FY 2000 proposal 199801005

Additional documents

TitleType
199801005 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titlePittsburg Landing,Capt. John Rapids, Big Canyon Acclimation Facilities
Proposal ID199801005
OrganizationNez Perce Tribe (NPT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameBruce M. Mcleod
Mailing addressP.O. Box 365 Lapwai, ID 83540
Phone / email2088437320 / Brucem@NezPerce.org
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 2000
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Snake Lower
Short descriptionSupplement natural production of Snake River fall chinook above Lower Granite Dam through acclimation and final rearing of Lyons Ferry yearling and subyearling at two sites on the Snake River and one site on the Clearwater River.
Target speciesSnake River fall chinook salmon
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1996 Pittsburg Landing assembled and operated, 114K yearlings released.
1997 Pittsburg Landing operated, 147K yearlings acclimated and released. Big Canyon assembled and operated, 198K yearlings and 253K subyearlings acclimated and released.
1998 Pittsburg Landing operated, 124K yearlings acclimated and released. Big Canyon operated, 61K yearlings acclimated and released. Capt. John Rapids constructed and operated, 133K yearlings acclimated and released.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
Lyons Ferry Hatchery LSRCP Funded Considered a "gene bank" for Snake River fall chinook stock; Provide yearlings and subyearlings for acclimation.
8335000 Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Will provide broodstock development for NPTH and will jointly contribute towards ESA delisting and rebuilding natural fall chinook production in the Clearwater Subbasin
9406900 A Spawning Habitat Model to Aid Recovery Plans for Snake R. Fall Chinook Investigates interactions influencing Columbia and Snake River spawning site selection to predict spawning habitat and improved production estimates for Snake River fall chinook.
9603301 Supplement and Enhance the Two Existing Stocks of Yakima River FallChinook Tests new supplementation techniques to increase natural production while maintaining genetic fitness to provide critical knowledge to resource managers throughout the Columbia River Basin.
9302900 Survival Estimates for Passage of Juv. Salmonids Through Dams and Reservior
9801004 M&E of Yearling Snake R. Fall Chinook Released Upstream of L. Granite Dam
9801005 Pittsburg Ldg.,Capt. John Rapids, & Big Canyon Fall Chinook Acclimation Fac
9102900 Life History and Survival of Fall Chinook Salmon in the Columbia R. Basin
20541 Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Studies
9403400 Assessing Summer and Fall Chinook Restoration in the Snake River Basin
9801003 Monitor and Evaluate Spawning Distribution of Snake R. Fall Chinook Salmon

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2000 cost
Personnel $154,000
Fringe $30,000
Supplies $53,000
Operating Vehicles, repair&maint., rent, utilities $61,000
Capital Begin replacement of major equip. as needed; pumps, alarm system, hoses. $56,000
NEPA Permanent Facility at Pittsburg Landing $20,000
Travel 80% for field crew per diem and mileage. $27,000
Indirect $75,000
Subcontractor $210,000
$686,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost$686,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2000 budget request$686,000
FY 2000 forecast from 1999$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: The project is dependent on the transfers of yearling and subyearling fall chinook from Lyons Ferry Hatchery. If egg collection or juvenile survival in the hatchery reduces yearlings below 900,000, one or more of the acclimation fac. may be impacted.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fund for one year
Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Fund for one year. Subsequent funding contingent on a comprehensive review of all supplementation efforts in the Lower Snake River.

Comments: This is an expensive (almost $700k) project for supplementation of the natural population of fall chinook upstream of Lower Granite Dam, using Lyons Ferry Hatchery stock. The proposal is basically for facility operating costs (apparently mostly salaries, USACOE having paid the facilities cost). This is an ongoing project (initiated 1996), which is projected to continue indefinitely, with steadily increasing costs. A major concern of the panel is whether supplementation efforts in the Lower Snake River are viable in the long run. Given past performance, the panel was skeptical about the likely success of such efforts. How is the problem of possible negative effects on wild fish being resolved? What are the ecosystems risks resulting from the project?


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:


Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Technical Criteria 1: Met? yes -

Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? yes - Very limited use of references.

Milestone Criteria 3: Met? no - No evidence of reports or reporting mechanisms.

Resource Criteria 4: Met? no - See #2.


Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

This project is important and should continue. We recommend funding at a reduced rate in order to meet other management priorities within this sub region. This project is covered under umbrella project #20541.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$729,635 $729,635 $729,635

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website