FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199204000

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Redfish Lake sockeye salmon captive broodstock rearing and research
Proposal ID	199204000
Organization	National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Tom Flagg
Mailing address	PO Box 130 Manchester, WA 98353
Phone / email	2068427181 / tom.flagg@noaa.gov
Manager authorizing this project	Dr. Robert Iwamoto
Review cycle	FY 2001 Ongoing
Province / Subbasin	Mountain Snake / Salmon
Short description	Incubate and rear Redfish Lake sockeye salmon captive broodstocks. Provide pre-spawning adults, eyed eggs, and juveniles to aid recovery of this ESA-listed endangered stock in Idaho.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment
1992	Initiated broodstocks.
1993	Continued broodstock rearing, refined rearing strategies.
1994	Spawned 1991-brood, produced 48,000 eyed eggs.
1995	Continued broodstock rearing.
1996	Spawned 1993-broods, produced 413,600 eyed eggs in additional to 80 adults released to spawn in Redfish Lake.
1997	Spawned 1993- and 1994-broods, produced 168,000 eyed eggs in addition to 40 adults released to spawn in Redfish Lake.
1998	Spawned 1994-brood, produced 47,000 eyed eggs.
1999	Spawned 1996-brood, produced 65,400 eyed eggs.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor
ESA-listed endangered Snake River sockeye salmon captive broodstock F1-F3 generation rearing.	Rear and spawn captive broodstock	FY92-05 and beyond	$560,000

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

FY 2004	FY 2005	FY 2002	FY 2003
$648,300	$680,600	$588,000	$617,400

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2001 cost
Personnel	FTE: 2.3	$127,700
Fringe		$48,400
Supplies		$183,500
Travel		$8,800
Indirect		$92,200
Subcontractor		$99,400
		$560,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 cost	$560,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2001 budget request	$560,000
FY 2001 forecast from 2000	$525,000
% change from forecast	6.7%

Reason for change in estimated budget

1) Inflation adjustments were not made in the FY2000 forecast, 2) cost of freshwater rearing facility lease is anticipated to increase.

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no

Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:

The increase in budget is due to inflation adjustments that were not made in the FY 2000 forecast and the cost of the freshwater rearing facility lease is anticipated to increase. There is no change in scope of work.

REVIEW:
NWPPC Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment:

Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review. Budget increase will depend on step review

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review

Funding category:
expense

Date:
May 2005

FY05 NPCC start of year:	FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:	FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$737,242	$980,000	$980,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website