FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199801700

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Eliminate Gravel Push-up Dams in Lower North Fork John Day
Proposal ID	199801700
Organization	North Fork John Day Watershed Council (NFJDWC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Robert Stubblefield
Mailing address	P.O. Box 95 Monument, OR 97864
Phone / email	5419342141 / waterguy@transport.com
Manager authorizing this project	Jack Cavender, Chairman, Monument SWCD
Review cycle	FY 2001 Ongoing
Province / Subbasin	Columbia Plateau / John Day
Short description	Eliminate gravel push-up dams in the lower North Fork John Day River. Replace with permanent pumping stations resulting in removal of passage impediments and elimination of annual instream modification.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment
1998	Replaced gravel push-up dams at River Meadows Ranch and Schultz Ranches with permanent pumping stations.
1998	Monitored water temperatures and overall water quality throughout summer season.
1998	Initiated and proposed projects to replace five additional push-up dams.
1999	Completed design for installations to replace three push-up dams with permanent pumping stations.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor
1. NEPA Review	a. Complete NEPA checklist	1	$2,000
2. NMFS Consultation	b. Complete Section 7 Consultation	1	$2,000
3. Design Projects	a. Engineer Project Designs	1	$7,600	Yes

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

FY 2002
$12,000

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor
1. Power Installation	a. Relocate powerlines to location of permanent pumping installations.	1	$18,000	Yes
2. Install permanent pumping stations	a. Purchase materials for installations.	1	$50,500
	b. Install materials.	1	$20,000	Yes

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

FY 2002
$90,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor
1. Clean permanent pumping stations.	a. Annually pump accumulated silt from systems.	1	$2,000

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

FY 2005	FY 2003	FY 2004	FY 2002
$1,000	$1,000	$1,000	$1,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor
1. Monitor water quality.	a. Install temperature monitors at each project site.	1	$500
	b. Compute and store data.	1	$1,000

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

FY 2005	FY 2003	FY 2004	FY 2002
$1,500	$1,500	$1,500	$1,500

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2001 cost
Personnel	FTE: .1	$3,000
Travel		$500
Indirect		$1,100
Subcontractor		$7,000
Supplies		$47,000
Travel		$1,000
Indirect		$4,500
Subcontractor		$36,000
Supplies		$2,000
Personnel	FTE: .05	$1,500
		$103,600

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 cost	$103,600
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2001 budget request	$103,600
FY 2001 forecast from 2000	$90,250
% change from forecast	14.8%

Reason for change in estimated budget

Cost of installation materials (PVC pipe) have risen dramatically due to higher oil prices.

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no

Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:

The budget has increased due to a dramatic rise in the cost of installation materials (PVC pipe) because of higher oil prices. There is no change in the scope of work.

REVIEW:
NWPPC Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment:

Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review. Project has not used $90,250 budgeted for 2000. Check availability of carry-forward.

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review

Funding category:
expense

Date:
May 2005

FY05 NPCC start of year:	FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:	FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$105,134	$105,134	$105,134

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website