FY 2000 proposal 199106000

Additional documents

TitleType
199106000 Narrative Narrative
199106000 Sponsor Response to the ISRP Response

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titlePend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife Mitigation Project - Kalispel
Proposal ID199106000
OrganizationKalispel Tribe of Indians (KNRD)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameRay D. Entz
Mailing addressP.O. Box 39 Usk, WA 99180
Phone / email5094451147 / rentz@knrd.org
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 2000
Province / SubbasinInter-Mountain / Pend Oreille
Short descriptionProtect, restore, enhance and maintain important wetland/riparian wildlife habitat along the Pend Oreille River as partial mitigation for the construction and operation impacts associated with Albeni Falls Dam consistent with regional planning documents.
Target speciesBald Eagle (breeding and wintering), Black-capped Chickadee, Canada Goose, Mallard, Muskrat, Yellow Warbler, and White-tailed deer
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1992 Land acquisition of 436 acre parcel for baseline protection of 371 HU's
1993 Began management efforts on the project
1994 Completed bio-engineered shoreline stabilization projects on highly eroded banks
1995 Completed implementation of three wetland control structures for increased wetland quantity, quality, and diversity
1996 Completed the construction of two nesting islands for waterfowl
1997 Land acquisition of additional 164 acre adjjacent parcel for baseline protection of 246 HU's
1997 Five-year HEP update on original purchase showing an increase of 182 HU's through management activities
1998 Completed 25 acres of riparian cottonwood reforestation on the main acquisition site
1998 Completed 30 acres of hardwood stand improvement on the main acquisition site
1998 Completed the draft management plan for the additional parcel

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9206100 Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation Project - IDFG complimentary and interconnected in fulfilling mitigation for Albeni Falls Dam
9004401 Lake Creek Watershed Acquisition - Coeur d'Alene Tribe complimentary and interconnected in fulfilling mitigation for Albeni Falls Dam

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2000 cost
Personnel .2 FTE oversight, 2.1 FTE (1 biologist, 1 tech and .1 equip operator) implementation $68,598
Fringe 30% of personnel $20,580
Supplies Plants, tools, etc $10,000
Operating Fence repair, water control structures, building mainenance, vegetation maintenance, erosion maint. $12,000
Capital vehicle lease $6,000
Travel related meetings and training $3,500
Indirect 19.8% of direct costs less contract services and capital equipment $25,439
Other heavy equipment lease and office space $7,800
$153,917
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost$153,917
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2000 budget request$153,917
FY 2000 forecast from 1999$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Kalispel Tribe law enforcement $3,000 unknown
Kalispel Tribe project vehicles/equipment $3,000 unknown
Kalispel Tribe Computer, printer $2,000 unknown
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Critical constraints include: funding stability over time for adequate operation & maintenance and monitoring & evaluation in order to provide HUs to BPA


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fund for one year
Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Fund for one year. Subsequent funding contingent on provision of results. This proposal may have been adequate for multi-year review cycle if they had provided a better description of results to date.

Comments: This project proposes to enhance already acquired wetlands for conservation to increase wildlife abundance, maintain existing enhancement measures, and monitor and evaluate in terms of wildlife abundance past and proposed enhancement activities. The project is not land acquisition (that was done in 1992 and 1997) but restoration/enhancement, operations, and monitoring. Enhancement procedures are designed appropriately for specific habitat types, and all past and present activities are to be thoroughly monitored. When monitoring indicates a failure to meet project objectives modification will be enacted. This is a logical and rational approach. A drawback of this proposal is that it does not consider potential conflicts of obtaining project objectives with fisheries mitigation projects in the area. However, this appears to have been a successful project.

The proposal quality was good, in the midrange of those reviewed. The proposal references the FWP and several other statements and plans. It is related to two other projects (920611, 9004401). It involves two tribes and IDFG as a working group. There have been good accomplishments since 1991. There is good background, rationale, and relationships to other projects. The good project history shows good planning and agency cooperation. Objectives, methods, and facilities are fine. The budget seems reasonable. There are good resumes of staff. This could be a good candidate for multi-year funding.

The primary shortcoming of the proposal is the failure to provide data on the target species using the site. After over 7 years, it is poor to say they still do not have a management plan. What's the plan here for M&E? What are the milestones? It is pretty far into the project to be presenting so little monitoring and evaluation information.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:


Recommendation:
Technically Sound? Yes
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Explain how this project fits in a watershed context.

Good description of enhancement activities.


Recommendation:
Fundable
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$99,250 $99,250 $99,250

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website