FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199505700

Additional documents

TitleType

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleSouthern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation
Proposal ID199505700
OrganizationIdaho Department of Fish and Game AND Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (IDFG/SBT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameMichele Beucler And Anders Mikkelsen
Mailing addressP.O. Box 25 AND P.O. Box 306 Boise, ID 83707 AND Fort Hall, ID 83203
Phone / email2083342596 / mbeucler@idfg.state.id.us
Manager authorizing this projectMichele Beucler AND Anders Mikkelsen
Review cycleFY 2001 Ongoing
Province / SubbasinUpper Snake / Mainstem Snake
Short descriptionProtect, enhance, and maintain wildlife habitats to mitigate construction losses for Palisades, Minidoka, Anderson Ranch, and Black Canyon hydroelectric projects (a total of 52,292 unannualized HU). This project has been ongoing since 1997.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1997 Protected and/or enhanced 2,013 HU (on approx. 11,362 acres)
1998 Protected and/or enhanced 6,051 HU (on 5,008 acres); Maintained above 2,013 HU
1999 Protected 6,974 HU (on 2,757 acres); Maintained above 8,064 HU
2000 Protect approximately 2,000 HU (on 2,450 acres; acquisition in progress); Enhance approx. 800 HU (project being developed)

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Conduct pre-acquisition activities necessary to protect 40,719 HU of wildlife habitat by 2010. This accounts for 75% of the unannualized construction losses for Palisades, Minidoka, Anderson Ranch, and Black Canyon. a. Identify willing landowners from whom to buy easements and/or fee-titles 10 $47,336
b. Consult and coordinate throughout process with the NWPPC, BPA, CBFWA, Tribes, local governments, etc. 10 $65,674
c. Complete due diligence investigations and NEPA compliance 10 $62,837 Yes
d. Seek approval from IDFG, SBT, CBFWA, BPA, etc. for program consistency 10 $32,837
2. Investigate opportunities for enhancement projects on existing public lands to mitigate 14,113 HU by 2010. This accounts for 25% of the unannualized construction losses for Palisades, Minidoka, Anderson Ranch, and Black Canyon. a. Determine viability of proposed project 10 $32,837
b. Determine cost-share cooperators' roles when appropriate 10 $32,837
c. Develop MOA among partners when necessary 10 $32,837
d.Consult and coordinate throughout process with the NWPPC, BPA, CBFWA, Tribes, local governments, etc. 10 $32,837
e. Seek approval from IDFG, SBT, CBFWA, BPA, etc. for program consistency 10 $32,837
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2003FY 2005FY 2004FY 2002
$384,139$395,750$389,901$378,462

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Protect 40,719 HU of wildlife habitat by 2010 by acquiring easements or fee-title. This accounts for 75% of the unannualized construction losses for Palisades, Minidoka, Anderson Ranch, and Black Canyon. a. Secure fee-title and/or easement. 10 $5,643,359
b. Complete HEP report and management plan. 10 $29,947
2. Enhance 14,113 HU on protected wildlife habitat by 2010. This accounts for 25% of the remaining unannualized construction losses for Palisades, Minidoka, Anderson Ranch, and Black Canyon. a. Exclude livestock (or intensively manage when it can benefit wildlife) 10 $3,339
b. Seed and/or transplant native plant species 10 $3,339 Yes
c. Manipulate water and water control structures to mimic natural water regimes 10 $3,339
d. Remove undesirable and exotic plant species using biological, mechanical, or chemical methods 10 $3,340 Yes
e. Compare baseline with enhanced HU and credit BPA appropriate number 10 $3,340
f. Manage public access sites to minimize human disturbance. 10 $3,340
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003FY 2005FY 2004FY 2002
$3,500,000$3,500,000$3,500,000$3,500,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Maintain HU on all protected and enhanced areas (i.e., protect and manage for target species habitats). There will be no net loss of HU. a. Control trespass livestock grazing (primarily using fencing). 100 $130,000 Yes
b. Control noxious weeds using mechanical, biological and chemical methods. 100 $270,000 Yes
c. Restore permanent vegetative cover to provide habitat for target species. 10 $50,000 Yes
d. Manage vegetation to provide optimal habitat for target species. 100 $106,951
e. Control soil erosion. 10 $20,000 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003FY 2005FY 2004FY 2002
$884,549$1,201,445$1,041,818$729,605

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Monitor plant and animal species and communities on all properties in perpetuity and evaluate management effectiveness. a. Conduct baseline inventories of wildlife and plant species and communities, and develop GIS databases. 100 $20,000 Yes
b. Conduct HEPs every 5 years to quantify habitat value changes. 100 $0
c. Conduct various wildlife surveys at regular intervals (determined by species and survey method). 100 $3,487 Yes
d. Conduct various vegetation surveys at regular intervals (determined by species and survey method). 100 $3,486 Yes
e. Continuously monitor public use. 100 $1,500
f. Amend and update management plans. 100 $2,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2003FY 2005FY 2004FY 2002
$24,000$32,800$28,400$19,900

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: 3.7 $145,090
Fringe rate varies with job titles and agencies $35,237
Supplies office, field, vehicle lease and repair, computers, title reports and other pre-acquisition costs $45,200
Travel CBFWA and Work Group coordination, training, site visits $26,746
Indirect approx. 28% of personnel and operating $83,096
NEPA cultural surveys (subcontracted) $15,000
Subcontractor appraisals $12,500
Subcontractor BPA appraisal review $1,500
Subcontractor environmental surveys $8,000
Subcontractor GIS digitizing $500
Personnel FTE: 1.0 $22,215
Fringe rate varies with job titles and agencies $5,065
Supplies herbicide, seed, ATV gas and repair, fence repair $6,080
Travel 4,000 mi @ .33/mi, per diem @$100/day $3,320
Indirect approx 28% $10,914
Capital Fee-title and/or easement $5,636,449
Subcontractor native seed planting $800
Subcontractor herbicide applications $1,500
Other options, closing costs $7,000
Personnel FTE: 3.34 $86,503
Fringe rate varies with job titles and agencies $32,774
Supplies Tools and equipment, seeds for restoration, weed control and fencing supplies, vehicle leases, etc. $206,965
Travel Sites are located across southern Idaho $11,700
Indirect approx 28% $94,659
Capital Vehicles and motorized equipment, GPS units, storage shed, computer equipment, etc. $111,650
Subcontractor Agricultural equipment and services for planting permanent vegetation. $32,700
Personnel FTE: 0.5 (includes both IDFG and SBT personnel) $5,400
Fringe rate varies with job titles and agencies $1,782
Supplies Maps, aerial photos, GPS units, miscellaneous mensuration equipment $500
Travel Sites are located across southern Idaho $1,125
Indirect 28% overhead rate $6,666
Subcontractor GIS services and database management assistance $15,000
$6,673,636
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$6,673,636
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$6,673,636
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$3,500,000
% change from forecast90.7%
Reason for change in estimated budget

The IDFG and SBT FY00 project proposal was ranked by CBFWA and approved by NWPPC as a Tier 1 project but received only 26% of the requested funding due to a lack of Wildlife Program funding. As a result of the 74% budget shortfall in FY00, the IDFG and SBT missed several opportunities to meet objectives (i.e., acquire fee-titles and easements). For FY01, we have kept the forecasted total from FY00 ($3.5 million) and added the difference ($3,180,546) between the FY00 approved total ($4,334,510) and the amount received ($1,153,964).

Reason for change in scope

There was no change in the scope.

Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment:

Wildlife acquisitions
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
capital
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$4,300,000 $4,300,000 $4,300,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website