FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199404300

Additional documents

TitleType

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleMonitor, Evaluate, Research and Model the Lake Roosevelt Fishery
Proposal ID199404300
OrganizationSpokane Tribe of Indians (STOI)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameKeith Underwood
Mailing addressPO Box 100 Wellpinit, WA 99040
Phone / email5092587020 / keithund@spokanetribe.com
Manager authorizing this projectKeith Underwood
Review cycleFY 2001 Ongoing
Province / SubbasinInter-Mountain / Lake Roosevelt
Short descriptionMonitor and evaluate the performance of hatchery fish. Develop and maintain a model able to predict the effects of hydro-operations and management actions on the lake ecosystem and fishery. Use model results to refine a fisheries management plans.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1988 From 1988 to date, collected baseline limnological, biological and fisheries data to allow for adaptive management of the hatcheries and hydrosystem.
1988 Established coordinated fisheries co-management activities among WDFW, CCT and STI on Lake Roosevelt to facilitate coordinated management activities.
1988 Established communcation with local and regional Columbia River stakeholders through special interest groups (i.e., CBFWA, NWPPC, Lake Roosevelt Forum) to include public in fisheries management process.
1990 Established hatchery reared kokanee salmon and rainbow trout stocking goals based on food (zooplankton) availability. Set harvest goals based on stocking goals. Articulated the first set of biological objectives for the lake.
1990 Established new walleye harvest regulations to maintain a harvestable population. Walleye condition was low suggesting the walleye population was too large for the available food. Regulation changed age and size structure of walleye population.
1991 Spokane Tribal Hatchery began operation. First hatchery with primary purpose of providing kokanee salmon and rainbow trout for harvest in Lake Roosevelt.
1991 Annually monitor and evaluate the performance of fish from the hatcheries. Based on data collected, hatcheries stocking strategies are adjusted to maximize angler harvest and minimize impacts to wild native species.
1992 Sherman Creek Hatchery began operation (managed by WDFW). Hatchery is designed to collect eggs from kokanee returning as adults to spawn at Sherman Creek.
1992 Established time frame when kokanee salmon are physiologically predisposed to forming an olfactory imprinted memory of the water in which they are reared suggesting that imprinting could be used to enhance the return of kokanee salmon to Sherman Creek.
1992 Discovered that kokanee exhibit weak smoltification characteristics, both physiologically and behaviorally, during their first year of life suggesting that kokanee salmon are likely to entrain during the spring of each year.
1993 Surveyed the benthic macroinvertebrate community and estimated terrestrial macroinvertebrate deposition. Discovered benthic and terrestrial macroinvertebrate communities were a limited, insignificant source of food for fish.
1993 Established a relationship between water retention time and zooplankton production. Water retention times greater than 30 days is necessary to maximize zooplankton density and biomass.
1994 Participated in human health studies that investigated toxin loads (i.e., mercury, PCBs, dioxins and furans) in tissue of walleye, rainbow trout, and kokanee. Also, conducted surveys to estimate fish consumption by anglers. Identified minimal risk.
1994 The first year adult kokanee spawners returned to Sherman Cr. as a result of imprinting with artificial chemicals.
1994 Hatcheries changed kokanee stocking strategies from fry to yearling releases. Fry provided less than one percent return to harvest and egg collection facilities. Studies suggest yearlings out perform fry by 5 to 10 percent.
1994 Changed stocking period of net pens and hatchery reared rainbow trout from April to June. This change minimizes entrainment by releasing fish while the lake is refilling instead of drawing down.
1994 Established the need to model the effects of hydro-operations and management actions on the ecosystem and fishery of Lake Roosevelt in order to create compatible management objectives between lower and upper river stakeholders.
1995 Established interim Lake Roosevelt hydro-operations rules. If rules are followed fish entrainment will be limited and food production will be enhanced providing for more and bigger fish in the creel.
1995 Became member of the TMT to participate with in-season hydro-operations decisions process in an attempt to make hydro-operations which benefit salmon while limiting impacts to Lake Roosevelt ecology.
1997 Intensified data collection of lower trophic levels (i.e., phytoplankton, periphyton and zooplankton) to a level appropriate for creating a model of Lake Roosevelt ecosystem.
1998 Began providing water quality data to the Lake Roosevelt Water Quality Council for human health considerations.
1998 Assisted the Lake Roosevelt Water Quality Council with collection of fish tissues for metal, dioxin and furan toxicity tests.
1998 In cooperation with the Sturgeon Project indexed the Lake Roosevelt sturgeon population. Results suggest sturgeon have not recruited to adult stage within Lake Roosevelt for over 20-25 years.
1998 Performed initial pelagic hydroacoustic surveys and mapped littoral habitats of the lake.
1998 Developed new kokanee harvest regulation, limiting angler harvest to hatchery origin kokanee only. Wild origin kokanee appear to be depressed and in need of protection from harvest.
1999 Conducted a bioenergics model run on Lake Roosevelt kokanee salmon and rainbow trout. Determined that food (zooplankton) was not limiting. This information refocused us on entrainment and predation as most likely the main limiting factors.
1999 Completed a walleye predation study on kokanee released from Sherman Creek Hatchery. This study estimated that from10 to 20% of the kokanee released were consumed by walleye within the first 3 weeks of release.
1999 Identified zooplankton production is greater near shore (Z=17m) than at the thalwag of the lake. Historical and current reservoir zooplankton biomass estimates are based on thalwag sampling and are therefore conservative.
1999 Completed a rainbow trout net pen environmental impact assessment. No significant impacts were identified.
1999 Mapped shoreline macrohabitat at 8 sites in Lake Roosevelt.
1999 Confirmed through a series of studies that Lake Roosevelt kokanee salmon, rainbow trout and other fishes production is primarily limited due to entrainment.
1999 Based on matched release studies of kokanee imprinted to artificial chemicals and kokanee not imprinted at Sherman Creek. Determined that the use of artificial imprinting chemicals did not significantly improve adult returns of kokanee to Sherman Creek.
1999 Began evaluating redband trout performance in the Lake Roosevelt net pen program, in an attempt to find stocks of indigenous rainbow trout, which perform in the fishery and lend themselves to artificial propagation.
1999 Began testing the performance of Kootenay Lake kokanee performance in the Spokane Tribal Hatchery, Sherman Creek Hatchery and Lake Roosevelt fishery. Our goal is to transition fully to indigenous Kootenay Lake kokanee within the next couple of years.
1999 Completed a mark-recapture study to estimate the walleye population. This information is used for estimating predation of hatchery origin fish during the first three weeks of release.
2000 Imposed new kokanee harvest regulation to limit hooking mortality of wild kokanee. Further limited angler induced mortality of wild kokanee salmon.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Create an informed Lake Roosevelt Fishery Management Plan with hydro-operation recommendations. a. Develop management objectives for the Lake Roosevelt fishery and ecosystem in cooperation with appropriate Columbia River stakeholders. 1 $10,000 Yes
b. Run model with various hydro-operations and management action scenarios to identify steps necessary to achieve management objectives. 2.5 $40,000 Yes
c. Identify and evaluate constraints (i.e., economic, biologic, social) limiting our ability to reach the management objectives. 1 $0 Yes
d. Adjust management objectives to match realistic actions based on constraints 1 $0 Yes
e. Write and publish document articulating the Lake Roosevelt Fishery Management Plan with hydro-operation recommendations for NWPPC review and approval. 1 $0 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2002FY 2003
$150,000$100,000

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Refine analyses of trophic interactions and effects of various parameters on trophic levels. a. Conduct multivariate or other appropriate statistical analyses with multiyear fisheries and lower trophic level data sets to confirm working hypotheses. 3 $50,000 Yes
b. Scientific peer review analyses. 3 $10,000 Yes
c. Write studies for publication in professional journals. 3 $40,000 Yes
2. Maintain current databases in order to validate, refine and maintain the Lake Roosevelt Ecology Model. a. Collect water quality, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and macroinvertebrate community data to monitor temporal-spatial physical, chemical and population indices. in perpetuity $100,000 Yes
b. Estimate population size and habitat use (e.g., water temp use) of pelagic fish species by way of mobile hydroacoustics surveys. in perpetuity $30,000 Yes
c. Monitor temporal-spatial distribution of newly released hatchery fish to estimate timing of vulnerability to entrainment and predation. 3 $10,000 Yes
d. Measure littoral habitat type and availability. 2 $50,000 Yes
3. Validate and refine the Lake Roosevelt Ecology Model a. Use collected data to validate the accuracy of the Lake Roosevelt Ecology Model. 2 $10,000 Yes
b. Identify model weaknesses and recommend solutions. 2 $10,000 Yes
c. Make refinements to model based on recommendations. 2 $5,000 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$100,000$100,000$150,000$100,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Monitor and evaluate impacts of hatchery origin fish on wild fish and lower trophic levels of Lake Roosevelt. a. Conduct fishery surveys through electro-fishing, gillnetting and beach seining during three seasons to assess wild and hatchery fish abundance, feeding habits, habitat use, growth, age structure and food availability. In perpetuity $110,584 Yes
b. Maintain a master data set of current and historical data projects conducted on Lake Roosevelt and its tributaries. In perpetuity $30,000
c. Conduct analyses sufficient to create an informed recommendations as to hatchery stocking strategies which minimize impacts to wild fish and lower trophic levels. In perpetuity $63,000
Monitor and evaluate various stocks of kokanee salmon and rainbow trout performance in Lake Roosevelt a. Mark a minimum of 40,000 hatchery origin rainbow trout with anchor tags. 4 $27,000
b. Mark a minimum of 300,000 hatchery origin kokanee salmon with coded wire tags and adipose clips. 4 $63,000
c. Conduct paired release studies of hatchery kokanee salmon and rainbow trout to determine the best stocks and release strategies which maximize harvest and egg collection will minimizing negative effects to wild fish and entrainment. 6 $160,000
d. Monitor temporal-spatial distribution of newly released hatchery fish to estimate timing of vulnerability to entrainment and predation. in perpetuity $92,000
e. Estimate walleye population size with mark-recapture studies to determine predator abundance. 4 $8,000
Monitor and evaluate the performance of hatchery and wild fish in the Lake Roosevelt fishery. a. Conduct Lake Roosevelt creel surveys to estimate angle pressure, harvest and catch. Also evaluate the performance of hatchery and wild fish in the fishery. in perpetuity $155,000
Monitor and evaluate the performance of hatchery and wild fish in the Lake Roosevelt fishery. a. Conduct a limited Banks Lake creel survey to estimate angle pressure, harvest and catch of kokanee salmon from the Spokane Tribal Hatchery. 2 $40,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$800,000$800,000$748,584$750,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel $20,000
Fringe 28% of Salaries $5,600
Supplies Office Supplies $2,000
Travel Meeting Rooms $2,000
Indirect 20% of contract less capital equipment and subcontracts $5,920
Subcontractor Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $7,240
Subcontractor Colville Confederated Tribes $7,240
Personnel $80,000
Fringe 28% of salaries $22,400
Supplies Fixatives, bottles and sampling equipment $4,000
Travel Repair/maintenance and fuel for boats and vehicles $8,000
Indirect 20% of contract less capital equipment and subcontracts $22,880
Subcontractor Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $85,720
Subcontractor Eastern Washington University Phytoplankton $2,000
Subcontractor Spokane Tribal Labs - Nutrients $5,000
Subcontractor Colville Confederated Tribes $75,000
Subcontractor Portland State University $10,000
Personnel $184,277
Fringe 28% of salaries $51,597
Supplies Tags, gill nets, jars, office, lab gloves, computer software, etc. $44,445
Travel Training, repair/maintenance and fuel for vehicles and boats, creel mileage, per diem, etc. $27,468
Indirect 20% of contract less capital equipment and subcontracts. $64,533
Subcontractor Eastern Washington University $49,735
Subcontractor Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $133,887
Subcontractor Colville Confederated Tribes $177,760
Other Utilities / Communications, and insurance $14,882
$1,113,584
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$1,113,584
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$1,113,584
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$900,000
% change from forecast23.7%
Reason for change in estimated budget

Although the 2001 budget request is greater than the budget forecasted in 1999, this 2001 budget request does reflect a significant reduction from that contracted in 2000. The 2000 budget was 1.5 million and the current 2001 budget is 1.1 million resulting in a 26% reduction from the 2000 budget. We have made an honest effort to meet our originally forecasted target however, due to the fact that the model and data collection effort are behind schedule, the budget is greater than expected. We are unwilling to abandon our data collection effort prior to having the model up and running. We believe it is foolish to stop data collect activities prior to knowing whether the model can answer questions in place of empirical data. Furthermore, an additional year of intensive data collection will refine model variables and our understanding of trophic relationships, ultimately providing for stronger models and understanding of the biological systems in which we are working.

Reason for change in scope

No change is scope of work.

Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

Tasks delayed, objective 4 model (100K) is stopped, may go into 04 rather than 03. Management plan won't go until 05 because of need of model. Contract year offset from fiscal year.
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:


REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$950,000 $950,000 $950,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website