FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 198712700
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Smolt Monitoring by Federal and Non-Federal Agencies |
| Proposal ID | 198712700 |
| Organization | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Pam Kahut/Michele Dehart |
| Mailing address | 45 SE 82nd Dr., Suite 100 Gladstone, OR 97027 |
| Phone / email | 5036505400 / Pam_Kahut@psmfc.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | Michele DeHart |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Daily passage data through the mainstem, Snake, Columbia and mid-Columbia rivers to facilitate fish passage management decisions, including Biological Opinion implementation, is collected daily. Sampling and marking occur at 8 sites of the larger region. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1999 | Collected, maintained real time passage, and GBT data for Columbia and Snake river monitoring sites. Data was available to all regional parties. |
| 1998 | Collected, maintained real time passage, and GBT data for Columbia and Snake river monitoring sites. Data was available to all regional parties. |
| 1997 | Collected, maintained real time passage, and GBT data for Columbia and Snake river monitoring sites. Data was available to all regional parties. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Smolt Monitoring-Lower Granite (WDFW) | a. Sample migrants daily in the sample system | $266,248 | ||
| b. Monitor Gas Bubble Symtoms according to FPC protocols | $0 | |||
| c. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| d. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocols | $0 | |||
| e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation | $0 | |||
| f. Conduct sampling for implementation of the Smolt Transportation Program | $0 | |||
| 2. Smolt Monitoring-McNary & Lower Monumental Dams. | a. Sample migrants daily in the Sample System | $399,932 | ||
| b. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| c. Monitor for Gas Bubble symptoms according to FPC protocols | $0 | |||
| d. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation | $0 | |||
| f. Conduct sampling for implementation of the Smolt Transportation Program | $0 | |||
| 3. Smolt Monitoring-Grande Ronde | a. Sample migrants daily in the Sample System | $254,858 | ||
| b. Apply PIT Tags | $0 | |||
| c. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| d. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| e. Monitor for gas bubble symptoms according to FPC protocols | $0 | |||
| f. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation | $0 | |||
| 4. Smolt Monitoring-Little Goose | a. Sample migrants daily in the Sample System | $117,614 | ||
| b. Monitor for Gas Bubble symptoms according to FPC protocols | $0 | |||
| c. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| d. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation | $0 | |||
| f. Conduct sampling for implementation of the Smolt Transportation Program | $0 | |||
| 5. Smolt Monitoring-Rock Island | a. Sample migrants daily in the Sample System. | $222,204 | ||
| b. Monitor for Gas Bubble symptoms according to FPC protocols | $0 | |||
| c. Apply PIT tags | $0 | |||
| d. Transmit data according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| e. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| f. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation | $0 | |||
| 6. Smolt Monitoring-John Day Dam | a. Sample migrants daily in the Sample System. | $329,507 | ||
| b. Monitor for Gas Bubble symptoms according to FPC protocols | $0 | |||
| c. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| d. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation | $0 | |||
| 7. Smolt Monitoring-Bonneville Dam | a. Sample migrants daily in the Bonneville I sample system | $295,758 | ||
| b. Monitor for Gas Bubble symptoms according to FPC protocols | $0 | |||
| c. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| d. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol | $0 | |||
| e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation | $0 | |||
| 8. Smolt Monitoring-Head of Lower Granite Reservoir & Lower Granite Dam (Idaho) | a. Provide daily trap catch data & smolt passage index | $409,312 | ||
| b. Determine travel time of PIT-tagged smolts from the pint of release to the smolt traps (index sites). | $0 | |||
| c. Provide an interrogation site for PIT-tagged smolts, marked on other projects, at the end of their migration in a riverine environment and the beginning of migration in a reservoir environment & intermediate site on the Salmon River. | $0 | |||
| d. Determine travel time for age 1 hatchery and wild chinook, hatchery steelhead, and wild steelhead smolts from the lower Salmon River. Also provide pit-tagged fish for survival estimates. | $0 | |||
| e. Determine PIT-tag detection rate at Lower Granite, Little Goose, Lower Monumental, and McNary dams during spring outmigration period | $0 | |||
| f. Correlate smolt migration rate with river flow for fish moving in riverine and reservoir environments during the spring outmigration period. | $0 | |||
| g. Evaluate timing of returning adult wild and natural steelhead crossing Lower Granite Dam. | $0 | |||
| h. Analyze data and produce an annual report. | $0 | |||
| i. Provide fish collection in Lower Granite Reservoir as requested by other agencies. | $0 | |||
| j. Provide a source of fish, in excess of SMP needs, for other research projects in the basin. | $0 | |||
| k. Maintain traps, boats, & other equipment prior to the field season. | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2,657,250 | $2,790,113 | $2,410,204 | $2,530,715 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $1,140,729 | |
| Fringe | $368,819 | |
| Supplies | $167,769 | |
| Travel | $81,263 | |
| Indirect | $382,673 | |
| Capital | $16,150 | |
| PIT tags | # of tags: 54,100 | $129,840 |
| Subcontractor | $8,190 | |
| $2,295,433 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $2,295,433 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $2,295,433 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $2,573,830 |
| % change from forecast | -10.8% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Primarily due to lower costs for PIT tags.
Reason for change in scope
No change in scope
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
The increase in this budget is due to cost of living increases. There is no change in scope of work. The information provided in the proposal is confusing, since the cost of the project increased even though the price of PIT tags decreased.Comment:
CBFWA comment: The increase in this budget is due to cost of living increases. There is no change in scope of work. The information provided in the proposal is confusing, since the cost of the project increased even though the price of PIT tags decreased.BPA response: Funding support for project 198712700 is accomplished through 3 BPA contracts. Two contracts are administered under project 198712700 (PSMFC and USFWS) and one under project 199008001. The PSMFC administered contract under Project 198712700 supports the multi-year SMP effort sponsored by the Fish Passage Center (FPC), representing the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Foundation and Columbia Basin Tribes. Funding of PIT tags and other fish marking support services for project 198712700 is provided through a separate BPA contract to PSMFC under project 199008001 and a separate contract to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under project 198712700. All program funds are allocated to project 1987127000 initially and then the costs for PIT tags are transferred to and obligated under 199008001.
The estimated FY2001 funding requirement of $2,295,433 is essentially the same level of funding made available for the same scope of work in FY2000. The budget for the 198712700 PSMFC FY2000 contract, totaling $2,066,036, was adjusted for $400,000 carry-over so only $1,666,036 in FY2000 funding was obligated. 198712700 USFWS contract obligated $44,017. $174,720 was obligated under 199008001 for purchase of 72,800 PIT tags.
| Funding Support Provided for Project 198712700 Work FY2000 | Funding Allocation Recommended for Project 198712700 Work FY2001 | |
|---|---|---|
| PSMFC Contract | $2,066,036* | $2,295,433 | USFWS Contract | 44,017 | PIT Tag Costs @ $2.40 per tag | $174,720 | $2,284,773 |
* $2,066,036 funding requirement was adjusted for $400,000 carry-over so only $1,666,036 additional funding authority from FY2000 funds was awarded.
Comment:
Bonneville supports increase due to inclusion of carry-forward in FY2000 budget.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $2,239,743 | $2,239,743 | $2,239,743 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website