FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199606700

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Manchester Spring Chinook Broodstock Project
Proposal ID	199606700
Organization	National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Tom Flagg
Mailing address	PO Box 130 Manchester, WA 98353
Phone / email	2068427181 / tom.flagg@noaa.gov
Manager authorizing this project	Dr. Robert Iwamoto
Review cycle	FY 2001 Ongoing
Province / Subbasin	Systemwide / Systemwide
Short description	Rear Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon captive broodstocks from Idaho’s Salmon River sub-basin and Oregon’s Grande Ronde River sub-basin. Provide pre-spawning adults, eyed eggs, and juveniles to aid recovery of these ESA-listed stocks.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment
1996	Initiate broodstock rearing; mature 29 precocial age fish
1997	Mature 14 precocial and 83 jack age fish
1998	Mature 10 precocial, 84 jack, and 229 adult age fish
1999	Mature 64 precocial, 131 jack, and 79 adult age fish

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor
Endangered Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon captive broodstock rearing	Rear Salmon River Idaho stocks	2005 and beyond	$285,000
Endangered Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon captive broodstock rearing	Rear Grande Ronde River Oregon stocks	2005 and beyond	$285,000

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

FY 2003	FY 2005	FY 2004	FY 2002
$628,400	$692,800	$659,800	$598,500

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2001 cost
Personnel	FTE: 2.2	$118,000
Fringe		$48,600
Supplies		$270,500
Travel		$5,800
Indirect		$87,100
Subcontractor		$40,000
		$570,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 cost	$570,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2001 budget request	$570,000
FY 2001 forecast from 2000	$525,000
% change from forecast	8.6%

Reason for change in estimated budget

1) Inflation adjustments were not made in the FY2000 forecast, 2) cost of facility maintenance is anticipated to increase.

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no

Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:

Budget has been adjusted due to inflation and cost of facility maintenance increases. There is no change in scope of work.

REVIEW:
NWPPC Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment:

Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review.

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review

Funding category:
expense

Date:
May 2005

FY05 NPCC start of year:	FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:	FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$792,000	$767,200	$767,200

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website