Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Monitor Listed Stock Chinook Salmon Escapement |
| Proposal ID | 199703000 |
| Organization | Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resource Management (NPT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Dave Faurot |
| Mailing address | P O Box 1942 McCall, ID 83638 |
| Phone / email | 2086345290 / davef@nezperce.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | Silas Whitman |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Salmon |
| Short description | Using facilities with underwater time-lapse video technology, to determine adult salmon escapement and abundance and run timing and to compare escapement to redd count survey data on unsupplemented spring and summer chinook salmon spawning aggregates. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
| 1997 |
Pilot year. Temporary, passive fish counting structure was installed on private property on the Secesh River. |
| 1997 |
Video equipment was installed and operated. Video coverage was not sufficient to determine abundance and run timing. |
| 1997 |
M & E Plan was implemented. Fish movement was not impeded nor was spawning displaced downstream |
| 1998 |
Fish counting stations were installed and operated on USFS lands on Lake Creek and the Secesh River. |
| 1998 |
Abundance and run timing were determined on Lake Creek and were estimated on the Secesh River. |
| 1998 |
Fish/redd was calculated for Lake Creek and Secesh River spawning areas. |
| 1998 |
M & E Plan was implemented. Fish movement was not impeded nor was spawning displaced downstream |
| 1999 |
Abundance and run timing were determined on Lake Creek and were estimated on the Secesh River. |
| 1999 |
Fish/redd was calculated for Lake Creek and Secesh River spawning areas. |
| 1999 |
M & E Plan was implemented. Fish movement was not impeded nor was spawning displaced downstream |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 1. Coordination with other agencies. |
a. meet with interested parties |
5 |
$5,000 |
|
| 2. Meet NMFS ESA requirements |
a. provide annual reports related to ESA |
5 |
$5,000 |
|
| 3. Monitor timing and abundance |
a. install, modify and maintain structures |
5 |
$10,000 |
Yes |
|
b. monitor escapement |
5 |
$80,000 |
|
|
c. read tapes, analyze data |
5 |
$30,000 |
|
|
d. conduct monitoring and evaluation |
5 |
$20,000 |
|
| 4. Transfer of technology |
a. prepare and provide annual reports |
5 |
$20,000 |
|
|
b. expand the use of monitoring methods |
5 |
$20,000 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2003 | FY 2005 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|
| $210,000 | $230,000 | $220,000 | $200,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
FTE: 2 |
$95,000 |
| Fringe |
25% |
$25,000 |
| Supplies |
|
$10,000 |
| Travel |
|
$5,000 |
| Indirect |
26.6% |
$40,000 |
| Capital |
|
$10,000 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$5,000 |
| $190,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $190,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $190,000 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $160,000 |
| % change from forecast | 18.8% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Indirect rate increased about 4% in 2001. Additional support staff, monitoring and evaluation costs and inflation will all increase the FY2001 budget requirement. No budget increase occurred for this project from 1999 to 2000.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
The budget has been adjusted due to a change in the indirect cost rate.Additional support staff, monitoring and evaluation costs, and inflation will all increase the FY2001 budget requirement. No budget increase occurred for this project from 1999 to 2000.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
Comment:
Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $401,789 |
$401,789 |
$401,789 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website