FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199902000
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Analyze the Persistence and Spatial Dynamics of Snake River Chinook Salmon |
Proposal ID | 199902000 |
Organization | USDA Forest Service- Rocky Mountain Research Station (USFS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Russ Thurow |
Mailing address | 316 East Myrtle Boise, ID 83702 |
Phone / email | 2083734377 / rthurow@fs.fed.us |
Manager authorizing this project | Allyn Meuleman |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Salmon |
Short description | Results will advance current understanding of the relationship between landscape characteristics and the distribution, pattern, and persistence of chinook salmon. Such information could be key to development of conservation and restoration strategies. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1995 | Drainage-wide redd count. Began aerial mapping of potential spawning areas (patches). |
1996 | Drainage-wide redd count. Aerial and ground mapping of spawning patches. Measures of patch quality. |
1997 | Drainage-wide redd count. Aerial and ground mapping of spawning patches. Measures of patch quality. |
1998 | Drainage-wide redd count. Aerial and ground mapping of spawning patches. Measures of patch quality. |
1999 | Drainage-wide redd count. Aerial and ground mapping of spawning patches. Measures of patch quality. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Map the distribution of chinook salmon redds. | a. Count redds annually via aerial and ground-based surveys. | 2004 | $38,064 | |
b. Use GPS to spatially locate redds | $0 | |||
2. Map the distribution of potential spawning patches. | a. Aerially map spawning patches. b. Validate aerial surveys with ground-based surveys. c. Use GPS to spatially locate spawning patches. | 2004 | $38,064 | |
3. Describe patch quality. | a. Measure indices of patch quality. | 2004 | $5,438 | |
4. Relate the location and quality of spawning patches to basin geomorphic features. | a. Compile databases that describe basin landscape features. b. Explore various regression and discriminate function analyses approaches. c. Select the analysis and complete. | 2004 | $10,875 | |
5. Evaluate the influence of patch size, quality, and context on redd distribution. | a. Explore various regression and discriminate function analyses approaches. | 2004 | $16,313 | |
b. Select the analysis and complete.. | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|---|---|
$119,900 | $125,900 | $114,190 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: Temporaries + some permanent salary | $40,424 |
Fringe | 20.55% | $8,310 |
Supplies | $5,000 | |
Travel | $5,880 | |
Indirect | 18% | $16,590 |
Other | Operating Costs, Helicopter rental, etc. | $32,550 |
$108,754 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $108,754 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $108,754 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $105,900 |
% change from forecast | 2.7% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Increase anticipated in Personnel, Operations, and Travel costs.
Reason for change in scope
N/A
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
An increase is anticipated in Personnel, Operations, and Travel costs. There is no change in the scope of work. An increase in the budget is due to cost of living allowances. Last year's budget was reduced due to budget restrictions. All FY 2000 tasks and objectives were supported by the SRT and the ISRP.Comment:
Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review. Project has full balance of $50,000 uncontracted from 2000. Check ability to initiate.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$160,491 | $0 | $0 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website