FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199401500

Additional documents

TitleType

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleIdaho Fish Screen Improvement - O-M
Proposal ID199401500
OrganizationIdaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NamePatrick Marcuson
Mailing addressPO Box 1336 Salmon, ID 83467
Phone / email2087566022 / pmarcuso@idfg.state.id.us
Manager authorizing this projectPat Marcuson
Review cycleFY 2001 Ongoing
Province / SubbasinMountain Snake / Salmon
Short descriptionEnhance passage of juvenile and adult fish in Idaho's anadromous fish corridors by consolidation and elimination of irrigation diversions. Minimize adverse fish impacts of irrigation diversion dams, screen pump intakes and screen all irrigation canals.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1993 Build Anadromous Fish Screen Shop
1994 Equipment purchased and screen construction to NMFS
1997 Constructed fish screens on consolidated canals, three fish friendly diversions, 20 pump intake screens, 2 infiltration screens and 17 headgeates.
1998 Constructed fish screens, 4 fish friendly diversions, safety fences, canal eliminations and two stream reconnects, 20 pump intake screens and 12 headgate installations.
1999 Treated 62 sites, replaced 11 fish screens to NMFS criteria, eliminated 5 fish screens, installed 11 new screens on previously unscreened ditches, eliminated 2 diversion dams, installed 40 pump screens, 6 headgates, two safety fences and
provided 29 technical assistance. Saved 109,500 chinook, 15,150 steelhead and 600 bull trout at 35 Salmon River fish screens.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Complete surveys, designs, of Idaho's Anadromous fish corridors a. Complete topographic surveys of unscreened and obsolete fish screen sites. 4 $12,000 Yes
b. Design appropriate fish screen headgate and fish friendly diversion at each site. 4 $0
c. Contract construction at each site. 4 $0
2. Reduce the number of gravel push-up diversion dams by consolidation and elimination of irrigation ditches. a. Identify potential consolidation and ditch elimination sites. 4 $2,719
b. Attain easements and flow agreements. 4 $0
c. Design consolidations and replacement of surface water diversions to ground water systems. 4 $0
3. Maximize any rearing habitat in appropriate irrigation canals. a. Evaluate fish habitat in irrigation ditches and in immediate stream fishery. 4 $2,715
b. Locate fish screen to maximize rearing habitat. 4 $2,715
4. Reconnect streams to anadromous fish corridors. a. Locate streams providing historic spawning and rearing for anadromous fish. 4 $2,717
b. Determine if adequate water attracts anadromous fish. 4 $2,717
c. Design 4 $0
5. Install and evaluate alternative fish screens. a. Look for sites for infiltration and other simpler means of saving fish from irrigation practices. 4 $2,717 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$14,150$14,150$28,300$28,300

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Construction & installation of all unscreened gravity and pump intakes in Idaho's anadromous fish corridors. a. Fabricate and install fish screen and associated components at each site. 4 $400,000 Yes
b. Locate, measure, design, build and install fish screens on pump intakes. 4 $26,087
2. Reduce the number of gravel push-up diversion dams by consolidation and elimination of irrigation ditches. a. Replace surface water diversions to ground water systems. $50,000
b. Construct by contract and IDFG crew. 4 $200,000 Yes
3. Maximize any rearing habitat in appropriate irrigation canals. a. Locate fish screen to maximize rearing habitat. 4 $10,000
4. Reconnect streams to anadromous fish corridors. a. Implement the reconnect. 4 $17,139
b. Install fish screens where needed. 4 $135,089 Yes
5. Install alternative fish screens. a. Construct and install. 4 $30,000
6. Make accessible fish screens safer to humans and domestic pets. a. Fence accessible screen sites. 4 $2,500
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$435,407$435,407$870,815$870,815

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Complete surveys, designs, construction and installations of all unscreened, obsolete gravity and pump intakes in Idaho's anadromous fish corridors. a. Maintain fish screens and by-pass pipe operation. 20+ $0
b. Maintain occasional pump screen. 4 $2,500
2. Reduce the number of gravel push-up diversion dams by consolidation and elimination of irrigation ditches. a. Check integrity and fix deficiencies. 4 $48,391
3. Reconnect streams to anadromous fish corridors. a. Fix deficiencies. 4 $2,800
b. Maintain screens. 20+ $1,766
4. Install and evaluate alternative fish screens. a. Maintain alternative fish screens. 20+ $15,000
5. Make accessible fish screens safer to humans and domestic pets. a. Repair fences as needed. 20+ $500
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$35,478$35,478$70,957$70,957

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Complete surveys, designs, construction and installations of all unscreened, obsolete gravity and pump intakes in Idaho's anadromous fish corridors. a. Check selected screens for numbers and kinds of fish returned to stream. 20+ $5,518
b. Monitor presence or absence of fish down canal of fish screen. 20+ $3,500
2. Reduce the number of gravel push-up diversion dams by consolidation and elimination of irrigation ditches. a. Evaluate and adjust as needed for proper function. 20+ $3,600
3. Maximize any rearing habitat in appropriate irrigation canals. a. Electrofish or snorkel. 20+ $3,500
b. Observation of fish utilizing irrigation canals. 20+ $4,000
4. Reconnect streams to anadromous fish corridors. a. Resurvey fish presence or absence in re-connected stream. 4 $5,910
5. Install and evaluate alternative fish screens. a. Monitor and evaluate function of alternative fish screens. 4 $3,900
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$14,964$14,964$29,928$29,928

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: .50 fisheries tech. (wages primarily paid from other sources) $6,638
Fringe One fisheries technician on BPA grant $2,300
Travel $1,750
Indirect Indirect rate on personnel and operations only $5,612
Other Professional services $12,000
Personnel FTE: .65 fisheries tech. (wages come for other sources) $17,139
Fringe $5,929
Travel $1,750
Indirect Indirect rate on personnel and operations only $6,087
Capital $629,840
Subcontractor Subcontractors in this program are state bid awards for cement work $210,070
Personnel FTE: .20 Fish tech. (most wages from cost share sources) $1,350
Fringe $466
Supplies $54,000
Travel $1,750
Indirect Indirect rate on personnel and operating only $13,391
Personnel FTE: .75 fisheries tech. (most wages come from other sources) $16,543
Fringe $5,725
Travel Indirect rate on personnel and operations only $1,750
Indirect $5,910
$1,000,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$1,000,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$1,000,000
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$1,000,000
% change from forecast0.0%
Reason for change in estimated budget

None

Reason for change in scope

None

Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:

There is no change in scope or budget.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment:


REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website