sufficient numbers of tagged fish to successfully conduct annual assessments? See comments on CWT umbrella.
Comment:
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? yes -Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]