Year | Accomplishment |
0 |
Note: In most cases multiple years were required to accomplish a task and thus the year of accomplishment is misleading |
1985 |
Developed tagging techniques for PIT tags |
1986 |
Developed tagging equipment |
1987 |
Completed first phase development of an automated data entry station for tagging fish |
1986 |
Installed and evaluated first prototype PIT-tag interrogation system for juvenile salmon at McNary Dam |
1987 |
Began planning for and installing PIT-tag interrogation systems for juvenile salmon throughout the CRB |
1987 |
Installed and evaluated first prototype PIT-tag interrogation system for adult salmon at Lower Granite Dam using juvenile PIT-tag interrogation equipment |
1987 |
Completed first phase development of a prototype PIT-tag database for the CRB |
1988 |
Completed initial determination of the effects of PIT-tagging on juvenile salmonids |
1988 |
Completed development of the first fish diversion gates (slide gates) |
1992 |
Completed initial evaluation of technical feasibility of developing a passive acoustic miniature PIT tag |
1993 |
Compared overwinter survival of PIT-tagged and CW-tagged hatchery coho in a stream |
1994 |
Completed predator avoidance testing of PIT tagged vs other tag types |
1995 |
Conducted study to compare hatchery return rate of PIT-tagged and CW-tagged coho salmon |
1995 |
Installed and evaluated the first Separation-by-Code system at Lower Granite Dam |
1995 |
Installed and evaluated the first 2-way and 3-way fish diversion gates at Lower Granite Dam |
1996 |
Completed study to determine effects of electromagnetic fields on fish reproduction and behavior |
1996 |
Completed second phase of determining the effects of PIT tags on growth, behavior, and survival of different species of juvenile salmonids |
1996 |
Installed and evaluated the first prototype 400-kHz flat-plate interrogation system at Bonneville Dam |
1996 |
Installed and evaluated Separation-by-Code system at Little Goose Dam |
1996 |
Developed first prototype underwater towed PIT-tag interrogation system |
1997 |
Participated in the evaluation of the ISO-based prototype transceiver systems |
1997 |
Installed and evaluated a 400-kHz PIT-tag interrogation system for juvenile salmon in the Second Powerhouse at Bonneville Dam |
1997 |
Installed the first version of the computer program MULTIMON at CRB Dams |
1998 |
Installed and evaluated a 400-kHz PIT-tag interrogation system for adult salmon in the Adult Fish Facility at Bonneville Dam |
1998 |
Developed prototype 3-way side-to-side fish diversion gate |
1998 |
Directed fish tests for ISO-based PIT-tag systems for juvenile salmon and participated in ISO transition related planning and technical teams |
1998 |
Formed the multi-agency team for overseeing the development of the extended-range PIT-tag interrogation system for adult salmonids |
1999 |
Designed three styles of antenna housings for orifices. |
1999 |
Installed and evaluated the different orifice antenna housings in Cascades Island Fish Ladder and the exit ladder of the Adult Fish Facility at Bonneville Dam |
1999 |
Developed evaluation techniques and procedures for determining tag-reading efficiencies of extended-range interrogation systems in orifices |
1999 |
Obtained video documentation of fish response to PIT-tag antenna housings (no effect) and some preliminary results on proportion of fish using weir overflow vs weir orifice passage routes |
1999 |
Determined a suitable design and material for weir orifice PIT-tag antenna housing construction |
1999 |
Started field evaluation of the transceiver systems in fish ladders at Bonneville Dam |
1999 |
Finished development of the prototype ISO-based flat-plate system at Bonneville Dam. Began evaluation of system. |
2000 |
Formalize the Adult PIT-Tag Oversight Committee (APTOC) |
2000 |
Started development work to combine technology from different transceiver systems |
2000 |
Drafted the requirements document for transceiver systems to detect fish in orifices |
2000 |
Conducted evaluations of the prototype transceiver systems with fish and in the laboratory |
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
1. Develop an extended-range PIT-tag interrogation system for adult salmonids and other fish |
a. Purchase 25 antenna housings for the orifices as part of the Washington Shore Ladder installation at Bonneville Dam and start purchase of 53 more housings for 2002 installation.
|
3 |
$510,000 |
Yes |
1 |
b. Purchase 27 transceivers for the Washington Shore Ladder installation and start purchase of 53 more transceivers for 2002 installation.
|
3 |
$318,000 |
Yes |
1 |
c. Install and evaluate the electronic equipment and antenna housings at Bonneville Dam. Some of the evaluation will be performed in the laboratory
|
2 |
$453,810 |
|
1 |
d. Continue development of transceiver systems for orifices and if necessary, an interrogation system for weir overflows
|
2 |
$219,410 |
|
1 |
e. Perform APTOC related tasks (e.g., attend meetings, plan for future installations, write documents)
|
5 |
$57,490 |
|
2. Continue evaluation and maintenance of the prototype ISO-based flat-plate PIT-tag interrogation system at Bonneville Dam
|
a. Evaluate (e.g., fish tests) and maintain the flat-plate system |
2 |
$44,250 |
|
3. Transfer technology, provide information and assistance to users of PIT-tag technology
|
a. Transfer of technology developed by NMFS and provide assistance to users of PIT-tag technology |
5 |
$107,850 |
|
4. Project Planning, Administration, and Reporting
|
a. Perform administrative tasks (write contracts, workplans, management plans, and annual reports)
|
5 |
$126,075 |
|
In order to have extended-range systems ready to be installed into the fish ladders at Bonneville Dam during the dewatered period between December 2001 and February 2002, the equipment needs to be manufactured before that time period. Material and parts need to be ordered by the manufacturers 6 months ahead of time to meet this deadline. Thus, the procurement process needs to start in FY01. Therefore, in this FY01 budget we have included basically 50% of the costs for the equipment needed for 2002 in addition to 100% of the costs for the equipment needed for the Washington Shore installation. To get a price break based on numbers that will be needed for installations throughout the CRB, BPA will be issuing contracts with different delivery times.
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
There is no change in scope of work. Although the MainSys SRT supports the purchase of the equipment, we question why these costs were not anticipated in the FY 2000 proposal.