Return to Proposal Finder FY 1999 Proposal 9142

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date

Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Produce Watershed Analysis Procedure for Salmon Habitat Restoration
BPA Project Proposal Number 9142
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
Business acronym (if appropriate) CRITFC

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Dale McCullough
Mailing Address 729 NE Oregon St., Suite 200
City, State, Zip Portland, OR 97232
Phone 5032380667
Fax 5032354228
Manager of program authorizing this project
Review Cycle FY 1999
Province Systemwide
Subbasin Systemwide
Short Description Create a standardized design and methodology for watershed analyses specifically oriented toward salmon restoration project development.
Target Species

Project Location

[No information]

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal

NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses:
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses:
Other Planning Document References

CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous

Section 2. Past Accomplishments

n/a or no information

Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information

Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. Develop standardized procedure and format for watershed analysis a. Literature search.
. b. Experimental design and model for proposed framework
. c. Write draft
. d. Review draft
. e. Submit final report and distribute

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 10/01/99 02/01/01 100.0%

Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 1999 Cost
Personnel $ 77,000
Fringe $ 24,255
Supplies $ 3,300
Travel $ 4,200
Indirect $ 40,131
Subcontractor $ 0
Total Itemized Budget $148,886

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 project cost $148,886
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 1999 budget request $148,886
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%

Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable

Reason for change in scope

Not applicable

Cost Sharing

Not applicable

Outyear Budget Totals

All Phases $ 62,036
Total Outyear Budgets $ 62,036

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable

Section 6. References

n/a or no information

Section 7. Abstract


We propose to produce a standardized process and format for watershed analyses specifically designed for evaluation and review of salmon habitat restoration projects. This proposed study is a response to management concerns that watershed analyses be performed and should be made available prior to evaluation of potential habitat restoration projects. However, although many watershed analysis formats and designs do now exist, it is unclear which ones (or parts) are the best to use and what are the best ways to incorporate them into the habitat restoration project review process. This study will consider a variety of key issues that, if not addressed, will result in a process that is inconsistent, confusing, and, in some cases, unnecessarily burdensome, while at the same time, yielding questionable results that have marginal utility for evaluating projects or identifying restoration needs. We will review literature and available tools and guidelines, and consider such issues as: the appropriate scale of analysis; a flexibility of design and linkage of analysis to project type; consideration of intra- and interbasin consistencies in scope and quality; what are the most efficient methods to characterize relevant ecosystem conditions; and how to guide project selection during any interim period while watershed analyses may be in preparation. Study results will determine the most effective format(s) for project deliverables. Possible options could include a written report, a written template, a flow chart scheme, a computer-guided program, and/or a graphical matrix. Time required to complete the proposed project is one year and two months and the proposed cost is $148,886.

Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page