Return to Proposal Finder FY 2000 Proposal 20108

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Recruit, Train, Organize & Support River Stewards
BPA Project Proposal Number 20108
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Oregon Trout
Business acronym (if appropriate)
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Steve Hinton
Mailing Address 117 SW Naito Pkwy
City, State, Zip Portland, OR 97204
Phone 5032229091
Fax 5032229187
E-mail steve.hinton@ortrout.org
 
Manager of program authorizing this project
 
Review Cycle FY 2000
Province Lower Columbia
Subbasin Columbia Lower
 
Short Description Working to recruit, train, organize and support individules practicing river stewardship in sub-basin communities. This grass- root program strives to empower citizens with knowledge and tools to actively protect and enhance their local watershed.
Target Species Multi-Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses: 7.6b.6
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses:
Other Planning Document References The Oregon Plan, Lower Columbia Estuary Long Term Monitoring Strategy, Willamette Basin Restoration Plan, Lower Columbia River Mangement Plan, Mckenzie River Action Plan.


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
1995 Hired full time coordinator for program
1996 Initiated program in Rogue, Umpqua, and North Coast basins.
1997 Expanded program to include Mid Coast, John Day, Klamath, and Willamette Basins
1998 Began organizing in Lower Columbia, Sandy, Deschutes, and Grande Ronde


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

Project ID Title Description Umbrella
9607 Mckenzie River Watershed Coordination Supports education/outreach objectives No
8056 Holistic Master Watershed Stewards Similar Objectives No


Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. Recruit River Stewards; Five for each fifth field HUC in service area. a. Present program materials,objectives and criteria to watershed councils, media, school groups and interest groups.
1. b. Identify active stewards in target area.
1. c. Target key individuals for recruitment.
1. d. Hire basin coordinator and form advisory committee for service areas
1. e. Design recruitment materials to specific watershed issues and objectives.
1. f. Enroll 3 individuals for every stewardship assignment.
2. Train recruits in principles of stewardship a. Provide stewardship curriculum
2. b. Provide workshop trainings for each module.
2. c. Award certificate for course completion.
3. Organize network participants to maximize effectiveness a. Assign journeyman to mentor contact for additional guidence.
3. b. Delegate key responsibilities to appropriate stewards.
3. c. Organize local caucus for disscussion of issues and election of watershed council delegates.
3. d. Cultivate and acknowledge partner organizations.
3. e. Hold annual rendevous
4. Support journeyman and stewards in local activities. a. Provide support for fundraising
4. b. Continue to cultivate new recruits.
4. c. Expand partnerships and delegate roles, responsibilities.
4. d. Provide continuing education opportunities.
4. e. Respond to critical issues

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 01/01/99 06/01/00 Fifteen recruits for each 5th field HUC 10.0%
2 01/01/00 12/01/00 Staffing 40.0%
3 03/01/00 12/01/00 Train Class of 2000 10.0%
4 03/01/00 12/01/00 Local Organization and support 15.0%
4 10/01/00 10/01/00 Awards 2.0%
5 01/01/00 01/01/00 On-going Support 8.0%
6 01/01/00 01/01/00 Administration 15.0%


Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2000 Cost
Personnel $ 40,000
Fringe $ 12,000
Supplies $ 8,000
Travel $ 5,500
Indirect $ 10,250
Total Itemized Budget $ 75,750


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2000 project cost $ 75,750
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2000 budget request $ 75,750
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Organization Item or service provided Amount Cash or In-Kind
Lower Columbia Estuary Program Training Support $ 5,000 unknown
Packard Foundation Personnel Support $ 15,000 unknown
Symantec Corporation General Support $ 10,000 unknown
Alton Jones Foundation General Support $ 10,000 unknown

 

Outyear Budget Totals

2001 2002 2003 2004
All Phases $119,225 $122,800 $126,485 $130,280
Total Outyear Budgets $119,225 $122,800 $126,485 $130,280
 

Other Budget Explanation

Schedule Constraints: Funding


Section 6. References

n/a or no information


Section 7. Abstract

Abstract

Project proposes to recruit, train, organize and support individuals practicing river stewardship in Oregon sub-basin communities. This grass- root program strives to empower citizens with knowledge and tools to actively protect and enhance their local watershed. It is unique in that it tailors learning to fit the individual and strives to maximize community influence. River Stewards within the program enjoy the support and power of full time assistance and support for activities that address limiting factors within their watershed, and recognition within and outside their community for leadership.


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page