Return to Proposal Finder FY 2000 Proposal 198906200

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Fish and Wildlife Program Implementation
BPA Project Proposal Number 198906200
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority
Business acronym (if appropriate) CBFWA
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Brian J. Allee, Ph.D.
Mailing Address 2501 SW First Ave., Suite 200
City, State, Zip Portland, OR 97201
Phone 5032290191
Fax 5032290443
E-mail brian@cbfwf.org
 
Manager of program authorizing this project
 
Review Cycle FY 2000
Province Mainstem/Systemwide
Subbasin Systemwide
 
Short Description Facilitate implementation of the FWP by providing the Draft Annual Implementation Workplan, Research, Monitoring & Evaluation Plan, Program Accomplishments Annual Report, Columbia Basin Status Report, and the Recommended Additions to the Program.
Target Species All fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin.


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses: 3.2B.2, 3.1B.8, 3.3E.1, 3.1B.3, 3.1B.4, 3.1B.9, 3.1B.5, 3.2A.1, 3.2A.2, 3.1D.1, 3.1D.2, 5.1B.2, 7.0B.1
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses: Addresses portions of the US FWS Kootenai River White Sturgeon Biological Opinion and the NMFS Hydrosystem Operations Biological Opinion
Other Planning Document References Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Multi-Year Implementation Plan


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
See reference list in Section 6.


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

Project ID Title Description Umbrella
9403300 Fish Passage Center Supervisory oversight No
9007700 Northern Pikeminnow Management Program Technical administration No
9600800 PATH Plan for Analyzing and Testing Hypotheses Participation Contract administration No
9600500 ISAB Independent Scientific Advisory Board Contract administration No
All projects in the Fish and Wildlife Program Coordination, logisitcal and technical support No


Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. Provide Draft FY 2000 Annual Implementation Work Plan to the Northwest Power Planning Council (Council) and Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). a. Maintain the Multi-Year Plan (MYP) as the basis for the Draft Annual Implementation Work Plan.
1. b. Work with the Council and BPA to develop the form for the solicitation of project proposals for implementation of the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (FWP).
1. c. Work through the Anadromous Fish Caucus, Resident Fish Caucus, and Wildlife Caucus to evaluate the technical merit and management priority of project proposals.
1. d. Work through the full membership to develop a list of projects for inclusion in the Draft Annual Implementation Work Plan.
1. e. Work with the Council and BPA to finalize recommendations.
2. Provide recommendations to the Council and BPA regarding changes and additions to the FY 1999 Annual Implementation Work Plan necessary for its implementation. a. Work with the Council and the BPA to address regional or programmatic issues described in the Annual Implementation Work Plan decision document.
2. b. Update protocols for making decisions on in-season adjustments to the Annual Implementation Work Plan.
2. c. Evaluate referrals by Council and others for changes and additions to the Annual Implementation Work Plan.
3. Provide assessments to Council and BPA on how conclusions resulting from regional reviews affect fish and wildlife manage- ment decision. a. Conduct, or participate in, and contribute to the review.
3. b. Define and evaluate implications for fish and wildlife management based on review conclusions.
4. Provide draft Regional Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation Plan (RMEP) for the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program to the Council and BPA. a. Identify and assign priorities to information needs based on goals, objectives and strategies in the MYP (research).
4. b. Identify key performance measures of success based on goals, objectives and strategies in the MYP (monitoring and evaluation).
4. c. Identify ongoing projects that address research, monitoring and evaluation needs.
4. d. Identify outstanding information needs necessary to implement the research, monitoring and evaluation plan that are not currently addressed by ongoing projects.
4. e. Submit draft Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation Plan (RMEP) to peer, regional, and public review process.
5. Provide to the Council and BPA estimates of dollars needed for fish and wildlife protection, mitigation and enhancement and recommendations on how those dollars are best allocated toward that end. a. Refine estimates of out-year costs for fish and wildlife protection, mitigation, and enhancement.
5. b. Review and comment on analyses by BPA and others being proposed as a basis for their financial obligations for fish and wildlife protection, mitigation, and enhancement.
5. c. Highlight outstanding needs for the federal government to meet their fish and wildlife obligations (e.g. conditions in MOA annex).
6. Provide a report on how fish and wildlife populations have responded to implementation of the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program and an assessment of how the Program could be modified to meet the goals and objectives set forth in the MYP. a. Conduct periodic evaluations of projects and programs to assess progress toward stated goals and objectives and reaffirm consistency with Multi-Year Plan, in the Program Accomplishments Annual Report (PAAR).
6. b. Develop a Status Report on fish and wildlife in the Columbia Basin.
6. c. Develop an assessment of how the fish and wildlife program could be modified to meet the goals and objectives in the Recommended Additions to the program (RAP).

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 11/01/99 10/01/00 Annual activity, next review in 2004 69.0%
2 11/01/99 10/01/00 Annual activity, next review in 2004 4.0%
3 11/01/99 10/01/00 Annual activity, next review in 2004 9.0%
4 11/01/99 08/01/00 Report completed 8/2000, review 2001 7.0%
5 11/01/99 10/01/00 Annual activity, next review in 2004 3.0%
6 11/01/99 10/01/04 Task 6a: Review 1st report 2001, next process-based review in 2004. Task 6b: Review after report completed in 2003. Task 6c: Review after report completed 2001 8.0%


Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2000 Cost
Personnel See Key Personnel and Section 8 (h). $1,258,024
Fringe Medical, dental, vision, retirement, group life, disability, vacation/ sick leave $215,624
Supplies Office supplies, telephone, printing copies, messengers, postage $ 60,500
Operating Equipment and Maintenance $ 10,000
Travel Cost for all members and staff to participate in accomplishing objectives $245,000
Indirect $391,383
Total Itemized Budget $2,180,531


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2000 project cost $2,180,531
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2000 budget request $2,180,531
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Organization Item or service provided Amount Cash or In-Kind
BPA Management Staff $110,000 unknown

 

Outyear Budget Totals

2001 2002 2003 2004
All Phases $2,245,948 $2,313,326 $2,382,726 $2,454,208
Total Outyear Budgets $2,245,948 $2,313,326 $2,382,726 $2,454,208
 

Other Budget Explanation

Schedule Constraints: CBFWA will meet the 4/15 publication date for Objective 1 if the proposals are received prior to 1/1. Objectives 2, 3 and 5 are directly tied to schedules outside CBFWA's control. Objectives 4 and 6 are new intitiatives and should be published on time.


Section 6. References

Reference Watershed?
Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 1987. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority Charter. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority.13 pp. No
______. 1988. Smolt Monitoring Program 1987 Annual Report. Fish Passage Center. 112 pp. No
______. 1989. Review of the History, Development and Management of Anadromous Fish Production Facilities in the Columbia River Basin. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 52 pp No
______. 1990-98. CBFWA Directory. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1990. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority Wildlife Project Proposal Ranking Methodology. pg. var. No
______. 1990. Proposed Mainstem Flows for Columbia Basin Anadromous Fish. Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 12 pp. No
______. 1990. Proposed Mainstem Flows for Columbia Basin Anadromous and Resident Fish: Technical Addendum – Resident Fish Requirements. Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 58 pp. No
______. 1991-94. Detailed Fishery Operations Plan. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1991. The Biological and Technical Justification for the Flow Proposal of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 72 pp. No
______. 1991. Integrated System Plan for Salmon and Steelhead Production in the Columbia River Basin. Document 91-16. The Northwest Power Planning Council. 527 pp. No
______. 1991. Proposed Main Stem Flows for Columbia Basin Anadromous and Resident Fish: Technical Addendum. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1991. Recommendations for Early Implementation of Projects in Accordance with the Columbia River Basin Salmon and Steelhead Integrated System Plan. Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. 115 pp. No
______. 1992. Proposed Annual Implementation Work Plan for Fiscal Year 1993. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 100 pp. No
______. 1992. Proposed Annual Implementation Work Plan for Fiscal Year 1994. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 90 pp. No
______. 1992-93. Hatchery Operations Manuals. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1993 Detailed Fishery Operating Plan with 1994 Operating Criteria. Fish Passage Center. pg. var. No
______. 1993-94. Integrated Hatchery Operations Team Polices. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1993-current. Pikeminnow Quarterly and Annual Reports. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1994. An Independent Review of the Pacific Salmon Treaty of 1985 and the Pacific Salmon Treaty Act of 1985. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 21 pp. No
______. 1994. CBFWA Member Comments on Draft Anadromous Fish Amendments to Columbia River Basin. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1994. Comments on Amendments to the Strategy for Salmon. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 235 pp. No
______. 1994. FY 1995 Annual Fish & Wildlife Plan. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 245 pp. No
______. 1994. Member Comments on Compilation of CBFWA on Snake River Recovery Plan Recommendation. pg. var. No
______. 1995. Columbia River Basin Fish & Wildlife Program Work Plan for Fiscal Year 1996. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority & Northwest Power Planning Council. 52 pp. No
______. 1995. DPEIS on Impacts of Artificial Salmon & Steelhead Production Strategies in the Columbia River Basin. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. pg. var. No
______. 1995-97. Fish Screen Oversight Committee Annual Reports. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1996. Draft DPEIS - A Migration Corridor Assessment of the Cumulative Impacts of a Range of Artificial Salmon and Steelhead Production Strategies Designed to Balance Fish Allocations Among Existing Mandates in the Col. River Basin.CBFWA.pg. var. No
______. 1996. Draft Multi-Year Implementation Plan For the Protection, Restoration, and Enhancement of Columbia River Basin Fish & Wildlife Resources. Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1996. Draft Results of the Fish & Wildlife Managers’ Review and Assessment of FY 1997 Projects. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1996. Impacts of Artificial Salmon & Steelhead Production Strategies in Columbia River Basin. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. pg. var. No
______. 1997. Addenda Draft FY 1998 Annual Implementation Work Plan. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 13 pp. No
______. 1997. Draft FY 1998 Annual Implementation Work Plan. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 119 pp. No
______. 1997. FY 1998 Annual Implementation Work Plan. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 228 pp. No
______. 1997. Integrated Watershed Projects: The Process & Criteria for Selecting Watershed Projects for the Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Program. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 17 pp. No
______. 1997. Review of Projects Abstracts. Bonneville Power Administration. 295 pp. No
______. 1998. CBFWA Response to NPPC Document 98-25 FY 1999 Annual Implementation Work Plan Funding Recommendations Version 2. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 30 pp. No
______. 1998. Draft FY 1999 Annual Implementation Work Plan Vols. I-IV. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 170 pp., 320 pp., 157 pp. No
_______. 1998. Fish Passage Managers Annual Reports. Fish Passage Center. pg. var. No
______. 1998. Future Fish and Wildlife Costs. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 60 pp. plus Appendices. No
______. 1998. FY 1998 Watershed Project Technical Evaluation. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 43 pp. No
______. 1998. FY 1998 Watershed Project Technical Evaluation Review 2. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 33 pp. No
______. 1998. FY 1999 Draft Annual Implementation Work Plan-Draft Decision Document (Phase I). Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 57 pp. No
______. 1998. FY 1999 Watershed Project Technical Evaluation. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 38 pp. No
______. 1998. Guidelines for Enhancement, Operation, and Maintenance Activities for Wildlife Mitigation Projects. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 44 pp. No
______. 1998. How to Improve Your FY 2000 Proposal. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. pg. var. No
______. 1998. Multi-Year Anadromous Fish Plan Draft. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 115 pp. No
______. 1998. Multi-Year Funding: A Process and Qualifications for Project Sleection Under the Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Program. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 6 pp. No
______. 1998. Ten Year Fish & Wildlife Budget. Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. 15 pp. No
Northwest Power Planning Council. 1984. 1984 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Northwest Power Planning Council. Section 102. 138 pp. No
______. 1987. 1987 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Northwest Power Planning Council. 246 pp. No
______. 1992. Strategy for Salmon Volume II. Document No. 92-21A. Northwest Power Planning Council. 98 pp. No
______. 1994. Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Document 94-55. Northwest Power Planning Council. pag. var. No
______. 1995. Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Resident Fish and Wildlife Amendments. Document No. 95-20. Northwest Power Planning Council. pag. var. No
Public Law 96-501 96th Congress. 1980. Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act. Bonneville Power Administration U.S. Department of Energy. pag. var. No


Section 7. Abstract

Abstract


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page