FY 2000 proposal 198907201
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
198907201 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Independent Scientific Advisory Board Support |
Proposal ID | 198907201 |
Organization | Department of Energy/Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE/ORNL) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Charles C. Coutant |
Mailing address | Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6036 |
Phone / email | 4235766830 / coutantcc@ornl.gov |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 2000 |
Province / Subbasin | Mainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Provide support through contract with DOE for Dr. Charles Coutant for the Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB), for scientific advice to the NPPC's FWP and NMFS's ESA programs. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1996 | Review of the FWP. NPPC Report 96-6 by the Independent Scientific Group: Return to the River. |
1997 | Participated in 8 reviews requested by NMFS and the Council including reviews of downstream passage for salmon, PIT Tag research, NMFS Waiver of Dissolved Gas Standard, ecological impacts of BiOp flow provisions on Hungry Horse and Libby resident fishes. |
1998 | Participated in 8 Reviews requested by NMFS, the Council, and Congress including review of the Corps Capital Construction Program, PIT tag workplan, and the Multi-Species Framework Scientific Principles. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9600500 | Independent Scientific Advisory Board | 9600500 is the primary (umbrella) proposal for the ISAB. This proposal is separate solely because of contractual requirements of the DOE. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $61,410 | |
Fringe | $0 | |
Supplies | $0 | |
Travel | $11,550 | |
Indirect | ORNL/DOE | $26,958 |
$99,918 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost | $99,918 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2000 budget request | $99,918 |
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Schedules established monthly.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Recommendation: Not reviewedComments: Not Reviewed
Comment:
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? NA - Describe basis for characterization of "independent".Comment:
Due to budget constraints and emphasis of tasks, AFM suggests that the BPA Direct Program fund 50% of this project and the remaining funds be provided by the capital and reimbursable portion of the MOA.Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]