Return to Proposal Finder FY 1999 Proposal 9025

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Prevent Mortality in Methow Endangered and Proposed Fish
BPA Project Proposal Number 9025
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
USDA Forest Service, Okanogan National Forest, Methow Valley Ranger District
Business acronym (if appropriate) USFS
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Ardis Bynum
Mailing Address P.O. Box 97
City, State, Zip Winthrop, WA 98862
Phone 5099964004
Fax 5099964051
E-mail fsinfo@methow.com
 
Manager of program authorizing this project
 
Review Cycle FY 1999
Province Upper Mid-Columbia
Subbasin Methow
 
Short Description Replace (lethal) fish screen with adequate, safe screen
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses: Provide Passage and Protective Screens on Tributaries; Bull Trout Mitigation; Implement Resident Fish Policies; Sorry, do not know measure numbers.
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses: The Endangered Species Act prohibits taking of listed species. This project would comply by saving the lives of Upper Columbia summer steelhead and bull trout.
Other Planning Document References


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

n/a or no information


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

Project ID Title Description Umbrella
0 None No


Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. remove Endangered Species Act non-compliant structure a. dismantle, haul away existing structure
2. comply with Endg. Spc. Act b. purchase new screen
. c. install new screen structure

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 06/01/99 07/01/99 16.0%
2 07/01/99 08/01/99 84.0%


Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 1999 Cost
Personnel overseer, and some labor $ 5,500
Supplies fish screen and installation supplies $ 14,000
Subcontractor competitive bid $ 5,500
Total Itemized Budget $ 25,000


Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 project cost $ 25,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 1999 budget request $ 25,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

Not applicable  

Other Budget Explanation

Schedule Constraints: Extreme high water would delay the project start date


Section 6. References

n/a or no information


Section 7. Abstract

Abstract

The screen for the USFS diversion structure on Eightmile Creek, used for irrigation of the Forest Service’s Eightmile Ranch, is inadequate, and anadromous and resident fish --including fish listed and proposed in the Endangered Species Act--are killed as a result. The goal is simple: stop this fish mortality with an adequate screen structure. This could be accomplished in one summer season. The design of such structures is standard and would pose no unusual difficulty, nor would its construction. Monitoring and maintenance of the new screen is the responsibility of the Forest Service, and would be carried out regularly as part of the irrigation of the Eightmile Ranch.


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page