FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199803300
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Restore Upper Toppenish Creek Watershed |
| Proposal ID | 199803300 |
| Organization | Yakama Nation (YN) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Lynn Hatcher, Fisheries Program Manager |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA. 98948 |
| Phone / email | 5098656262 / lynn@yakama.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Yakima |
| Short description | Moderate flow regime in Toppenish Creek by increasing the retentiveness of natural soil water storage areas, such as headwater meadows and floodplains, following prioritized plan generated by FY98-99 hydrologic assessment. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 2000 | Hydrologic Assessment completed |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilize headcuts | A) Using machinery and hand labor, lay headcuts back and stabilize with combinations of vegetation, rock, geotextiles, etc. | 2 | $20,000 | |
| Retain sediment in degrading channels | A) Using combinations of machinery and hand labor, install appropriate sediment retention structures in ephemeral and intermittent channels | 2 | $15,000 | |
| Stabilize sediment deposits | A) Revegetate fresh sediment deposits with appropriate local vegetation | 2 | $25,000 | |
| Enhance channel/floodplain interaction | A) Remove or set back streamside dikes. B) Use salvaged rock from dikes and other appropriate material to increase overbank flow and/or roughness in degraded alluvial stream reaches | 2 | $30,000 | |
| Stabilize eroding uplands | A) Revegetate sensitive upland areas which are subject to excessive erosion. B) Repair, replace, and relocate fences, develop livestock management capabilities. C) Develop off channel stock water sites. | 2 | $30,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
| FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|
| $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintain headcut stabilization efforts | Routinely visit and monitor headcut stabilization sites - make necessary adjustments and repair failures | 4 | $5,000 | |
| Maintain sediment retention facilities in degrading channels | Routinely visit and maintain sediment retention structures - upgrade as needed | 4 | $5,000 | |
| Maintain sediment stabilization efforts | Maintain annually, revegetation and soil stabilization sites - repair or augment as needed | 4 | $5,000 | |
| Maintain channel/floodplain enhancements | Maintain channel/floodplain enhancement efforts - repair and augment as needed. | 4 | $5,000 | |
| Stabilize eroding uplands | A) Maintain erosion control efforts annually - redo treatments as necessary B) Frequently visit livestock water and handling facilities - repair and upgrade as needed. | 4 | $20,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitor and evaluate all projects at least annually, or more frequently if necessary | A) Monitor and evaluate all project sites on an annual basis or appropriate interval depending on treatment. B) Make modifications deemed necessary in the evaluation task above | 4 | $30,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 1 - professional and technicians combined | $26,857 |
| Fringe | @ 25.3% | $6,795 |
| Supplies | equipment rental, erosion control materials, etc. | $57,514 |
| Indirect | @ 23.5% | $28,834 |
| Personnel | FTE: .5 - professional and technicians combined | $13,429 |
| Fringe | @25.3% | $3,398 |
| Supplies | equipment rental, revegetation materials, other field supplies | $15,562 |
| Indirect | @23.5% | $7,611 |
| Personnel | FTE: .5 - professional and technicians combined | $13,429 |
| Fringe | @25.3% | $3,398 |
| Supplies | general monitoring supplies, instrument upgrade and repair, etc. | $7,464 |
| Indirect | @23.5% | $5,709 |
| $190,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $190,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $190,000 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $350,000 |
| % change from forecast | -45.7% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Hydrologic assessment indicates lower funding levels than previously anticipated.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
Hydrologic assessment indicates funding levels lower than previously anticipated. There is no change in the scope of work.Comment:
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
expense
Date:
May 2005
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $415,046 | $415,046 | $415,046 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website