FY 2000 proposal 199603501

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
199603501 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Satus Watershed Restoration
Proposal ID	199603501
Organization	Yakama Indian Nation (YN)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Lynn Hatcher, Fisheries Program Mangager
Mailing address	P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948
Phone / email	5098656262 / yinfish@yakama.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 2000
Province / Subbasin	Columbia Plateau / Yakima
Short description	Enhance and protect summer steelhead spawning and rearing habitat by restoring the ecological function of the Satus Creek watershed.
Target species	Yakima River summer steelhead

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment
1997	Dike removal
1998	Road obliteration
1997	Boulder placement
1996	Grazing (rest/management)
1996	Fire rehabilitation
1996	Revegetation
1996	Meadow restoration
1997	Large woody debris placement
1997	Aspen regeneration

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description
	Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Umbrella	dependence of supplementation on habitat carrying capacity
9901300	Ahtanum Creek Watershed Assessment
20547	Yakima Subbasin Habitat/Watershed Project Umbrella
	Yakima Subbasin Assessment (new)
9803400	Reestablish Safe Access Into Tributaries of the Yakima Subbasin
9705000	Little Naches Riparian and In-Channel Restoration
9705100	Yakima Basin Side Channels
9705300	Toppenish-Simcoe Instream Flow Restoration and Assessment
9803300	Restore Upper Toppenish Creek Watershed
926200	Yakama Nation Riparian/Wetlands Restoration Project

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2000 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2000 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2000 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2000 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2000 cost
Personnel	Includes a total of 2.4 fte professional staff, 3.5 fte technicians, and .25 fte bookkeeper	$202,160
Fringe	25.3%	$51,146
Supplies	Includes: seed, erosion control supplies, fence materials, miscellaneous field supplies.	$41,900
Operating	Includes: Building rental, utilities, vehicles + maintenance, heavy equipment rental, insurance,etc.	$93,795
Travel	Travel for various symposia, workshops, etc.	$7,000
Indirect	23.5%	$93,695
Subcontractor	Cattele impoundment	$12,700
		$502,396

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2000 cost	$502,396
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2000 budget request	$502,396
FY 2000 forecast from 1999	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind
Washington State Department of Transportation	Collaboration on U.S. HWY 97 segement relocation and maintenance mitigation	$0	unknown

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Unfavorable climatic conditions are the foremost constraints on accomplishing objectives. At present, we are uncertain what affect the Endangered Species Act will have on project activities.

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
ISRP Preliminary Review (ISRP 99-2)

Recommendation:
Fund for one year

Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Fund for one year. Subsequent funding contingent on correcting the noted deficiencies.

Comments: This was a well written and convincing proposal. The program appears to have many strengths, including broad scale interagency support, participation, and active monitoring and assessment. It also has several significant weaknesses. The proposal could have been improved by providing more scientific citations and documentation. The programmatic needs and goals could have been supported by citations supporting the decline in populations abundance, changes in the watershed, or the watershed assessment. The methods section contained good general descriptions, but could have been supported by scientific references to show that these were based on the best available scientific techniques.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Subregional Team Comments

Recommendation:

Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Project budget appears high in personnel costs. Due to the nature of the demonstration project and continued support, we would like to follow through with our commitment to complete the restoration project. We expect to see allocation of technical staff time reduced in future years. There should be funding available through CREP for riparian restoration.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Watershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:
Technically Sound? No

Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

No evidence that past activities have met any biological objectives.

Monitoring and assessment plans do not provide enough detail. How will the sponsor assess surface/groundwater connections?

Tasks presented in the Methods section are redundant.

What land will be purchased and why?

What will happen to the money allocated for capital acquisitions if no land is purchased?

REVIEW:
NWPPC Funding Recommendation (NWPPC 2000-6)

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review

Funding category:
expense

Date:
May 2005

FY05 NPCC start of year:	FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:	FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$388,600	$388,600	$388,600

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website