FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199202200
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| Columbia Plateau: Yakima Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
| Columbia Plateau: Yakima Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Physiological assessment of wild and hatchery juvenile salmonids. |
| Proposal ID | 199202200 |
| Organization | National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, DOC (NMFS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Walton Dickhoff |
| Mailing address | 2725 Montlake Blvd. East Seattle, WA 98112-2097 |
| Phone / email | 2068603234 / walton.w.dickhoff@noaa.gov |
| Manager authorizing this project | Walton Dickhoff |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Yakima |
| Short description | Characterize the physiology of salmon reared under conventional and natural-rearing systems in the Yakima supplementation project and compare them to naturally rearing fish to improve hatchery operations . |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 92 | selection of collection sites in the Yakima River Basin and standardization of collection methods. |
| 93 | collection of physiology samples from naturally rearing spring Chinook in the Yakima River, conduct experiment on effect of growth rate on migration rate of Yakima River fish Demonstration of the relationship between high growth rate and SAR. |
| 94 | collection of physiology samples from naturally rearing spring Chinook in the Yakima River, analysis of samples and data from Yakima River samples |
| 95 | collection of physiology samples from naturally rearing spring Chinook in the Yakima River, analysis of samples and data from Yakima River samples |
| 96 | analysis of samples and data from Yakima River samples |
| 97 | analysis of samples and data from Yakima River samples |
| 98 | analysis of samples and data from Yakima River samples Characterization of physiology of wild spring chinook salmon, which differ significantly from hatchery reared fish. |
| 99 | Collect a 2nd year of samples from OCT and SNT fish from the Yakima hatchery and two separate remote acclimation sites analysis of physiology samples and from hatchery and wild fish at the hatchery and during outmigration. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Conduct research | a. Research sampling, data analysis and reporting. | 1 | $156,629 | |
| 2. Conduct research | b. Laboratory analyses. | 1 | $153,395 | Yes |
| 3. Conduct research | c. Comparison of wild and hatchery fish stress response. | 1 | $40,000 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $350,000 | $350,000 | $350,000 | $350,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 2 | $59,954 |
| Fringe | $26,985 | |
| Supplies | $17,244 | |
| Travel | $7,092 | |
| Indirect | $45,354 | |
| Subcontractor | $193,395 | |
| $350,024 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $350,024 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $350,024 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $350,000 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
There is no change in scope of work. The reduction in budget more accurately reflects anticipated costs.Comment:
Comment:
Comment: