Return to Proposal Finder FY 2003 Columbia Estuary Proposal 30017

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Columbia River Tidewater assessment for Recovery Planning
BPA Project Proposal Number 30017
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
University of Portland
Business acronym (if appropriate) UP
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Thomas W. H. Backman
Mailing Address 19948 South Leland Road
City, State, Zip Oregon City, OR 97045
Phone 5036579005
Fax 5036571951
E-mail TWHB@aol.com
 
Manager of program authorizing this project Dr. Steven A. Kolmes
 
Review Cycle Columbia Estuary
Province Columbia Estuary
Subbasin Columbia Estuary
 
Short Description Characterize habitat/fish productivity relationships; identify factors that limit recovery, early actions for recovery; and research, monitoring, and evaluation needs
Target Species Lower Columbia Steelhead, Lower Columbia Chum, Lower Columbia Chinook, Upper Willamette Steelhead, and Upper Willamette Chinook


Project Location

Latitude Longitude Description
Covers the mainstem Columbia and Willamette River to Willlamette Falls of the Lower Columbia and Willamette ESU's
Columbia River Estuary


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

RPA
Action 1058
Action 158
Action 159
Action 160
Action 161
Action 162

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

This information comes from National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) reviews of this project proposal. The following table represents BPA & NMFS determinations as to this proposal's relevance to particular Biological Opinion Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs).

Reviewing Agency Action Number BiOp Agency Description
NMFS Action 159 NMFS BPA and the Corps, working with LCREP and NMFS, shall develop a plan addressing the habitat needs of salmon and steelhead in the estuary.


Information Transfer

The expected outcomes of this project are:
Qualitative

Data generated by this project are:
Primary
Derived

Are there restrictions on the use of this data?
None

Where do the data reside?
Private/Managed Locally:

Printed
Electronic

Public Access:
Printed at BPA
Peer-reviewed Journal
Internet at BPA


In what other ways will information from this project be transferred or used?

The information is a critical piece of information required by the Willamette-Lower Columbia and Interior Columbia-Snake Technical Recovery Teams to guide recovery plan development.


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: Entered database late due to transmittal problems, and then budget problems. ANL 1/22/02; Not listed on Proposal Presentation or CBFWA Review Agendas, but was reviewed. Conversation with T. Iverson, 6/28/02. ANL
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
2000 Willamette-Lower Columbia Technical Recovery Team formed
2001 WLC-TRT and NMFS identify this as a high priority need


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2003 cost Subcontractor
1. Collect, analyze and synthesize existing available data a. Describe historical condition 1 $ 55,792  
1. b. Channel habitat typing 1 $ 0  
1. c. Characterize tidal-fluvial conditions 1 $ 0  
2. Determine salmon-life-stage dependence on habitat types. a. Describe the relationship of various habitat types to salmon needs. 1 $ 31,429  
3. Develop habitat perfomance standard to guide recovery planning and delisting criteria. a. Describe the ecological processes and functions that result in supportive habitat 1 $ 32,251  
3. b. Propose guidelines for recovery planning and delisting guidelines. 1 $ 0  
4. Describe Research, Monitoring and Evaluation needs. a. Describe critical uncertainties. 1 $ 17,866  
4. b. Propose R, M and E guidelines to reduce critical uncertainties. 1 $ 0  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

n/a or no information


Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

n/a or no information


Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

n/a or no information


Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

n/a or no information


Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2003 Cost
Personnel $ 86,870
Fringe $ 34,748
Supplies $ 3,025
Travel $ 1,550
Indirect $ 11,145
Total Itemized Budget $137,338


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2003 project cost $137,338
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2003 budget request $137,338
FY 2003 forecast from 2002 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

Not applicable  

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page