Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Mitigate Effects Of Runoff & Erosion On Salmonid Habitat In Pine Hollow and Jackknife |
| Proposal ID | 199901000 |
| Organization | Pine Hollow/Jackknife Watershed Council, c/o Sherman Soil and Water Conservation District (Sherman SWCD) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Jeff Clark |
| Mailing address | PO Box 405 Moro, OR 97039 |
| Phone / email | 5415653216 / scswcd@transport.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Jeff Clark |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / John Day |
| Short description | Implement practices to reduce erosion and flooding, allowing natural recovery of riparian vegetation and channel type in Pine Hollow and Jackknife Canyons. Future phases will focus on replanting or protecting critical areas in the stream corridor. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
| 1995 |
Begin temperature monitoring in Pine Hollow |
| 1996 |
Begin steelhead spawning surveys in Pine Hollow |
| 1997 |
Demonstration Phase implementation in Pine Hollow |
| 1998 |
Begin upland practices in Pine Hollow |
| 1998 |
Assess stream condition using PFC in Pine Hollow |
| 1999 |
Jackknife Canyon and lands along John Day added to scope of project |
| 1999 |
Completion of Decker Ranch Grazing Management Plan |
| 1999 |
Begin upland assessment of Jackknife Canyon |
| 1999 |
First CREP contract signed in Pine Hollow - protects and replants 13+ stream miles |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 1. Assess Condition |
a- Jackknife Canyon grazing lands assessments |
3 |
$2,700 |
Yes |
|
b- Riparian/Channel assessments, projected to be completed |
2 |
$0 |
|
| 2. Mitigate Peak Flow Events |
a- Develop Range Management Plans |
6 |
$3,000 |
Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
| FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|
| $1,500 | $1,500 | $5,000 |
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 2. Mitigate Peak Flow Events - see also objectives 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
b- Install cross-fencing for better livestock distribution/utilization |
5 |
$8,097 |
|
|
c- Install spring developments for better livestock distribution/utilization |
5 |
$9,097 |
|
|
d- Reseed critical areas - areas in poor/fair condition |
|
$6,598 |
|
|
e- Install field terracing and water and sediment control basins for control of runoff/erosion from grain fields |
|
$8,598 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
| FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|
| $16,000 | $22,000 | $16,000 | $22,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 7. Monitor |
a- Track steelhead spawning activity through redd counts - ONGOING |
10 |
$360 |
|
|
b- Photopoints at all project sites, and photo monitoring of range condition at individual ranches. |
12 |
$840 |
|
|
c- Monitor temperature throughout summer |
12 |
$965 |
|
|
d- Reevaluate stream condition after five years using Proper Functioning Condition |
12 |
$0 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|
| $2,600 | $2,500 | $2,265 | $2,165 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
FTE: administration of subcontractor payments |
$600 |
| Fringe |
|
$150 |
| Subcontractor |
Pine Hollow/Jackknife Range Planner |
$4,950 |
| Personnel |
FTE: 2 people, ~.38 FTE, BPA share 50% |
$5,000 |
| Fringe |
|
$1,250 |
| NEPA |
consultation with FWS, cultural resource survey |
$140 |
| Other |
Cost-share to landowner @ 45%BPA |
$26,000 |
| Personnel |
|
$288 |
| Fringe |
|
$72 |
| Supplies |
|
$125 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$1,680 |
| $40,255 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $40,255 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $13,157 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $27,098 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $30,000 |
| % change from forecast | -9.7% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Jackknife Canyon and John Day River lands have been added to the scope of the Watershed Council. The geographic area serviced through this watershed council has approximately doubled. The land uses and issues are nearly identical. The contracted range planner is currently conducting rangeland condition assessments on uplands in Jackknife Canyon and associated lands along the John Day River. By 2001, grazing management plans will be in preliminary stages, and high priority projects will be identified. The budgets for planning, implementation and monitoring are increased slightly due to this change in geographic scope. On the other hand, funds from FY1999 were carried over into FY2000. Most of this carryover is expected to linger into FY2001.
Reason for change in scope
Jackknife Canyon and John Day River lands have been added to the scope of the Watershed Council. The Geographic area serviced through this watershed council has approximately doubled. The land uses and issues are nearly identical. The contracted range planner is currently conducting rangeland condition assessments on uplands in Jackknife Canyon and associated lands along the John Day River. By 2001, grazing management plans will be in preliminary stages, and high priority projects will be identified. The budgets for planning, implementation and monitoring are increased slightly due to this change in geographic scope.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
Jackknife Canyon and John Day River lands have been added to the scope of the Watershed Council. The geographic area serviced through this watershed council has approximately doubled. The land uses and issues are nearly identical. The contracted range planner is currently conducting range land condition assessments on uplands in Jackknife Canyon and associated lands along the John Day River. By 2001, grazing management plans will be in preliminary stages, and high priority projects will be identified. The budgets for planning, implementation, and monitoring are increased slightly due to this change in geographic scope. On the other hand, funds from FY1999 were carried over into FY 2000. Most of this carryover is expected to linger into FY2001.Proposed $13,157 in carry forward from FY 2000.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
Comment:
Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review. Project does not have carry-forward assumed by sponsor.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $23,500 |
$23,500 |
$23,500 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website