Return to Proposal Finder FY 2000 Proposal 198712700

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Smolt Monitoring by Federal and Non-Federal Agencies
BPA Project Proposal Number 198712700
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission
Business acronym (if appropriate) PSMFC
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Pam Kahut/Michele Dehart
Mailing Address 45 SE 82nd Dr., Suite 100
City, State, Zip Gladstone, OR 97027-2522
Phone 5036505400
Fax 5036505426
E-mail Pam_Kahut@psmfc.org
 
Manager of program authorizing this project
 
Review Cycle FY 2000
Province Mainstem/Systemwide
Subbasin Systemwide
 
Short Description Daily passage data through the mainstem, Snake, Columbia and mid-Columbia rivers to facilitate fish passage management decisions, including Biological Opinion implementation, is collected daily. Sampling and marking occur at 8 sites of the larger region.
Target Species yearling chinook, sub-yearling chinook, coho, steelhead, sockeye


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses: NPPC Fish and Wildlife Program 3.6F. 10, Sections 303, 503b, 1403.2.8
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses: NMFS Biological Opinion on Hydrosystem Operations, NMFS BO RPA Section 13a
Other Planning Document References NMFS 1995 Biological Opinion - RPA Section 8 #16; RPA Section 8 #13 (a)


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
1998 Completed all tasks & objectives
1997 Completed all tasks & objectives
1996 Completed all tasks & objectives
1995 Completed all tasks & objectives


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

Project ID Title Description Umbrella
9008000 PITAGIS Critical Component No
9602100 Gas Bubble Disease Research & Monitoring Critical, one task only No
8712703 Imnaha River SMP Yes
8401400 SMP Marking Yes
8332300 Smolt Condition & Arrival Timing Yes
940330 Fish Passage Center Yes
8332300 Monitor Smolts at the Head of Lower Granite Reservoir and Lower Granite Dam Yes
8712702 Comparative Survival Study Yes
20552 SMOLT MONITORING PROGRAM Yes
8712700 Smolt Monitoring (Federal and Non-Federal) Yes


Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. Smolt Monitoring - Lower Granite a. Sample migrants daily in the sample system
1. b. Monitor Gas Bubble Symtoms according to FPC protocols
1. c. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol
1. d. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocols
1. e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation
1. f. Conduct sampling for implementation of the Smolt Transportation Program
2. Smolt Monitoring - McNary a. Sample migrants daily in the sample systems
2. b. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol
2. c. Monitor for Gas Bubble Symtoms according to FPC protocols
2. d. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol
2. e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation
2. f. Conduct sampling for implementation of the Smolt Transportation Program
3. Smolt Monitoring - Grande Ronde a. Sample migrants daily in the Sample System
3. b. Apply PIT Tags
3. c. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol
3. d. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol
3. e. Monitor for gas bubble symptoms according to FPC protocols
3. f. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation
4. Smolt Monitoring - Little Goose a. Sample migrants daily in the sample system
4. b. Monitor Gas Bubble Symtoms according to FPC protocols
4. c. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol
4. d. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol
4. e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation
4. f. Conduct sampling for implementation of the Smolt Transportation Program
5. Hanford Reach Monitoring a. Apply PIT Tags
5. b. Sample migrants daily in the sample system
5. c. Monitor Gas Bubble Symtoms according to FPC protocols
5. d. Transmit data according to FPC protocol
5. e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation
5. f. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol
6. Smolt Monitoring - Lower Monumental a. Sample migrants daily in the sample system
6. b. Monitor Gas Bubble Symtoms according to FPC protocols
6. c. Transmit data according to FPC protocol
6. d. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol
6. e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation
6. f. Conduct sampling for implementation of the Smolt Transportation Program
7. Smolt Monitoring - Rock Island a. Sample Migrants daily in sample system
7. b. Monitor Gas Bubble Symtoms according to FPC protocols
7. c. Apply PIT Tags
7. d. Transmit Data according to FPC protocol
7. e. Conduct data verification procedure according to FPC protocol
7. f. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation
8. Smolt Monitoring John Day Dam a. Sample migrants daily in the sample system
8. b. Monitor for gas bubble symptoms according to the FPC protocols
8. c. Transmit data according to FPC protocol
8. d. Conduct data verification procedures according to FPC protocols
8. e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation
9. Smolt Monitoring at Bonneville Dam a. Sample migrants daily in the Bonneville I sample system
9. b. Monitor for gas bubble symptoms according to the FPC protocol
9. c. Transmit data according to the FPC protocol
9. d. Conduct data verification procedures according to the FPC protocol
9. e. Project management, planning, work statement/budget preparation

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 03/01/00 11/01/00 14.0%
2 03/01/00 12/01/00 13.0%
3 04/01/00 11/01/00 12.0%
4 03/01/00 06/01/00 8.0%
5 03/01/00 07/01/00 2.0%
6 04/01/00 11/01/00 6.0%
7 04/01/00 09/01/00 12.0%
8 03/01/00 11/01/00 15.0%
9 03/01/00 11/01/00 18.0%


Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2000 Cost
Personnel Includes Fringe Benefits $1,255,201
Fringe $ 0
Supplies $ 0
Operating Includes supplies, materials, etc. $161,459
Capital $ 27,604
PIT tags $ 72,500
Travel $ 29,761
Indirect $323,924
Total Itemized Budget $1,870,449


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2000 project cost $1,870,449
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2000 budget request $1,870,449
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Organization Item or service provided Amount Cash or In-Kind
COE Funding Transportation LGR $ 66,690 unknown
(reimbursable) Sampling LGS $ 68,036 unknown
LMN $ 56,135 unknown
MCN $ 73,130 unknown

 

Outyear Budget Totals

2001 2002 2003 2004
All Phases $2,177,130 $2,242,440 $2,309,715 $2,379,006
Total Outyear Budgets $2,177,130 $2,242,440 $2,309,715 $2,379,006
 

Other Budget Explanation

Schedule Constraints: None


Section 6. References

Reference Watershed?
Fish Passage Center Annual Reports 1985 through 1997. No
FPC Web Page No
Fish Passage Center Weekly Reports 1985-1997 No
Bonneville and John Day Monitoring Annual Reports 1985-1997 No
McNary Monitoring Annual Reports 1992-1997 No
Lower Monumental Annual Reports 1992-1997 No
Little Goose Monitoring Annual Report 1992-1997 No
Lower Granite Annual Reports 1992-1997 No
Lower Grande Ronde Annual Reports 1992-1997 No


Section 7. Abstract

Abstract


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

ISRP Preliminary Review , ISRP 99-2 Recommendation:
Fund for one year
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
Recommendation: Fund for one year. Subsequent funding contingent on programmatic review. This entire set of smolt monitoring projects needs to receive a programmatic review with one of the goals to develop and justify a program-wide design that really is capable of delivering enough data, of high enough precision, to answer the management questions.

Comments: The proposal justifies the need for the work to benefit fish. A clear relationship to Biological Opinion implementation is demonstrated. This work is related to other funded work and the linkages are well described. The objectives are clearly stated and related to the project activities. More details relating to the monitoring and evaluation of the results, scheduling of specific tasks and details of sampling design would strengthen the proposal. The smolt monitoring programs in the Umbrella Proposals: 20552, 20542 have been designed to work together to provide temporal and spatial information on juvenile salmon migrations. The projects employ state-of-the-art capture and tagging methods that are periodically reviewed for efficacy. Information from these programs routinely forms the basis for peer reviewed scientific publications that guide policy and research. There is little justification or description of design. It is good that they identify the location of sampling sites. The monitoring needs to be coordinated with analysis and research. Can we really measure the things we are hoping to measure?


CBFWA: Subregional Team Comments Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
Part of SMP.

CBFWA: Fish Passage Advisory Committee Comments Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? Yes -

CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
2000
$1,870,000
Comment:

NWPPC Funding Recommendation , NWPPC 2000-6 Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000
2000
$1,870,449
Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$2,239,743
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$2,239,743
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$2,239,743
Sponsor (Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Sponsor (Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page