Return to Proposal Finder FY 1999 Proposal 9076

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Evaluate Return Flow Recovery
BPA Project Proposal Number 9076
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Roza-Sunnyside Board of Joint Control
Business acronym (if appropriate) RSBOJC
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name James W. Trull
Mailing Address P.O. Box 239
City, State, Zip Sunnyside, WA 98944
Phone 5098376980
Fax 5098372088
E-mail
 
Manager of program authorizing this project
 
Review Cycle FY 1999
Province Lower Mid-Columbia
Subbasin Yakima
 
Short Description Evaluate the feasibility of recovering water from the Granger Drain for reuse in the irrigation distribution system.
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses:
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses:
Other Planning Document References


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

n/a or no information


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. Evaluate Feasibility of Drain Water Reuse a. Conduct a feasibility study to evaluate the feasibility of reusing drain water from the Granger Drain for irrigation purposes

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 01/01/98 12/01/99  


Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 1999 Cost
Personnel RSBOJC Staff $ 5,000
Fringe $ 2,500
Indirect Office overhead $ 500
Subcontractor CH2M Hill $ 42,000
Total Itemized Budget $ 50,000


Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 project cost $ 50,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 1999 budget request $ 50,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

Not applicable  

Other Budget Explanation

Schedule Constraints: No constraints have been identified that would affect the schedule.


Section 6. References

n/a or no information


Section 7. Abstract

Abstract

The irrigated lands within the Roza-Sunnyside Board of Joint Control (RSBOJC) service area are drained by a network of major drainage waterways. These waterways represent a potential source of water that could be reused for irrigation. The proposed return flow recovery program would enhance the irrigation water supply for the RSBOJC while reducing the quantity of sediment discharged to the Yakima River. With adequate funding, the feasibility study could be done during 1998 and 1999. If the concept is found to be feasible, the water supply and quality improvements could be implemented as soon as 2000. The success of the program would be measured as part of the RSBOJC water quality monitoring program. The presence of constituents such as turbidity and suspended solids in the water returning to the Yakima River are expected to diminish when the return flow recovery systems are constructed.


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page