Return to Proposal Finder FY 1999 Proposal 199306600

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Oregon Fish Screening Project FY99 Proposal
BPA Project Proposal Number 199306600
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Business acronym (if appropriate) ODFW
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Roy Elicker
Mailing Address P.O. Box 59
City, State, Zip Portland, OR 97207
Phone 5038725252
Fax 5038725632
E-mail Roy.Elicker@state.or.us
 
Manager of program authorizing this project
 
Review Cycle FY 1999
Province Lower Mid-Columbia
Subbasin John Day
 
Short Description Construct and install approximatley 32 new and replacement fish screening and protection devices, including 2 fishways, in Oregon Water Basins 5,6,&7.
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses: Measures 7.10, 7.10A.2, 7.10A.3.
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses: N/A
Other Planning Document References


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

n/a or no information


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

Project ID Title Description Umbrella
9703500 Eval. of Watershed and Habitat Resp. to Recent Storms:Effects on ESA Salmon Fish protection in project areas. No
9703400 Monitoring Fine Sediment Levels in Substrate & Overwinter Sediment in Clean Fish protection in project areas No
8402100 Mainstem, Middle Fork, North Fork John Day River - Implementation/O&M Cooperate with private landowners for fish enhancement activities. Share office space. No
8400800 North Fork John Day Habitat Improvement Fish protection in project areas No
9303800 North Fork John Day Area Riparian Fencing Fish protection in project areas No
9605300 North Fork John Day River Dredge Tailings Restoration Project Fish Protection in project areas No
9404200 Trout Creek Fish Habitat Restoration Project: Habitat Restoration (fencing, instream structures) in project area No


Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. Prioritize basin projects a. Inventory fish screen structures and/or potential project sites by existing condition, potential juvenile fish mortality, and other factors.
. b. Prioritize projects by location within the watershed, fish species present, potential juvenile fish mortality, and other factors.
. c. Prioritize and schedule individual installations by factors above (1a,1b), water diversion practices, water user cooperation and other factors.
2. Seek water user cooperation and access to project site a. Correlate usage legalities (water rights) with Water Resource Department.
. b. Contact landowner of each proposed project site location for construction access.
. c. Conduct on-site project reviews with irrigation districts and individual owners and users.
3. Project site surveys a. Complete project site surveys in coordination with the Oregon Water Resources Dept., NMFS, and individual property owners.
. b. Provide site survey document to NMFS for implementation approval.
4. Preparation and construction of civil works a. ODFW shop construction crew fabricates specific project forms.
. b. ODFW field construction crew constructs concrete support structures at project site.
5. Component fabrication (ODFW Fish Screening Shop) a. ODFW fish screening shop crew fabricates project fish screening components, including mechanical drum and drive systems as needed.
. b. ODFW field fabrication crew installs drum and drive components into project structure.

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 02/01/99 03/01/99 5.0%
2 03/01/99 07/01/99 10.0%
3 02/01/99 07/01/99 5.0%
4 03/01/99 10/01/99 40.0%
5 02/01/99 11/01/99 40.0%


Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 1999 Cost
Personnel $130,323
Fringe OPE $ 50,826
Supplies Service & Supplies $240,035
Operating -NA- $ 0
Capital -NA- $ 0
Tag -NA- $ 0
Travel Per Diem $ 3,900
Indirect -NA- $ 0
Subcontractor -NA- $ 0
Other $ 97,769
Total Itemized Budget $522,853


Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 project cost $522,853
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 1999 budget request $522,853
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2000 2001 2002 2003
All Phases $540,000 $560,000 $585,000 $605,000
Total Outyear Budgets $540,000 $560,000 $585,000 $605,000
 

Other Budget Explanation

Schedule Constraints: Schedule constraints may occur if: ODFW seasonal employees are not rehired in a timely manner; weather conditions prevent project access; site restraints due to landowner cooperation complications.


Section 6. References

n/a or no information


Section 7. Abstract

Abstract

This project provides immediate and long term protection for anadromous and resident fish species in Oregon Water Basins 5,6&7 by the installation or replacement of fish protection and passage devices on private irrigation diversions. It directly follows the 1994 Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Measure 7.10-Provide Passage and Protective Screens on Tributaries, particularly measures 7.10A.2 and A.3, which mandate: a. Screening and passage criteria based on NMFS standards; b. The use of existing expertise of federal, state, and private entities to accelerate implementation of fish screening and passage measures; and, c. The maintainance of a prioritized list of tributary screening and passage facility improvements – which will include both the construction of new facilities, and the upgrading and maintenance of existing facilites. The expected outcome over the next ten (10) years will include the construction and/or replacement of 450 individual fish screening and passage devices or projects. Select individual fish screening and passage projects will be monitored and evaluated on an annual basis.


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

CBFWA: Watershed Technical Group Comments Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)

Date:
May 13, 1998
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
Technical Issue: Hard to identify what exactly is the base cost - Need to clearly describe the base funding needs for maintenance versus the number and cost for fabrication of new and replacement screens.

CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
1999 2000 2001
$522,853 $540,000 $560,000
Comment:

ISRP Review , ISRP 1998-1 Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
The objectives are not consistently stated throughout the proposal (sections 4 and 7), but it is good that they include the objective to improve survival rates. The monitoring program is not adequately described.

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
capital
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$701,117
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$701,117
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$701,117
Sponsor (ODFW) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page