FY 2000 proposal 199701100
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199701100 Narrative | Narrative |
199701100 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Enhance and Protect Habitat and Riparian Areas on the DVIR |
Proposal ID | 199701100 |
Organization | Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Indian Reservation (SPT - DVIR) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Guy Dodson Sr. |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 219 Owyhee, NV 89832 |
Phone / email | 2087593246 / dvirfg@aol.com |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 2000 |
Province / Subbasin | Middle Snake / Owyhee |
Short description | This project increases critical riparian areas of the Owyhee River and its tributaries as well as preserves the numerous natural springs located on the Duck Valley Indian Reservation. Provides a clean pure source of water for the fish and wildlife in the |
Target species | Redband trout, Bull trout, introduced trout species (rainbow) for put and take fisheries; other resident trout species comprising the native community; anadromous salmonids (reintroduction/off site mitigation; all wildlife species. |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1997 | Begin habitat assessments on DVIR |
Initiate fishery survey | |
Purchase equipment to begin habitat work | |
Quarterly & Annual report | |
1998 | Begin habitat work on springs |
Continue habitat assessment and fishery survey |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9501500 | Lake Billy Shaw Wetlands Catch and Release Fishery O&M | A new BPA funded reservoir was completed in 1998 on the DVIR -- the development of its fisheries needs to be integrated within a comprehensive fish management plan. |
8815600 | Stocking Fish in Lakes and streams on the DVIR | Stocking of hatchery trout in reservoirs and streams has been implemented for many years to provide fisheries and economic benefits to the DVIR — this program needs to be re-evaluated & integrated in the rationale of a comprehensive fish management plan. |
9500600 | Shoshone-Bannock-Shoshone-Paiute Joint Culture Facility | A BPA funded fish culture facility is being developed to provide trout production to supplement fisheries on the DVIR and Fort Hall. Its operation should be coordinated with the comprehensive Owyhee Basin resident fish management plan. |
20536 | Develop Management Plan & Assess Fish and Wildlife of the Owyhee Basin - DV |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | Director, Biologist, Technician | $110,000 |
Fringe | @30% included in personnel | $0 |
Supplies | Fencing, pipe for water lines, water troughs, misc (trees, seed,), rental equipment | $80,000 |
Operating | $20,000 | |
Travel | To attend mtgs. For project leader and director | $7,000 |
Indirect | @26.6% | $57,722 |
Subcontractor | consultant to aid in Unified Watershed Assessment (UWA) on DVIR | $20,000 |
$294,722 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost | $294,722 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2000 budget request | $294,722 |
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
Bureau of Indian Affairs Forestry - Phoenix Office | purchase of Native trees | $30,000 | unknown |
Rural Soil Conservation Service | Technical assistance | $0 | unknown |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Possible ESA constraints for bull trout and redband trout.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Recommendation: Fund for one year to allow the project sponsors to better refine their project. Future long-term funding contingent on addressing deficiencies.Comments: This proposal has improved somewhat from last year, but still does not adequately address shortcomings that were identified in the previous review. The proposal includes the desirable objective of a watershed assessment, and protection of riparian habitats is critical for the persistence of native fishes. The proposed work is compatible with the Fish and Wildlife Plan. Most of the elements of this proposal would benefit from substantial elaboration. The authors need to develop quantifiable biologically measurable objectives, without which one cannot evaluate whether the work achieves its goals. More detail is needed on how sites will be evaluated and the standards for success.
Comment:
Comment:
Screening Criteria: yesTechnical Criteria: yes-
Programmatic Criteria: yes
Milestone Criteria: no- There are no milestones listed.
General Comments: The subcontractor is not appropriate in this budget.
Technically Sound? Yes
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Explain how these objectives are tied to overall objectives for trout restoration.Quantify the objectives (e.g. number of miles to be surveyed, number of springs protected).
How will the assessment relate to the proposed plans.
Develop a plan to monitor and evaluate project implementation and accomplishments.
High personnel and related costs.
Explain how this project fits into a watershed context.
Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$302,648 | $302,648 | $302,648 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website