FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 198907201

Additional documents

TitleType

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleIndependent Scientific Advisory Board Support
Proposal ID198907201
OrganizationDepartment of Energy/Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE/ORNL)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameCharles C. Coutant
Mailing addressORNL/ESD/ PO Box 2008/Bldg. 1505: Mail Stop 6036 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6036
Phone / email8655766830 / coutantcc@ornl.gov
Manager authorizing this projectMike Schiewe (NMFS), Chip McConnaha (NPPC)
Review cycleFY 2001 Ongoing
Province / SubbasinSystemwide / Systemwide
Short descriptionProvide support through contract with DOE for Dr. Charles Coutant for the Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB), for scientific advice to the NWPPC’s FWP and NMFS's ESA programs.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
2000 Completion of 2 reviews to date including Artificial Production Review performance standards, and The Dalles spill research program. Presently working on a comparison of models (PATH, CRI, EDT, ICBEMP, COHORT) and an estuary review.
1999 Completion of 7 reviews requested by NMFS, the Council, and Congress including review of the Corps Capital Construction Program (adult passage and scientific overview), a scientific synthesis of recovery plans, and NMFS's Anadromous Fish Appendix.
1998 Completion of 8 reviews requested by NMFS, the Council, and Congress including review of the Corps Capital Construction Program, PIT tag workplan, and the Multi-Species Framework Scientific Principles.
1997 Completion of 8 reviews requested by NMFS and the Council including reviews of downstream passage for salmon, PIT tag research, NMFS Waiver of Dissolved Gas Standard, ecological impacts of BiOp flow provisions on Hungry Horse and Libby resident fishes.
1996 Review of the Fish and Wildlife Program. The Council Report 96-6 by Independent Scientific Group: Return to the River.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1) Provide scientific review and recommendations to the Council and NMFS as requested. ongoing $100,027
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2002FY 2003
$100,000$100,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: 446 hrs x $78.75 $35,122
Fringe 47.85% $16,806
Travel 11 trips @ $135/day @ 4 days per trip; $1,800 airfare/travel Oak Ridge, TN to Portland or Seattle $25,740
Indirect General and Administrative Expense; 41.63% for labor; 2.88% for travel. $22,359
$100,027
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$100,027
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$100,027
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$100,000
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:

There is no change in scope or budget.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment: