Return to Proposal Finder FY 2000 Proposal 198909803

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Objectives, tasks and schedules
Section 5. Budget
Section 6. References
Section 7. Abstract

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Evaluate Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers
BPA Project Proposal Number 198909803
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
Business acronym (if appropriate) SBT
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Christopher A. Reighn
Mailing Address P.O. Box 306
City, State, Zip Fort Hall, ID 83203
Phone 2082383762
Fax 2082383742
E-mail issfish@srv.net
 
Manager of program authorizing this project
 
Review Cycle FY 2000
Province Mountain Snake
Subbasin Salmon
 
Short Description Evaluate various supplementation strategies for maintaining and rebuilding spring/summer chinook populations in Idaho. Develop recommendations for the use of supplementation to rebuild naturally spawning populations.
Target Species Spring / summer chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


NPPC Program Measure Number(s) which this project addresses: 7.3B.2, 7.0A, 7.1B.1, 7.1C.3, 7.2A
FWS/NMFS Biological Opinion Number(s) which this project addresses: ESA Section 10 Permit 1127
Other Planning Document References Snake River Recovery Plan 4.5.c., 4.1, 4.1B, 4.2; Wy Kan Ush Me Wa Kush Wit 5B pages 14-23


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
1991 Identified study areas, brood stocks, facilities to be used.
1992 Begin supplementation and monitoring of treatment streams and monitoring of control streams.
1996 Annual Report (1992-1995) Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
1996 Small scale investigation into chinook salmon supplementation strategies and techniques: 1992 -1994. Technical Reports. Peery, C.A. and T.C. Bjornn.
1997 First generation returns, a known brood stock for supplementation is established.
1998 Five-year Report (1992-1997) in progress.


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

Project ID Title Description Umbrella
8909800 Idaho Dept. of Fish and Game Cooperator on ISS Study No
8909801 US Fish & Wildlife Service Cooperator on ISS Study No
8909802 Nez Perce Tribe Cooperator on ISS Study No
9005500 Steelhead Supplementation Studies Reciprocal transfer of data / coordination No
8335000 Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery - O&M and M&E Reciprocal transfer of data / coordination of treatments No
9405000 Salmon River Habitat Enhancement O&M/Monitoring and Evaluation Reciprocal transfer of data / coordination No
9705700 Salmon River Production Program Reciprocal transfer of data / coordination No
9703000 Listed Stock Adult Escapement Reciprocal transfer of data / coordination No
9102800 Monitoring Smolt Migration of Wild Snake River Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon Reciprocal transfer of data / coordination No
9604300 Johnson Creek Artificial Propagation Enhancement - O&M and M&E Reciprocal transfer of data / coordination of treatments No
20545 Salmon Supplementation in Idaho Rivers (ISS) Yes
8909803 Shoshone-Bannock Tribea - ISS cooperator Yes
8909802 Nez Perce Tribe - ISS cooperator Yes
8909801 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - ISS cooperator Yes
8909800 Idaho Dept. of Fish and Game - ISS cooperator Yes


Section 4. Objectives, Tasks and Schedules

Objectives and Tasks

Objective Task
1. Monitor and evaluate the effects of supplementation on parr, presmolt and smolt numbers and spawning escapements of naturally produced salmon. a. Continue to implement "standardized" spawning, rearing, and marking and release protocols.
1. b. Differentially mark all hatchery supplementation and general production fish released in or nearby study streams.
1. c. PIT tag a minimum of 700 hatchery supplementation and general production fish released in or nearby study streams.
1. d. Release various life stages of chinook salmon. Determine fish numbers for each life stage based on existing natural production and natural rearing capacity.
1. e. Estimate late summer parr densities from snorkeling surveys.
1. f. Pit tag a minimum of 700 naturally produced parr from each treatment and control stream to estimate smolt production and survival.
1. g. Use existing weirs to collect, mark (PIT tag), and enumerate emigrating fish and to identify and enumerate returning adults.
1. h. Compare natural production of supplemented populations to unsupplemented populations and baseline data.
2. Monitor and evaluate changes in natural productivity and genetic composition of target and adjacent populations following supplementation a. Monitor productivity and genetic indices from supplemented populations and compare baseline and controls.
2. b. Monitor straying of hatchery supplementation fish into adjacent and control streams by weirs and carcass surveys.
2. c. Determine spawner to recruitment relationship based on determined production and productivity indices (parr and smolt numbers, adult escapements, survival, eggs/spawner etc.).
2. d. Predict population viability based on spawner to recruitment relationship to determine of the population will maintain itself through time in the absence of additional supplementation.
3. Determine which supplementation strategies (broodstock and release stage) provide the quickest and highest response in natural production without adverse effects on productivity. (Long Term) a. Monitor and evaluate natural production (presmolt, smolt and adult numbers) and productivity (survival, life stage characteristics, pathogens, straying, genetic composition) of supplemented populations and compare to baseline and controls.
3. b. Use local broodstocks with known natural component from the target population during the second generation of supplementation.
3. c. Compare natural production and productivity indices of supplemented populations using existing hatchery broodstocks (first generation) to populations using locally developed broodstocks (second generation).
3. d. Compare natural production and productivity indices among supplemented populations using parr, fall presmolt and smolt release strategies.
4. Determine which supplementation strategies (brood stock and release stage) provide the quickest and highest response in natural production without adverse effects on productivity. (Long term) a. Guidelines and recommendations will be developed addressing risks and benefits of supplementation (augmentation and restoration) in general and specific supplementation strategies (broodstock and release stage).
4. b. Use local brood stocks with known natural component from the target population during the second generation of supplementation.

Objective Schedules and Costs

Objective Start Date End Date Measurable Biological Objectives Milestone FY 2000 Cost %
1 05/01/92 12/01/07 Evaluation of supplementation effects on numbers of presmolt and smolt, and spawning escapements of naturally produced salmon. X 32.0%
2 05/01/92 12/01/07 Evaluate increases or decreases in number of naturally produced salmon. Evaluate genetic composition of target and adjacent populations following supplementation. X 32.0%
3 05/01/92 12/01/07 Determine which brood stock and release stage result in the quickest and highest (if any) increase in natural production, without adversely effecting the productivity. X 32.0%
4 01/01/99 09/01/07 Supplementation recommendations completed in final study report. X 4.0%


Section 5. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2000 Cost
Personnel $ 97,500
Fringe 34% of personnel costs $ 33,150
Supplies Includes both office supplies, field supplies, maintenance and repair $ 7,000
Capital No major equipment purchases over $1,000 are anticipated at this time. $ 0
PIT tags 6000 $ 17,400
Travel Vehicles, lodging, per diem, airfare, meetings $ 34,000
Indirect Estimate 29% of personnel and fringe benefits $ 37,888
Other Training, Education, Workshops $ 1,500
Total Itemized Budget $228,438


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2000 project cost $228,438
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2000 budget request $228,438
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 $ 0
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Not applicable


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Organization Item or service provided Amount Cash or In-Kind
None $ 0 unknown

 

Outyear Budget Totals

2001 2002 2003 2004
All Phases $230,000 $235,000 $240,000 $245,000
Total Outyear Budgets $230,000 $235,000 $240,000 $245,000
 

Other Budget Explanation

Schedule Constraints: The continued decline of spring/summer chinook salmon returning to Idaho resulting in insufficient adult returns to provide target supplementation treatments.


Section 6. References

Reference Watershed?
Northwest Power Planning Council (NPPC). 1987. Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Portland, Oregon. No
Northwest Power Planning Council (NPPC). 1994. Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Portland, Oregon. No
Regional Assessment of Supplementation Project (RASP). 1991. Draft status report for review and comment. Prepared for Bonneville Power Administration PJSP, Portland, Oregon. No
Scheaffer, R.L., W. Mendenhall, and L. Ott. 1979. Elementary survey sampling, 2nd edition. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Massachusetts. No
Smith, S.G., J.R. Skalski, J.W. Schlechte, A. Hoffman, and V. Cassen. 1994. SURPH.1 Manual. Statistical survival analysis for fish and wildlife tagging studies. Developed for the Bonneville Power Administration. University of Washington, Center for Quant No
itative Science. No
ISS Project reports No
Bowles, E. and E. Leitzinger, 1991. Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers. Experimental Design to the U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration. Project No. 89-098. Contact No. DE-BI79-89BP01466. No
Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers- Five year summary report. (In progress 1999). No
Peery, C.A. and T.C. Bjornn. 1996. Small-scale investigations into chinook salmon supplementation strategies and techniques: 1992-1994. Technical Report 96-3 ICFWRU, University of Idaho. IDFG and BPA, Portland, Oregon. No
Idaho Department of Fish and Game reports No
Lietzinger, E.J., K. Plaster, P. Hassemer, and P. Sankovich. 1996. Idaho supplementation studies annual progress report 1993. Idaho Department of Fish and Game annual report to U.S. Department of Energy-Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon No
Lietzinger, E. J., K. Plaster, and E. Bowles. 1993. Idaho supplementation studies annual report 1991-1992. Fisheries Research Section, Idaho Department of Fish and Game annual report to U.S. Department of Energy - Bonneville Power Administration. No
Nemeth, D., K. Plaster, K. Apperson, J. Brostrom, T. Curet, and E. Brown. 1996. Idaho supplementation studies annual report 1994. Idaho Department of Fish and Game annual report to U.S. Department of Energy-Bonneville Power Administration, Portland No
Nez Perce Tribe reports No
Arnsberg, B.D. 1993. Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers. Annual work summary for 1992. U.S. Department of Energy - Bonneville Power Administration. Portland, Oregon. No
Hesse, J.A. and B.D. Arnsberg 1994. Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers. Annual Report - 1993. U.S. Department of Energy - Bonneville Power Administration. Portland, Oregon. No
Hesse, J.A., P.J. Cleary, and B.D. Arnsberg. 1995. Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers. Annual Report - 1994. U.S. Department of Energy - Bonneville Power Administration. Portland, Oregon. No
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes reports No
Keith, R.M., M. Rowe, C.A.Reighn, J. Honena, and T. Trahant. 1996. Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers - Annual Report 1995. US Department of Energy - Bonneville Power Administration. Portland, Oregon. No
US Fish and Wildlife Service reports No
Rockhold, E.A., R.B. Roseberg, and J.M. Olson 1997. Idaho Supplementation Studies - Pete King and Clear Creeks progress report 1991-1993. US Department of Energy - Bonneville Power Administration. Portland, Oregon. No


Section 7. Abstract

Abstract


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

ISRP Preliminary Review , ISRP 99-2 Recommendation:
Fund for one year
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
Recommendation: Fund for one year. Subsequent funding contingent on a programmatic review of the supplementation effort in the Snake River Basin similar to the Lower Snake Compensation Plan symposium of February 1998.

Comments: This is the Shoshone-Bannock Tribe's portion of the Idaho supplementation study in the South Fork Salmon River, Bear Valley Creek, Valley Creek, West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon River, East Fork Salmon River, and Herd Creek. All test sites are in the Salmon River drainage. The role of each stream is not described and readers are referred to the umbrella proposal (which explains the methods at only a general level). ). No progress is described to so no project assessment is possible, although the project (or its parent project) approaches ten years duration. This is the same proposal as the other supplementation proposals except for budget, facilities, and named areas. The reviewers asked: Is there nothing unique about the different study sites that is worthy of mention? Why does the experimental design and statistical approach need to be repeated in each proposal?


CBFWA: Nonwatershed Technical Group Comments Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? Yes -

CBFWA: Subregional Team Comments Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
[There are no budget numbers associated with this review.]
Comment:
These projects provide a critical component for monitoring Spring and Summer chinook in Idaho, including supplemented and wild populations. These are ongoing critical projects and we recommend funding at the requested levels in order achieve management objectives in this region. See umbrella proposal #20545.

CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
2000
$228,000
Comment:

NWPPC Funding Recommendation , NWPPC 2000-6 Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000
2000
$228,438
Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$240,767
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$240,767
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$240,767
Sponsor (Shoshone Bannock Tribe) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page