Return to Proposal Finder FY 1999 Proposal 9031

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date

Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Implement Entiat Model Watershed Plan
BPA Project Proposal Number 9031
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Chelan County Conservation District
Business acronym (if appropriate) CCCD

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Peggy Entzel, Office Manager
Mailing Address 301 Yakima St., Rm. 301
City, State, Zip Wenatchee, WA 98801
Phone 5096640265
Fax 5096640255
Manager of program authorizing this project
Review Cycle FY 1999
Province Upper Mid-Columbia
Subbasin Entiat
Short Description Build 60 instream habitat structures and plant 12,177 m of riparian vegetation along private lands of the Entiat River as part of the Model Watershed Plan.
Target Species

Project Location

[No information]

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal

NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses:
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses:
Other Planning Document References

CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous

Section 2. Past Accomplishments

n/a or no information

Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information

Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. Build instream structures a. Procure and state materials
1. Build instream structures b. Install structures
2. Plant riparian vegetation a. Propagate local root stock
2. Plant riparian vegetation b. Plant selected areas
3. Inform and involve public a. Create informational signs
3. Inform and involve public b. Conduct field tours
4. Evaluate project efficacy a. Public acceptance
4. Evaluate project efficacy b. Habitat complexity and use
4. Evaluate project efficacy c. Structure longevity

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 04/01/99 08/01/01 63.0%
2 10/01/98 03/01/01 22.0%
3 06/01/99 09/01/01 10.0%
4 09/01/99 09/01/01 5.0%

Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 1999 Cost
Personnel $ 7,900
Fringe $ 1,185
Supplies $138,000
Travel $ 372
Indirect $ 2,000
Subcontractor $ 50,171
Total Itemized Budget $199,628

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 project cost $199,628
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 1999 budget request $199,628
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%

Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable

Reason for change in scope

Not applicable

Cost Sharing

Not applicable

Outyear Budget Totals

2000 2001
All Phases $210,000 $180,000
Total Outyear Budgets $210,000 $180,000

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable

Section 6. References

n/a or no information

Section 7. Abstract


Landowners and technical staff from co-managing agencies and tribes completed their multiple resource management plan for the Entiat Watershed. This consensus plan is based on the Model Watershed Approach developed in the 1994 Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (Program Measure 7.7B). The plan identifies many actions to benefit wildlife and fish, particularly steelhead, listed as "endangered" and spring chinook salmon, a candidate species, under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). We request BPA funds to do two active restoration projects identified in the Entiat Plan (although several passive restoration projects have been identified and will be done through other means): (1) build 60 instream structures, and (2) plant 12 km of native riparian vegetation. The types and locations of these projects were identified by a multidisciplinary team of specialists from agencies and tribes, and approved by landowners. This project will be done in three years (funding needs are $199,628 in FY99, $210,000 in FY00, and $180,000 in FY01). Short-term success will be evaluated by the acceptance of other landowners to participate in the plan. Long-term success will be measured in (1) stream characteristics (e.g.; pool:riffle and width:depth ratios), (2) microhabitat use of salmon and steelhead, (3) structure longevity, and (4) cost effectiveness compared to other restoration projects in the watershed.

Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page