FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199601700
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Provide Technical Support to BPA and Regional Analytical Forums |
Proposal ID | 199601700 |
Organization | BioAnalysts, Inc. |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Dr. Albert Giorgi |
Mailing address | 7981 168 Ave NE Redmond, WA 98052 |
Phone / email | 4258838295 / aegiorgi@nwlink.com |
Manager authorizing this project | Jim Geiselman (BPA) |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Provide analytical support for evaluating fisheries plans and recovery and mitigation efforts as required of BPA and other federal agencies for compliance under ESA, NEPA, and the Northwest Power Act. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
2000 | Participated as an analyst and author in the PATH forum |
1999 | Participated as an analyst and author in the PATH forum |
1998 | Participated as an analyst and author in the PATH forum |
1997 | Participated as an analyst and author in the PATH forum |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Provide quantitative analyses of management alternatives for Columbia Basin anadromous and resident fish species. | $0 | |||
2. Identify and evaluate key scientific hypotheses. | $0 | |||
3. Document critical uncertainties and recommend research to resolve such. | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Provide quantitative analyses of management alternatives for Columbia Basin anadromous and resident fish species. | a. Provide data support for the development of biological models. b. Assess the efficacy of All-H alternatives. c. Develop performance standards. d. Participate in regional analytical forums. | The tasks would be conducted on an ongoing basis as requested by the sponsoring agency (BPA) | $55,000 | |
2. Identify and evaluate key scientific hypotheses. | a. Evaluate current research results. b. Assemble weight of evidence from the scientific literature. | same | $27,500 | |
3. Document critical uncertainties and identify and describe research to resolve such. | a. Identify information gaps. b. Develop experimental management actions to resolve uncertainties. | same | $27,500 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2005 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|---|---|---|
$110,000 | $110,000 | $110,000 | $110,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: Approximately 0.5, as averaged over the staff projected to work on the project. | $59,200 |
Travel | $7,113 | |
Indirect | total includes all OH with fringe benefits (57%), FICA, B&O tax | $43,687 |
$110,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $110,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $110,000 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $110,000 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Ongoing Funding: no; New Funding: no
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
There is no change in scope of work or budget.The NWPPC has decided to stop funding PATH related projects. This is a PATH project and should not be funded to remain consistent with the Council recommendation for tribal, state and federal agency participation in PATH.
This project fails to inform critical management decisions. The project should include such services as a part of other projects tied to specific tasks or products. This project should not be funded as part of the Fish and Wildlife Program since it is not subject to the same standards of the regional review process.
BPA Funding Recommendation
Combine into Technical Support Program
Sep 8, 2000
Comment:
BPA proposes combining many of the tasks associated with these projects into what is now referred to as the Technical Support Project. Funding for specific tasks would not be associated with a specific project in the Council's Direct Program. The Technical Support Project would provide analytical capabilities and analyses needed for fish mitigation and fish impact assessments required of BPA and other federal agencies for compliance with ESA, NEPA, the NW Power Act, and the Clean Water Act. It provides critical analyses needed for management decisions on both a real-time and planning horizon basis and an assessment of the implications of those decisions. Much of this work is currently both direct and indirect support for ESA Biological Assessments and Biological Opinion (BO) consultations, and compliance with multiple analytical, research, and monitoring RPAs of the BO. Parallel analytical work is performed to support our oversight, coordination, and implementation responsibilities for the regional Fish and Wildlife Program. Following is a list of Technical Support Project tasks that BPA believes may be required during FY01 and estimated costs.
Task | ESTIMATED FY01 COST |
---|---|
Participation, critical review, and coordination with NMFS CRI analyses |
$100,000 |
Participation, critical review and coordination with NPPC EDT analyses |
$50,000 |
Juvenile and adult fish passage modeling development, application, and data support |
$70,000 |
Conservation biology /extinction risk applications for recovery plans |
$50,000 |
Hydro measures assessments |
$50,000 |
Habitat measures and watershed assessments |
$150,000 |
Hatchery and harvest measures assessments |
$50,000 |
One-year and five-year Action Plan development and review |
$100,000 |
Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Plan development/evaluation |
$100,000 |
Management framework and performance measures development and application |
$50,000 |
BiOp consultation and review |
$50,000 |
Record of Decision development and review |
$50,000 |
Regional scientific forums/workgroups participation and coordination |
$50,000 |
Life-cycle modeling |
$50,000 |
Program integration and assessment of progress toward meeting mitigation and recovery goals |
$50,000 |
TOTAL | $1,200,000 |
Comment:
Bonneville will fund any future contracts from technical support placeholder