Return to Proposal Finder FY 1999 Proposal 199009200

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Wanaket Wildlife Mitigation Project
BPA Project Proposal Number 199009200
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation
Business acronym (if appropriate) CTUIR
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Carl Scheeler
Mailing Address P.O. Box 638
City, State, Zip Pendleton, OR 97850
Phone 5412785267
Fax 5412764348
E-mail wildlife@ucinet.com
 
Manager of program authorizing this project
 
Review Cycle FY 1999
Province Lower Mid-Columbia
Subbasin Lower Mid-Columbia Mainstem
 
Short Description Protect, enhance, mitigate wildlife habitat impacted by hydroelectric development in McNary Project Area. Achieve NPPC wildlife mitigation objectives in cost efficient manner by protecting/enhancing existing public lands with in-kind habitats on-site
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses:
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses:
Other Planning Document References


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): wildlife


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

n/a or no information


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. Limited use of barbs and large rock to control severe bank erosion a. Flood irrigate property to provide wetland habitats for McNary Target Wildlife Mitigation Species.
1. Limited use of barbs and large rock to control severe bank erosion b. Develop sub-contract and solicit bids for maintenance of intake screens.
1. Limited use of barbs and large rock to control severe bank erosion c. Maintain project fencing to protect upland and wetland habitat values.
1. Limited use of barbs and large rock to control severe bank erosion d. Regulate access management on a permit-only basis to protect wildlife use of habitats during critical life history stages.
2. Survey and control noxious weed infestations. a. Develop and implement sub-contract with for weed control.
3. Collect and propagate native plant materials for future use in vegetation enhancement projects. a. Identify on-site upland shrub and grass species that provide appropriate material sources.
3. Collect and propagate native plant materials for future use in vegetation enhancement projects. b. Develop sub-contracts with unidentified contractor for collection and propogation of materials.

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 12/01/99 12/01/00 90.0%
2 12/01/99 12/01/00 5.0%
3 12/01/99 12/01/00 5.0%


Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 1999 Cost
Personnel $ 46,665
Fringe $ 13,066
Supplies $ 30,100
Travel $ 9,700
Indirect $ 33,840
Subcontractor $ 16,629
Total Itemized Budget $150,000


Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 project cost $150,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 1999 budget request $150,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2000 2001 2002 2003
All Phases $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000
Total Outyear Budgets $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000
 

Other Budget Explanation

Schedule Constraints: None identified.


Section 6. References

n/a or no information


Section 7. Abstract

Abstract

The CTUIR is proposing to continue protecting, enhancing, and mitigating wildlife and wildlife habitat impacted by construction of the McNary Hydroelectric Power Project. Later phases of the project contemplate potential additions of adjacent BLM and private lands to the project. Primary objectives of the project proposal are to protect and mitigate wildlife and wildlife habitat. The project is located within the McNary Project area and provides a unique opportunity to mitigate wildlife habitat losses in-kind and on-site where the original inundation impacts from hydropower development occurred. Key habitat located on the Wanaket Wildlife Area includes upland shrub steppe and riparian habitat. The project includes habitat for eight (8) McNary target wildlife mitigation species including: spotted sandpiper (Actitis macularia); Canada goose (Branta canadensis); yellow warbler (Dendraica petechia); mink (Mustela vison); western meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta); California quail (Lophortyx californicus); mallard (Anas platyrhynchgos); and downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens. Wanaket consists of approximately 2,750 acres and could provide an estimated 2,334 Habitat Units (HU’s) of protection credit and 2,495 Habitat Units of enhancement credit against BPA’s Hydro related debt. Monitoring and evaluation of habitats is based on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Habitat Evaluation Procedures (USFWS, 1980).


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
1999 2000 2001
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000
Comment:

ISRP Review , ISRP 1998-1 Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
The proposal does not adequately describe technical justification, monitoring or methods. The seasonal recharge of the wetlands appears to be a worthwhile goal.

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$150,000
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$225,978
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$225,978
Sponsor (Confederated Tribes Of The Umatilla Indian Reservation) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page