FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 198710001

Additional documents

TitleType

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleEnhance Umatilla River Basin Anadromous Fish Habitat
Proposal ID198710001
OrganizationConfederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameR. Todd Shaw
Mailing addressP.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801
Phone / email5412764109 / toddshaw@ctuir.com
Manager authorizing this projectGary James
Review cycleFY 2001 Ongoing
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Umatilla
Short descriptionIncrease natural production of summer steelhead, chinook salmon and coho salmon in the Umatilla River Basin.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1999 Three barriers addressed to provide fish passage to approximately 12 stream miles of previously inaccessible habitat.
1999 Installation of one rock vane.
2000 A total of 37 riparian easements secured since 1988.
2000 A total of 16 stream miles enhanced since 1988.
2000 A total of 20.44 miles of riparian livestock enclosure fencing constructed since 1988.
2000 A total of 5,900 pounds of native grasses seeded since 1988.
2000 A total of 51,000 native trees/shrubs planted since 1988.
2000 A total of 351 trees/root wads placed in stream since 1988.
2000 A total of 65 tree/root wad revetments installed since 1988.
2000 A total of 95 sediment retention structures constructed since 1994.
2000 A total of 17 log or boulder weirs constructed since 1988.
2000 A total of 39 log and boulder deflectors constructed since 1988.
2000 A total of ten cultural/archeological surveys and associated reports since 1988.
2000 A total of 88 photo points established since 1988.
2000 A total of 94 stream channel cross sections established and monitored since 1988.
2000 Four years of macroinvertebrate survey data (4 reports, 60 samples) since 1996.
2000 Stream temperature data from 21 sites since 1989.
2000 Suspended sediment data from 3 sites since 1989.
2000 Two bioengineering workshops since 1995.
2000 Five public scoping meetings since 1993.
2000 Numerous presentations, tours, etc.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Continue to identify detrimental land use practices and develop watershed-wide solutions to address habitat impacts in the Umatilla River Basin. a. Continue and complete a watershed assessment to assist with identification of fisheries habitat limiting factors and determination/prioritization of remedial measures. 3 years $10,000 Yes
b. Continue to conduct outreach efforts (public meetings, tours and presentations) to obtain input, identify landowner concerns, provide educational opportunities, and promote habitat restoration and protection. indefinite $20,790
2. Plan, design and propose fiscal year 2001 habitat enhancement projects. a. Prepare grant proposals and coordinate with local, state and federal resource agencies to develop cost-share projects. indefinite $5,198
b. Develop and secure riparian easements on private properties for proposed habitat enhancements. indefinite $10,395
c. Obtain necessary environmental clearances, including Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act cultural and archeological compliance, Sections 401 and 404 Federal Clean Water Act Permits and Section 7 U.S. Endangered Species Act consultations indefinite $25,988
d. Complete project design and layout. indefinite $15,592
e. Solicit bids and award subcontracts for fence construction, operated equipment, rock purchase and delivery, log purchase and delivery, native tree and shrub plantings, and noxious weed control. indefinite $25,988
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$136,000$144,000$121,000$128,500

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
3. Implement habitat enhancement projects on private properties in the Umatilla River Basin to achieve habitat recovery. a. Construct root wad and rock revetments, deflectors, vanes, weirs, etc. with an excavator. indefinite $42,720 Yes
b. Construct livestock exclusion fencing around project areas. indefinite $40,000 Yes
c. Install native willow cuttings and various bareroot tree and shrub species with an excavator alnog stream channel margins. indefinite $30,000 Yes
d. Seed native grasses and hand plant indigenous trees and shrubs in project areas. indefinite $44,003
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$192,500$204,500$171,000$181,500

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
4. Maintain habitat enhancements within project areas. a. Maintain livestock exclusion fencing. duration of riparian easement $13,278
b. Care of trees and shrubs, including watering, tree mat placement and tree shelter installation. approximately five years per individual project $14,431
c. Treat noxious weeds in existing project areas. duration of riparian easement $15,000 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$51,000$54,000$45,500$48,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
5. Collect baseline data and conduct post-project monitoring to identify habitat limiting factors and to quantify effects of habitat enhancement measures. a. Measure changes in channel morphology and vegetative responses to habitat enhancements at new and established photo point and stream channel transect sites. life of project $4,921
b. Conduct habitat surveys in proposed habitat enhancement project areas to obtain baseline physical data. life of project $6,860
c. Conduct biological inventories to determine pre and post-project anadromous fish presence. life of project $4,621
d. Sample macroinvertebrate populations to document macroinvertebrate response to enhanced versus unenhanced areas. life of project. $4,984
e. Monitor stream temperatures during summer months to determine effectiveness of habitat enhancements on cooling water temperatures. $4,825
f. Collect suspended sediment samples to obtain total suspended sediment, total dissolved sediment and conductivity data. life of project $1,116
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$33,000$35,000$29,000$31,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: 13 months (various personnel) $47,998
Fringe 30% $14,399
Supplies phone services, office supplies, duplication/printing, educational materials $9,828
Travel GSA vehicle lease, mileage, insurance, fuel and maintenance, and training and per diem $5,350
Indirect 34% of personnel & fringe, supplies and travel $26,376
NEPA included above in Personnel $0
Subcontractor Washington State University - Watershed Assessment $10,000
Personnel FTE: 10.5 months (biologist, assistant biologist, technician, seasonal) $22,534
Fringe 30% $6,760
Supplies fence materials, native trees/shrubs, native grass seed and field materials $45,000
Travel GSA vehicle lease, mileage, insurance, fuel and maintenance, and training and per diem $5,350
Indirect 34% of personnel, fringe benefits, construction materials, field materials and travel $27,079
Subcontractor fence construction, operated heavy equipment, rock & root wad transport and noxious weed control $50,000
Personnel FTE: 2.5 months (biologist, technician, seasonal) $9,214
Fringe 30% $2,764
Supplies tools, fence materials, tree mats and tree shelters $7,000
Travel GSA vehicle lease, vehicle mileage, vehicle insurance, fuel and vehicle maintenance $1,700
Indirect 34% of personnel, fringe benefits, supplies & materials and travel $7,031
Subcontractor noxious weed control $15,000
Personnel FTE: 4 months (biologist, assistant biologist, technician and seasonal) $11,908
Fringe 30% $3,572
Supplies lab fees for macroinvertebrate samples and suspended sediment samples $3,213
Travel GSA vehicle lease, vehicle mileage, vehicle insurance, fuel and vehicle maintenance $1,700
Indirect 34% of personnel, fringe benefits and travel $6,934
$340,710
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$340,710
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$340,710
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$315,000
% change from forecast8.2%
Reason for change in estimated budget

Budget is slightly higher than anticipated because of additional funds required for: (1) increased project personnel time to develop biological assessments for proposed enhancements, including proposed noxious weed treatments and 404 fill and removal permit activitities, due to recent ESA listings (compliance with ESA Section 7 Consultation and NMFS 4d rules), and (2) recent noxious weed invasions ( kochia and wild mustard) in the Wild Horse Creek Project Area, requiring additional subcontract dollars for increased herbicide applications. These weeds are currently out-competing native trees/shrubs and bunch grasses in this project area and more intensive weed treatments are required to restore this project area to a naturally functioning state.

Reason for change in scope

Scope has not changed, just more effort is required to develop projects consistent with ESA requirements and additional dollars are needed to treat noxious weeds.

Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:

The budget is slightly higher than anticipated because of additional funds required for: (1) increased project personnel time to develop biological assessments for proposed enhancements, including proposed noxious weed treatments and 404 fill and removal permit activities, due to recent ESA listings (compliance with ESA Section 7 Consultation and NMFS 4d rules), and (2) recent noxious weed invasions (kochia and wild mustard) in the Wild Horse Creek Project Area, requiring additional subcontract dollars for increased herbicide applications. These weeds are currently out-competing native trees/shrubs and bunch grasses in this project area and more intensive weed treatments are required to restore this project area to a naturally functioning state.

The scope has not changed, just more effort is required to develop projects consistent with ESA requirements and additional dollars are needed to treat noxious weeds. There is a real inconsistency with the application of NEPA by BPA on these types of projects. For this project, CTUIR is paying for maintenance on fencing and weed control whereas the Districts are not generally paying for ongoing O&M.

This SRT wants to raise a flag on the inconsistency among BPA projects for O&M/M&E requirements under the agreements that are being negotiated with landowners. Application of NEPA also has been inconsistent among BPA COTRs.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment:

Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$350,000 $350,000 $350,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website