FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 200003100

Additional documents

TitleType

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleEnhance North Fork John Day River Subbasin Anadromous Fish Habitat
Proposal ID200003100
OrganizationConfederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameR. Todd Shaw
Mailing addressP.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801
Phone / email5412764109 / toddshaw@ctuir.com
Manager authorizing this projectGary James
Review cycleFY 2001 Ongoing
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / John Day
Short descriptionIncrease production of indigenous wild stocks of spring chinook salmon and summer steelhead within the North Fork of the John Day River Subbasin.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
"New Project in 2000 - FY 2000 Funds have not yet been provided"

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Identify habitat impacts, attain solutions to detrimental land use practices and promote support of habitat enhancement measures in the North Fork of the John Day River Subbasin. a. Utilize existing information, including historical documents, research and management plans and any available GIS Data, to determine locations of site-specific habitat impacts. indefinite $7,905
b. Coordinate with landowners and local, tribal, state and federal entities to identify habitat impacts, determine remedial measures and obtain support of project efforts. indefinite $11,945
c. Conduct local outreach efforts (public meetings, tours and presentations) to obtain input, address landowner concerns, provide educational opportunities, and promote stream habitat restoration and protection. indefinite $14,268
d. Assist the North Fork John Day Watershed Council in development of a North Fork John Day Watershed Assessment. three years $10,268 Yes
2. Plan and design habitat enhancement projects. a. Coordinate with local, state and federal resource entities and prepare grant proposals to develop cost-share projects. indefinite $6,065
b. Develop and secure riparian easements with private landowners for proposed habitat enhancements. indefinite $9,323
c. Obtain necessary environmental clearances, including Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act cultural and archeological compliance, Sections 401 and 404 Federal Clean Water Act Permits and Section 7 U.S. Endangered Species Act consultations. indefinite $10,631
d. Complete project design and layout. indefinite $4,484
e. Solicit bids and award subcontracts for fence construction, operated equipment, native tree and shrub plantings and noxious weed control. indefinite $9,871
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2005FY 2003FY 2004FY 2002
$112,000$93,000$102,000$93,000

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
3. Implement passive enhancements in combination with intensive, native revegetation efforts. a. Construct livestock exclusion fencing around project areas indefinite $59,460 Yes
b. Install native willow cuttings and various bareroot tree and shrub species with an excavator along stream channel margins. indefinite $23,667 Yes
c. Seed native grasses and hand plant indigenous trees and shrubs in project areas to stabilize streambanks, reduce sediment input, provide insect drop, shade stream channels, cool stream temperatures and increase in-stream wood recruitment. indefinite $28,368
d. Treat noxious weeds in project areas. duration of riparian easements $3,500 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2005FY 2003FY 2004FY 2002
$151,000$134,500$142,500$126,500

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
4. Maintain habitat enhancements within project areas. a. Maintain livestock exclusion fencing. duration of riparian easement $8,092
. b. Care of trees and shrubs, including watering, tree mat placement and tree shelter installation. approximately five years per individual project $8,480
c. Treat noxious weeds in existing project areas. duration of riparian easement $3,000 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2005FY 2003FY 2004FY 2002
$25,500$22,500$24,000$21,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
5. Collect baseline data and conduct post-project monitoring to identify habitat limiting factors and to quantify effects of habitat enhancement measures. a. Conduct habitat surveys in proposed habitat enhancement project areas to obtain baseline physical data. life of project $7,018
b. Conduct biological inventories to determine pre and post-project anadromous fish presence. life of project $4,578
c. Measure changes in channel morphology and vegetative responses to habitat enhancements at new and established photo point and stream channel transect sites. life of project $4,578
d. Collect stream temperatures during summer months to monitor the effectiveness of habitat enhancements on water temperature cooling. life of project $699
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2005FY 2003FY 2004FY 2002
$22,500$20,000$21,000$19,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: 9.75 months (Biologist, Technician, GIS Analyst, Cultural Technician, Office Manager and Secretary $37,323
Fringe 30% $11,197
Supplies phone services, office supplies, duplication/printing, educational materials $4,000
Travel GSA vehicle lease, vehicle mileage, vehicle insurance $3,271
Indirect 34% of personnel & fringe, supplies and travel $18,969
NEPA included in Personnel above $0
Subcontractor Watershed Assessment $10,000
Personnel FTE: fish habitat technician, 2 months $4,630
Fringe 30% $1,389
Supplies fence materials, native trees/shrubs, native grass seed, and field materials $38,000
Travel GSA vehicle lease, vehicle mileage, vehicle insurance, training and per diem $4,485
Indirect 34% of personnel, fringe benefits, construction materials and field materials $16,491
Subcontractor fence construction, operated heavy equipment and noxious weed control $50,000
Personnel FTE: 1.5 months fisheries technician; 0.5 fish biologist $3,964
Fringe 30% $1,189
Supplies tools, fence materials, tree mats and tree shelters $6,000
Travel GSA vehicle lease, vehicle mileage and vehicle insurance $1,214
Indirect 34% of personnel, fringe benefits, supplies & materials and travel $4,205
Subcontractor noxious weed control $3,000
Personnel FTE: fish technician (2 months) and fish biologist (1.75 months) $8,752
Fringe 30% $2,626
Travel GSA vehicle lease, vehicle mileage and vehicle insurance $1,214
Indirect 34% of personnel, fringe benefits and travel $4,281
$236,200
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$236,200
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$236,200
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$210,000
% change from forecast12.5%
Reason for change in estimated budget

Budget is slightly higher than anticipated because of additional funds required for: (1) biologist to develop biological assessments for proposed noxious weed treatments and installation of live plant materials with 404 fill and removal permits (compliance with ESA Section 7 Consultation and NMFS 4d rules), (2) additional O&M ( includes increased technician hours for fence and plant maintenance due to project biologist having less field time than anticipated because of time required to develop biological assessments), and (3) trenching in willows with a subcontracted operated excavator.

Reason for change in scope

Scope has changed slightly to include modified O&M costs. This was a new project in FY 2000 and no O&M was required. Enhancements implemented during FY 2000 will require O&M during FY 2001. Enhancements involving operated heavy equipment and 404 fill and removals permits were not initially proposed. However, project personnel have determined that trenching in live plant materials with an excavator is the most cost-effective and most successful means of establishing riparian vegetation in project areas. CTUIR has had considerable success establishing native willow communities utilizing this planting technique in neighboring, Umatilla and Walla Walla River Basins.

Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:

The budget is slightly higher than anticipated because of additional funds required for:
  1. the biologist to develop biological assessments for proposed noxious weed treatments and installation of live plant materials with 404 fill and removal permits (compliance with ESA Section 7 Consultation and NMFS 4d rules),
  2. additional O&M (includes increased technician hours for fence and plant maintenance due to project biologist having less field time than anticipated because of time required to develop biological assessments), and
  3. trenching in willows with a subcontracted operated excavator.

The scope has changed slightly to include modified O&M costs. This was a new project in FY 2000 and no O&M was required. Enhancements implemented during FY 2000 will require O&M during FY 2001. Enhancements involving operated heavy equipment and 404 fill and removals permits were not initially proposed; however, project personnel have determined that trenching in live plant materials with an excavator is the most cost-effective and most successful means of establishing riparian vegetation in project areas. CTUIR has had considerable success establishing native willow communities utilizing this planting technique in neighboring Umatilla and Walla Walla River Basins.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment:

Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$244,544 $244,544 $244,544

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website