Return to Proposal Finder FY 1999 Proposal 199401806

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Enhance Habitat For Spring & Fall Chinook, Summer Steelhead and Bulltrout
BPA Project Proposal Number 199401806
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Columbia Conservation District
Business acronym (if appropriate) CCD
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Terry Bruegman
Mailing Address 202 South Second Street
City, State, Zip Dayton, WA 99328-1327
Phone 5093824773
Fax 5093824273
E-mail ccd@bmi.net
 
Manager of program authorizing this project
 
Review Cycle FY 1999
Province Lower Snake
Subbasin Tucannon
 
Short Description Restore, protect, and enhance fish habitat, riparian, and upland areas using bio-engineering technology to reduce stream temperature, sedimentation, geomorphic and stream bank instability while increasing pool density and habitat complexity.
Target Species Spring Chinook, Fall Chinook, summer Steelhead and Bulltrout


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses: 7.0
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses: Endangered Species Act listed species, Snake River Spring Chinook, Snake River Fall Chinook, & Snake River Steelhead. USFWS proposed T&E listing of Bulltrout.
Other Planning Document References


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

n/a or no information


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

Project ID Title Description Umbrella
9202602 Implement Eastern Wa Model Watershed Plans Technical Lead facilitates habitat restoration in the T&E fall and spring chinook and steelhead waters of the Tucannon River Watershed. Facilitates community-wide participation and inter-agency cooperation in habitat restoration activities. No


Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. Reduce Stream Temperatures a. Riparian Enhancement, Tree/Shrub Plantings 8,000 ft
. b. Enhance width/depth ration of stream with installation of habitat structures
. c. In-stream Structures - Refer to Obj. 2 Task a
2. Increase Resting/Rearing Pools with Enhanced Habitat Complexity a. Installation of pool forming/habitat enhancing structures: vortex rock weirs, rock/log barbs, rootwad revetments, rock veins, LWD placement, meander reconstruction
3. Stream Bank and Geomorphic Stability a. In-stream Structures - Refer to Obj. 2 Task a
. b. Riparian Enhancement-Refer to Obj. 1 Task a
4. Reduce Sedimentation in Spawning Gravels a. In-stream Structures - Refer to Obj. 2 Task a
. b. Riparian Enhancement-Refer to Obj. 1 Task a
. c. Upland BMPs (Best Management Practices) Implementation ie. direct seeding/no-till, sediment basins, grass waterways, etc.
5. Monitoring & Evaluation a. Habitat component/utilization as outlined in section 7.e below by WDFW Snake River Laboratory & WSU.
. b. Structural Integrity/function as outlined in section 7.e below by NRCS staff & WSU.

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 10/01/98 12/01/99 27.0%
2 10/01/98 12/01/99 26.0%
3 10/01/98 12/01/99 26.0%
4 10/01/98 12/01/99 18.0%
5 10/01/98 12/01/99 3.0%


Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 1999 Cost
Personnel Project administration is 6% of budget $ 0
Operating $ 69,000
Subcontractor WDFW - Snake River Laboratory; WSU - Center for Environmental Education; Salmon Corps at Nez Perce $ 45,000
Other $1,186,000
Other $1,186,000
Other $1,186,000
Total Itemized Budget $3,672,000


Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 project cost $3,672,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 1999 budget request $3,672,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2000 2001 2002 2003
All Phases $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000
Total Outyear Budgets $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000
 

Other Budget Explanation

Schedule Constraints: Committed long-term funding and cooperation for salmonid habitat restoration and protection is critical for the partnership between landowners and agencies to successfully implement the watershed management plan.


Section 6. References

n/a or no information


Section 7. Abstract

Abstract

Tucannon River Model Watershed Plan was developed to identify, protect, and restore fish habitat by utilizing sound technical information and citizen input. The Plan’s habitat restoration, protection, and enhancement goals are consistent with identified elements in “Strategy For Salmon” and “Wild Salmonid Policy”. Plan implementation, guided by Landowner Steering and Technical Advisory Committees, emphasizes habitat goals - the only element in salmonid restoration that non-governmental entities can impact positively. Project goals of increasing salmonid habitat complexity and stream bank and geomorphic stability, reducing stream temperature and sedimentation in spawning gravels, promoting cooperation and agreement between landowners and resource agencies for restoring resource conditions are referenced in related planning efforts within the Tucannon River Model Watershed Plan. Project implementation is relevant to the 1994 Columbia Fish and Wildlife Program in that specific problems were identified during the planning assessment. Individual, on site, project assessments with an Inter-Disciplinary Team will identify corrective actions to effectively enhance habitat conditions for ESA listed weak populations without adversely effecting biological diversity, while emphasizing total watershed health. Inter-Disciplinary Team consists of landowner, Watershed Technical Lead, and staff from NRCS and WDFW. Resource agency staff representation consistency is emphasized but flexibility is maintained to allow for optimum technical expertise. Monitoring/evaluation of project effectiveness, critical for adaptive management, will be accomplished cooperatively by Watershed Technical Lead, WDFW, NRCS, USFS, and WSU staff. The goals of implementing projects and obtaining data that will identify benefits and deficiencies to guide future enhancement activities is attainable by 2005.


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

CBFWA: Watershed Technical Group Comments Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
Technical Issue: Explain if the big cost increase from FY98 is from the added M&E objective.

Technical Issue: Describe the specific projects at specific locations (especially the Meander project), and describe why these are the most critical projects to conduct.


CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
1999 2000 2001
$253,000 $330,000 $330,000
Comment:
Absorbs part of 9202602

ISRP Review , ISRP 1998-1 Recommendation:
Adequate after revision
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
This proposal is the best among three habitat enhancement proposals for this subbasin. The monitoring program is well described.

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$318,417
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$318,417
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$318,417
Sponsor (Columbia Conservation District) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page