Return to Proposal Finder FY 2003 Lower Columbia Proposal 31019

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Fish Passage Assessment and Prioritization Program
BPA Project Proposal Number 31019
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, Operations Division
Business acronym (if appropriate) WA County, OR DLUT
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Janet Oatney
Mailing Address 1400 SW Walnut St., MS 51
City, State, Zip Hillsboro, Oregon 97123
Phone 5038467652
Fax 5038467620
E-mail janet_oatney@co.washington.or.us
 
Manager of program authorizing this project Gregory S. Miller, P.E., Operations Manager
 
Review Cycle Lower Columbia
Province Lower Columbia
Subbasin Willamette
 
Short Description Develop fish passage barrier assessment methodology for road / stream crossings, inventory and assess county owned facilities on a 5th field HUC basis, prioritize passage barriers to core habitat areas for threatened and endangered fish species.
Target Species Winter Steelhead, cutthroat trout, all resident and anadromous fish species


Project Location

Latitude Longitude Description
Tualatin River Watershed
Small Portion of Nehalam River Watershed


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

RPA
Action 150
Action 152
Action 154

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


Information Transfer

The expected outcomes of this project are:
Qualitative

Data generated by this project are:
Primary

Are there restrictions on the use of this data?
None

Where do the data reside?
Private/Managed Locally:

Printed
Electronic

Public Access:
Other Printed: Washington County
Internet at Streamnet
Internet at Fish Passage Center (FPC)


In what other ways will information from this project be transferred or used?

Will be forwarded to Clean Water Services for inclusion in the Watersheds 2000 database, available for inclusion in future watershed assessments by local councils & organizations.


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
not applicable


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

Project ID Title Description
20088 Assess McKenzie Watershed Habitat & Prioritize Projects supporting
200001600 Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge Additions complimentary
199206800 Willamette Basin Mitigation Program complimentary
198403600 Willamette River Projects Wildlife and Habitat Loss Assessment complimentary


Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2003 cost Subcontractor
1. Finalize Barrier Assessment Methodology a. Incorporate USFS "Measurements of Surrogates" techniques for fish passage assessment .1 $ 4,551  
b. Develop inspection protocol .05 $ 2,275  
c. initiate recruitment process .2 (concurent w/ objective 1.) $ 0  
2. Develop Prioritization Plan a. Incorporate & modify Clackamas County's "Guide to Prioritizing Fish Passage Barriers" .05 $ 2,275  
3. Incorporate Existing Environmental data a. Access urban water / habitat quality information from Clean Water Services .1 $ 4,551  
b. Obtain electronic dataset of ODF&Ws limited fish passage assesment within Washington County. .025 $ 1,136  
c. Ensure spatial integration of data obtained by outside sources. .1 $ 4,550  
d. Utilize Multnomah County's existing GIS and IRIS (Common Public Works Database) links to ensure data compatiblity .1 $ 4,550  
4. Obtain 5 year work program for Washington County Operations and Major Streets Improvements Programs .01 $ 0  
5. Develop Comprehensive Plan for incorporating barrier assessments, structural condition, environmental quality, & gained habitat opportunity information into one data set that can be linked through the County's existing database .2 $ 4,551  
6. NEPA **Applicants Note: phone conversation with Nancy Weintraub, BPA, indicates that minimal NEPA review will be required; categorical exclusion will be the likely finding. Ms. Weintraub recommends a budgetary line item of $0.00.** $ 0  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

Objective Starting FY Ending FY Estimated cost
no planning and design out year objectives $ 0


Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

n/a or no information


Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2003 cost Subcontractor
1. Conduct Dairy - McKay 5th Field barrier assessment & inventory a. Train Staff .05 $ 2,276  
b. Conduct assessments .5 $ 33,467  
c. Incorporate data into database ongoing $ 0  
d. Develop ranked triage lists of road - stream crossings that block fish passage .1 $ 5,625  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

Objective Starting FY Ending FY Estimated cost
1. Conduct Gales Creek Assessment 2004 2004 $ 13,125
2. Conduct Upper Tualatin - Scoggins Assessment 2004 2005 $ 13,125
3. Conduct Middle Tualatin - Rock Creek Assessment 2005 2005 $ 13,125
4. Conduct Lower Tualatin Assessment 2005 2006 $ 13,125
5. Produce electronic and hard copy final assessment report 2006 2006 $ 8,325
6. Produce Washington County prioritization plan for removing barriers that block passage to fish species 2006 2007 $ 2,250


Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
$ 13,125 $ 26,250 $ 20,625 $ 2,250


Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2003 cost Subcontractor
1. Incorporate new environmental data as it becomes available ongoing $ 750  
2. Maintain data integrity ongoing $ 750  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

Objective Starting FY Ending FY Estimated cost
1. Incorporate new environmental data as it becomes available 2004 2007 $ 2,250
2. Maintain data integrity 2004 2007 $ 2,250


Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
$ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 750 $ 750


Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2003 cost Subcontractor
1. Program Evaluation .025 $ 1,125  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

Objective Starting FY Ending FY Estimated cost
1. Yearly Program Evaluation 2004 2007 $ 4,500


Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
$ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 750 $ 750


Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2003 Cost
Personnel $ 52,819
Fringe $ 16,715
Supplies $ 2,073
Travel $ 0
Indirect $ 0
Capital $ 0
NEPA $ 0
PIT tags $ 0
Subcontractor $ 0
Other printing / distribution $ 825
Total Itemized Budget $ 72,432


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2003 project cost $ 72,432
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2003 budget request $ 72,432
FY 2003 forecast from 2002 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Organization Item or service provided Amount Cash or In-Kind
Multnomah County Database & GIS technical assistance $ 2,500 in-kind
Clackamas County Prioritization Software (in house design) $ 5,000 in-kind
Washington County Staff, equipment, benefits, office, supplies $ 28,665 in-kind
US Forest Service Assessment Methodology $ 5,000 in-kind

 

Outyear Budget Totals

2004 2005 2006 2007
Construction/implementation $ 13,125 $ 26,250 $ 20,625 $ 2,250
Operations and maintenance $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 750 $ 750
Monitoring and evaluation $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 750 $ 750
Total Outyear Budgets $ 16,125 $ 29,250 $ 22,125 $ 3,750
 

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page